Prostaglandins Versus Trans-cervical Balloon for Induction of Labor in Fetal Growth Restriction (PROBIN)
NCT ID: NCT05674487
Last Updated: 2025-04-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
774 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-09
2026-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
• Is trans-cervical balloon superior to prostaglandins in reducing the cesarean section rate, without increasing neonatal morbidity? Participants will have an induction of labour by cervical ripening with trans-cervical balloon in the trans-cervical balloon catheter arm and with Prostaglandins in the Misoprostol arm.
Researchers will compare two methods of induction: trans-cervical balloon and prostaglandins to see if trans-cervical balloon is associated with a lower risk of cesarean delivery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Balloon + Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol to Induce Labor in Case of PROM (RUBAPRO2)
NCT05568745
The Balloon Project for Birth Induction
NCT01255839
Artificial Induction of Labour in Full-term Singleton Pregnancy : Comparative Randomized Trial of Two Strategies
NCT04452747
Outpatient Transcervical Balloon For Induction of Labor
NCT05798728
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon
NCT01139801
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Growth-restricted fetuses are a population at increased risk for non-reassuring fetal status and hypoxia during labor because of their lower weight. Prostaglandins can lead to cardiotocograph (CTG) tracing abnormalities by causing uterine tachysystole in normal-weight fetuses. Nevertheless, the question of the method of induction of labor has been poorly studied in the population of growth-restricted fetuses. None of the national and international societies reports in their guidelines which method of induction of labor should be offered to pregnancies complicated by a fetal growth restriction. A few retrospective studies are in favor of an increased risk of uterine tachysystole with consequences on the CTG tracing in the case of cervical ripening with prostaglandins compared to the trans-cervical balloon. However, the results of these studies lack robustness due to important methodological limitations.
Because trans-cervical balloon is a mechanical method of cervical ripening, it may be less likely to cause uterine tachysystole and thus fewer non-reassuring fetal status. Thus, the risk of cesarean section in labor could be decreased compared with the use of prostaglandins in the growth-restricted fetal population.
To date, there is no published quality randomized controlled trials on the optimal method of cervical ripening in induction of labor for FGR fetuses.
The present large-scale randomized trial aim to define the preferred method of induction for these fetuses, associated with a lower risk of cesarean delivery. If it is demonstrated that one method of induction (trans-cervical balloon) is superior to another (prostaglandins) in reducing the cesarean section rate, without increasing neonatal morbidity, the results of our study are likely to lead to changes in national and international recommendations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Trans-cervical balloon
Induction of labor by cervical ripening with trans-cervical balloon (Foley catheter).
Trans-cervical balloon
Induction of labor by cervical ripening with trans-cervical balloon (Foley catheter).
Misoprostol
Induction of labor by cervical ripening with Prostaglandins (Misoprostol per os)
Misoprostol
Induction of labor by cervical ripening with Prostaglandins (Misoprostol per os)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Trans-cervical balloon
Induction of labor by cervical ripening with trans-cervical balloon (Foley catheter).
Misoprostol
Induction of labor by cervical ripening with Prostaglandins (Misoprostol per os)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Singleton gestation, with cephalic presentation
* Gestational age at randomization between entre 34 weeks of gestation and 0 day and 41 weeks of gestation and 0 day
* Fetal growth restriction (FGR). FGR is defined at the third trimester by an abdominal circumference below the 10th centile and/or an estimated fetal weight below the 10th centile (according to local curve), according to the trial DIGITAT. Fetus with normal and abnormal Doppler index can be included.
* Plan for induction of labor whatever the indication (fetal growth restriction or other), the induction of labor is the induction of birth by vaginal delivery
* Bishop Score below 6
* Affiliated or beneficiary to a health security system
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* History of previous cesarean delivery, myomectomy by laparotomy or laparoscopy
* Contraindication to misoprostol or trans-cervical balloon
* Known HIV positivity (because of modified delivery plan)
* Known major fetal anomaly or chromosomic anomaly
* Fetal demise
* Patient under legal protection
* Poor understanding of the French language
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Bordeaux
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Bordeaux
Bordeaux, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUBX 2022/42
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
NCT05848869
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: nct_alias
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.