Continuous Thoracic Epidural Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Donar Hepatectomies.
NCT ID: NCT04151511
Last Updated: 2019-11-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-19
2020-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
so this study is comparison of two technique (Thoracic epidural analgesia vs Erector spinae plane block) to relieve pain.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block in Post Operative Pain Management in Hepatectomy
NCT06822309
Comparation of Bilateral and Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT05152602
Ultrasound Guided External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Block for Post Hepatectomy Pain
NCT07337330
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Liver Transplantation Donors
NCT05406388
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Open Liver Resection Surgery
NCT05253079
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia technique described in 2016 6 for the management of thoracic and abdominal pain. Ultrasound guidance is used to inject a local anesthetic in the interfacial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the associated transverse process of the spine. The mechanism of action is by the spread of local anesthetic anteriorly to the dorsal and ventral rami of the thoracic and abdominal spinal nerves 7. The absence of blood vessels in this vicinity shows the usefulness of this technique in the patients, who are prone to coagulopathies making it safer with lesser expertise, and with less procedural complications 8. The ESPB is an avascular plane block therefore, it results in lower plasma volumes rise due to reduced uptake of the local anesthetic by plasma hence the duration of action of local anesthetic is long. An ESPB at T5 level is sufficient to have a unilateral multi-dermatomes sensory block ranging from T1 to L3 level10 when used as a continuous block. Various case reports demonstrate its efficacy in a wide spectrum of specialities like acute and chronic pain management, thoraco-abdominal surgeries, neuropathic and post-traumatic pain 4, 7, 8,9 , 10. A comparison of continuous epidural versus single shot intrathecal morphine was made and assessed the quality of analgesia by a visual analog scale (VAS) and the additional IV analgesic requirements were 56% in cases of epidural 11 used for sample size calculation.
However, no randomized control study has been performed to compare the efficacy of a continuous ESPB with that of a continuous TEA for living related donor hepatectomies. Thus the aim of this study is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of continuous ESPB to that of a continuous TEA in patients undergoing adult living donor hepatectomies. Investigators have hypothesized that continuous ESPB would provide better postoperative analgesia with fewer adverse effects. The primary outcome is post-operative pain scores using the visual analog scale (V.A.S) for pain at rest and at maximal inspiration during the post-operative period at PACU, 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours. The secondary outcomes include lung incentive spirometry volumes, the dosage of adjunct nalbuphine used, hypotension, tachycardia, post-operative coagulopathy, early mobilization and discharge from surgical I.C.U (S.I.C.U).
Methodology After approval from the institutional and ethical review board and written informed consent, patients were randomized into either the TEA group or the ESPB group using the sealed enveloped method.
Study design The study will be a single-blinded, prospective, comparative, randomized control trial. The participants will be assigned to one of two groups; Group A will include patients receiving continuous TEA, whilst Group B will include patients receiving continuous ESPB. Both groups will receive their respective intervention after induction with standard general anesthesia.
Blinding is done at the level of assessor. The primary assessor will be blind with the type of technique applied and fill the Proforma according to standard routine with the same drug infusion.
Study population The study will include all adult patients undergoing elective living related donor hepatectomies for liver transplant surgery.
Study setting Study will be conducted in the liver transplant operating rooms of Shifa International Hospital.
Study duration The study duration will be of up to 12 months from the date of approval of the study from the hospital's institutional and ethical review board.
Randomization Randomization will be done by the simple random sampling technique using the sealed envelope method.
Sample Size Sample size was calculated by the WHO sample size calculator and using the following parameters; Level of significance - 5% Power of the test - 80% Proportion of patients requiring opioid in epidural group - 0.56 (ref no.13) Anticipated proportion of patients requiring opioid in ESP group - 0.25 Sample size - 30 patients in each group
Induction of General Anaesthesia In the operating room, the patient will be positioned on the operating table; the standard monitors: non-invasive blood pressure, ECG, pulse oximetry will be applied. A 20 gauge intravenous cannula will be secured on the dorsum of the hand and connected to a maintenance intravenous fluid therapy. The patient will be pre-oxygenated for 3 minutes with oxygen. The patient will be administered injection Ondansetron (0.1mg/kg) and injection Midazolam (0.02mg/kg) intravenous to start with. The patient will be induced with injection Buprenorphine (0.02mg/kg) and injection Propofol (2 mg/kg) mixed with Lidocaine (60 mg), and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg), after which an endotracheal tube will be inserted and mechanical ventilation will be initiated. A radial arterial line and a central venous line will be inserted. Both TEA and ESPB catheters will be placed after induction of general anesthesia for surgery by experienced practitioners in the left lateral decubitus position.
Data Collection Data for the study will be collected by a standardized performa which will record all the required variables of the study. Confidentiality of patient's data will be maintained.
Data Analysis The data will be analyzed by using the IBM SPSS software, version 25.0, for Windows.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Continuous Thoracic Epidural
Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Adult Living Donar Open Hepatectomies
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block
1. Continuous Thoracic Epidural Thoracic Epidural Analgesia
2. Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Adult Living Donar Open Hepatectomies
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block
1. Continuous Thoracic Epidural Thoracic Epidural Analgesia
2. Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block
1. Continuous Thoracic Epidural Thoracic Epidural Analgesia
2. Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergy, hypersensitivity or any other contraindications to local anesthetic
* Anatomical variation for block landmarks
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shifa International Hospital
OTHER
Shifa Clinical Research Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Muhammad Zubair
Associate Consultant Anaesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr Muhammad Zubair
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Shifa International Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital
Islamabad, , Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kostov S, Schug SA. Depression and chronic pain. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):377-378. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_69_18. No abstract available.
Dewe G, Steyaert A, De Kock M, Lois F, Reding R, Forget P. Pain management in living related adult donor hepatectomy: feasibility of an evidence-based protocol in 100 consecutive donors. BMC Res Notes. 2018 Nov 26;11(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3941-1.
Tzimas P, Prout J, Papadopoulos G, Mallett SV. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia for liver resection. Anaesthesia. 2013 Jun;68(6):628-35. doi: 10.1111/anae.12191.
Chhibber A, Dziak J, Kolano J, Norton JR, Lustik S. Anesthesia care for adult live donor hepatectomy: our experiences with 100 cases. Liver Transpl. 2007 Apr;13(4):537-42. doi: 10.1002/lt.21074.
El-Boghdadly K, Pawa A. The erector spinae plane block: plane and simple. Anaesthesia. 2017 Apr;72(4):434-438. doi: 10.1111/anae.13830. Epub 2017 Feb 11. No abstract available.
Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
Jain K, Jaiswal V, Puri A. Erector spinae plane block: Relatively new block on horizon with a wide spectrum of application - A case series. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;62(10):809-813. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_263_18.
Adhikary SD, Pruett A, Forero M, Thiruvenkatarajan V. Erector spinae plane block as an alternative to epidural analgesia for post-operative analgesia following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A case study and a literature review on the spread of local anaesthetic in the erector spinae plane. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;62(1):75-78. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_693_17.
Tulgar S, Selvi O, Kapakli MS. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Different Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: Case Series. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb 18;2018:3947281. doi: 10.1155/2018/3947281. eCollection 2018.
De Pietri L, Siniscalchi A, Reggiani A, Masetti M, Begliomini B, Gazzi M, Gerunda GE, Pasetto A. The use of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after liver resection: a comparison with epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Apr;102(4):1157-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000198567.85040.ce.
Zubair M, Adil Khan M, Khan MNA, Iqbal S, Ashraf M, Saleem SA. Comparison of Continuous Thoracic Epidural With Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Living Donor Hepatectomy. Cureus. 2022 Mar 14;14(3):e23151. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23151. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB Ref #165-665-2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.