Mathematical Arterialisation of Capillary Blood for Blood Gas Analysis in Critical Ill Patients

NCT ID: NCT04144296

Last Updated: 2021-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-01

Study Completion Date

2021-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare capillary blood gas analysis compensated by v-TAC software (aCBGE, aCBGF) to arterial blood gas analysis (ABG) in terms of pH, pCO2 and pO2 and the clinical usefulness of this method compared to the gold standard of ABG.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In clinical practice blood gas analysis is an essential tool for monitoring respiratory status. The gold-standard method is arterial blood gas analysis (ABG) of blood from the patient's radial or femoral artery. An alternative to arterial sampling commonly used is arterialized capillary blood gas analysis from the earlobe (CBGE). Though CBGE is less invasive and can be performed by non-medical staff, it is less useful in the acute setting because an adequate vasodilatation is needed which typically lasts for at least 10 minutes and the quality of results tends to be operator dependable. Different trials have evaluated the agreement between ABG and CBGE. Whereas a close agreement between ABG and CBGE has been found for evaluating pH and the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2), several trials showed considerable variations for the partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) and that CBGE tends to underestimate PO2. Similar findings apply for capillary blood gas analysis from the fingertip (CBGF) which is even less accurate compared to CBGE in estimating PO2. Recently a method has been developed to calculate ABG values mathematically from peripheral venous blood, supplemented with oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurement by pulse oximetry, by use of venous-to-arterial conversion (v-TAC) software (OBI Medical, Denmark). The principle of the method is a mathematical transformation of venous blood gas analysis (VBG) values to arterialised values (aVBG) by simulating the transport of blood back through the tissue (6). This approach leads to a clinically acceptable agreement between ABG and aVBG for pH and PCO2. For PO2 the limits of agreement of aVBG are similar to those of PO2 from CBGE for values below 75 mmHg and with mean bias close to zero. However, it has not been evaluated previously whether v-TAC software can be used to calculate ABG values from CBGE (aCBGE) or CBGF (aCBGF). As CBGE and CBGF values are much closer to ABG values, compared to VBG values, the agreement between aCBGE/aCBGF and ABG in terms of pH, PCO2 and pO2 might be better compared to CBG without mathematical arterialisation by v-TAC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study Arm

All patient will be included in this arm

Group Type OTHER

Study procedure

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

* Measurement of the flow rate of supplemental oxygen
* Measurement of the peripheral arterial saturation (SpO2) by pulse oximetry
* Taking of an ABG sample (ABG1) from the arterial line
* Taking of capillary blood gas analysis from the earlobe and from the finger tip
* Taking of an a second ABG (ABG2) from the arterial line

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Study procedure

* Measurement of the flow rate of supplemental oxygen
* Measurement of the peripheral arterial saturation (SpO2) by pulse oximetry
* Taking of an ABG sample (ABG1) from the arterial line
* Taking of capillary blood gas analysis from the earlobe and from the finger tip
* Taking of an a second ABG (ABG2) from the arterial line

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Admission to the intensive / intermediate care or weaning unit at the department of pneumology and intensive care medicine of the university hospital RWTH Aachen
* Arterial line inserted to monitor the patient's blood pressure or respiratory status
* Male or female aged ≥ 18 years
* Written informed consent prior to study participation
* The subject is willing and able to follow the procedures outlined in the protocol

Exclusion Criteria

* Hemodynamic instability
* Impaired perfusion of peripheral limbs e.g. due to severe heart failure
* Pregnant and lactating females. Pregnancy will be ruled out in females of childbearing age by pregnancy test.
* Patient has been committed to an institution by legal or regulatory order
* The subject is mentally or legally incapacitated
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

OBI Medical

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

RWTH Aachen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

PD Dr. Tobias Müller

Consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinic for pneumology and internal intensive care

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tobias Müller, PD Dr. med.

Role: CONTACT

+492418036470

Ayham Daher, Dr. med.

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michael Dreher, Univ.-Prof. Dr. med.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-125

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.