Pressure Gradient for Venous Return in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04030221

Last Updated: 2019-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-20

Study Completion Date

2019-08-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Surgical patients, especially those with insufficient blood volume and hypotension, often need fluid therapy. However, there is still a lack of simple and reliable indicators for judging transfusion responsiveness in some types of surgery. Previous studies have shown that Pressure Gradient for Venous Return (PVR) can be used to guide infusion. Thus, our aim is to explore the relationship between PVR and liquid reactivity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fluid resuscitation is one of the key issues in the management of surgery and anesthesia. Fluid infusion test is a method to determine patients' reactivity to liquid therapy. The commonly used Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) and Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) are good predictors of fluid responsiveness, but they are not suitable for operations with increased intra-abdominal pressure, such as laparoscopy surgery. Some studies have shown that Pressure Gradient for Venous Return (PVR) may has the same effect as PPV/SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness (FR). In the case that PPV/SVV cannot be used, PVR may be used alternatively. Therefore, our aim is to explore the relationship between the changes of PVR and fluid responsiveness during liquid infusion and to determine relevant parameters.

We will choose patients planed to receive laparoscopic surgery and general anesthesia, especially the patients with gastrointestinal tumors because of generally long operation time and much infusion volume. In our hospital, these patients will routinely indwelled arterial catheters and deep venous catheters during the operation. The former is mainly used to monitor direct arterial pressure, and the latter is used for fluid infusion.Through the above two pathways, we can collect the hemodynamic parameters of patients, and then establish the relationship between PVR and FR.

In our study, a good FR was defined as a 10% increase in cardiac index (CI) after fluid infusion, and PVR is calculated by a special formula based on some specific parameters of hemodynamics.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fluid Responsiveness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fluid infusion

250 ml of liquid will be given within 10 minutes for each patients, and the hemodynamic parameters before and after fluid infusion will be recorded. Then the experiment is completed.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery and general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* cardiac insufficiency; severe arrhythmias; patients using intra-aortic balloon pump; use of left ventricular assist devices; spasm of peripheral arteries caused by some factor
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yan Min, Doctor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yan Min, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

+86-13757118632

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-153

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.