The Use of Tidal Volume Challenge of Dynamic Parameters During Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT03467711
Last Updated: 2019-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
42 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-03-16
2018-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Many studies have reported that less invasive dynamic indices such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), which are derived from the arterial pressure waveform, are superior to static indices to predict fluid responsiveness. PPV and SVV are based on the heart-lung interaction and reflect cyclic changes in stroke volume induced by mechanical ventilation in the closed-chest condition. Therefore, their ability to predict fluid responsiveness can be affected by factors that influence the arterial tone or the compliance of the respiratory system.
Laparoscopic surgery for the abdominal visceral organs requires pneumoperitoneum and the Trendelenburg position to optimize surgical conditions, and can reduce cardiac output and respiratory compliance. Accordingly, the usefulness of PPV and SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness during laparoscopic surgery under these conditions may be questioned.
It has been clearly shown that the values of dynamic parameters are significantly correlated with the magnitude of VT. Min et al. reported that augmentation of PPV and SVV via a temporary increase in VT from 8 to 12 ml/kg improved their predictive power in the inconclusive zone with respect to fluid responsiveness (PPV values of 9% and 13%, respectively). Another recent study reported that on increasing VT from 6 to 8 ml/kg, augmented PPV and SVV, as well as their absolute changes, predicted fluid responsiveness with high sensitivity and specificity, even in critically ill patients receiving low VT.
Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate whether increasing VT from 6 to 8 ml/kg would improve the predictive power of PPV and SVV in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position under lung-protective ventilation. We also assessed the ability of absolute changes in PPV and SVV values induced by a temporary increase in VT from 6 to 8 ml/kg to predict fluid responsiveness.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Positive End-expiratory Pressure-induced Increase in Central Venous Pressure as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT02977143
Predictive Variables of the Hemodynamic Effect During the Laparoscopic Surgery in Children
NCT02536521
Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) to Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Cardiac Displacement in Patients Undergoing Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (OPCAB)
NCT01041742
Assessments of Dynamic Variables of Fluid Responsiveness to Predict Desufflation-induced Hypotension in Urologic Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT03967119
The Utility of Pulse Pressure Variation to Predict the Fluid Responsiveness During Pneumoperitoneum and Reverse-Trendelenburg Position
NCT02771067
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
tidal volume challenge
transiently increasing tidal volume from 6 to 8 mL/kg predicted body weight (tidal volume challenge)
volume expansion
give 6ml/kg (predicted body weight) volulyte for 10min
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe bradycardia
* Moderate to severe valvular disease
* left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50%
* Poorly controlled hypertension (systolic BP \> 160 mmHg)
* Patients with renal insufficiency (creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dL)
* Moderate to severe liver disease
* BMI \>.30 or \< 15 kg/ m2
* preexisting pulmonary disease
* FEV1 \< 60% of predicted value
* contraindications to oesophageal Doppler (OED) monitoring probe insertion (i.e. oesophageal stent, carcinoma of the oesophagus or pharynx, previous oesophageal surgery, oesophageal stricture, oesophageal varices, pharyngeal pouch, and severe coagulopathy)
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jun joohyun
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jun JH, Chung RK, Baik HJ, Chung MH, Hyeon JS, Lee YG, Park SH. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0807-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-009-003-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.