Automated Versus Manual Fluid Management for High Risk Abdominal Surgical Patient. A Prospective, Randomized Trial

NCT ID: NCT01950845

Last Updated: 2025-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dynamic parameters like pulse pressure variation have been shown to be accurate predictors of fluid responsiveness. Hemodynamic optimization based on fluid management and stroke volume optimization have been shown to improve patient outcomes, especially for moderate and high risk abdominal surgical patients. A novel closed-loop fluid administration system based on multi-parameter hemodynamic monitoring have been described recently. This prospective, randomized, surgeon and patient blinded study aims at comparing the cardiac output provided by either this closed-loop system or the anesthesiologist team in high-rish surgical patient elected for abdominal surgery at Pierre Bénite University Hospital, Hospices Civils of Lyon, France. Primary endpoint is the mean indexed cardiac output during surgery per group. We will also compare hemodynamic parameter (cardiac output, stroke volume, blood pressure heart rate…) and patient's outcomes (morbidity, mortality, transfusion rate, hospital length of stay) between groups

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Abdominal Surgery Colorectal Surgery Hepatectomy Pancreatectomy Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

anesthesiology, Closed-Loop system, automated fluid management, cardiac output optimization, high risk surgical patient, major abdominal surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Automated fluid management system (Closed-loop system)

cardiac output Vigileo® (Edwards Lifesciences) monitoring is connected to the closed loop system that will automatically provide per operative fluid bolus to optimize cardiac output by automated detection of fluid responsiveness state.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Closed loop automated System (LIR®: learning intravenous resuscitator)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Connection of the system to the patient under supervision of the anesthesiologist team during all the anesthesia procedure, respective of the applicability criteria for the fluid responsiveness detection.

Current practice manual fluid management

cardiac output Vigileo® (Edwards Lifesciences) monitoring will be used to help the anesthesiologist team to detect fluid responsiveness state for the manual fluid management optimization

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

manual current practice by anesthesiologist team

Intervention Type DEVICE

The anesthesiologist team will manage the fluid administration during all the anesthesia procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Closed loop automated System (LIR®: learning intravenous resuscitator)

Connection of the system to the patient under supervision of the anesthesiologist team during all the anesthesia procedure, respective of the applicability criteria for the fluid responsiveness detection.

Intervention Type DEVICE

manual current practice by anesthesiologist team

The anesthesiologist team will manage the fluid administration during all the anesthesia procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elective major abdominal surgery
* Patient physical status ASA 2-4
* General anesthesia with positive pressure ventilation
* High risk surgical patient with a per operative Vigileo® cardiac output monitoring decided a priori.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant female
* Intraoperative hyperthermic chemotherapy procedure
* Patient physical status ASA more than 4
* Patient with allergy to hydroxyethyl starch
* Cardiac arrhythmia
* ventilation with tidal volume inferior 7mL/Kg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Irvine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lilot M, Bellon A, Gueugnon M, Laplace MC, Baffeleuf B, Hacquard P, Barthomeuf F, Parent C, Tran T, Soubirou JL, Robinson P, Bouvet L, Vassal O, Lehot JJ, Piriou V. Comparison of cardiac output optimization with an automated closed-loop goal-directed fluid therapy versus non standardized manual fluid administration during elective abdominal surgery: first prospective randomized controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Dec;32(6):993-1003. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0106-7. Epub 2018 Jan 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29380190 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012.770

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id