Respiratory Variation of Carotid Doppler Peak Velocity (CDPV) for Non-invasive Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness
NCT ID: NCT05185141
Last Updated: 2024-10-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
84 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-11
2025-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-invasive Assessment of Arterial Blood Pressure and Functional Hemodynamic Parameters
NCT01292759
Point Of Care Ultrasound For Prediction Of Fluid Responsiveness in Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery
NCT05968040
Arterial dP/dt Dependency on Loading Conditions
NCT06164405
Cardiac Output Response to Vasopressin Infusion In Abdominal Surgery Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation
NCT04935814
Fluid Management Study to Evaluate Changes in Intravascular Volume After Applying Various Pressure Levels on the Caval Vein
NCT01388998
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Likewise in another study ∆CDPV has been shown to be superior to stroke volume variation (∆SV) for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock when ventilated with a tidal volume of ≥8ml/ kg.
All in all respiratory variation of carotid doppler peak velocity (∆CDPV) seems to be a promising parameter for prediction of fluid responsiveness (Yao et al., BMC Anesthesiology 2018). However, so far clinical studies have been conducted only under a small number of patients mainly in the intensive care unit and/ or under highly specific conditions (e.g. cardiac surgery).
If ∆CDPV is able to predict fluid responsiveness with high accuracy intraoperatively remains unknown. The investigators are therefore conducting this prospective monocentric observational trial to evaluate the performance of ∆CDPV during major abdominal surgery and compare it to validated fluid responsiveness monitoring parameters ∆PP and corrected flow time (fTc).
Following IRB-approval and written informed consent 84 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery will be enrolled in the study. Stroke volume will be monitored by Esophageal Doppler Monitoring (CardioQ-ODM®, Deltex Medical Ltd, Chichester, UK). In case of hypovolemia a fluid bolus of 7 ml/kg ideal body weight will be administered at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Respiratory variation of carotid doppler peak velocity (∆CDPV) will be monitored before and 1 minute after completion of each fluid bolus using an ultrasound device with a common linear array transducer (Philips ClearVue 350, Philips Medizin Systeme GmbH, Boeblingen, Germany).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* written informed consent
* scheduled major abdominal surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
* SIRS or sepsis
* any kind of cardiac arrhythmia
* known valve disease
* known heart failure
* any kind of known carotid stenosis
* carotid doppler peak velocity \>182 cm/s before baseline measurement (expected stenosis)
* missing indication for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring (IBP) not related to the study
* peripheral artery disease (PAD)
* BMI \> 35 kg/m2
* intraabdominal hypertension
* ASA-PSC of 4
* severe lung disease (e.g. COPD grade 3, fibrosis)
* esophageal disease of any kind
* participation in another clinical study
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Johannes M Wirkus, MD
Principal Investigator Johannes Wirkus, M.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gunther J Pestel, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Dpt. of Anesthesiology
Kimiko Fukui-Dunkel, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Dpt. of Anesthesiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Anesthesiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ibarra-Estrada MA, Lopez-Pulgarin JA, Mijangos-Mendez JC, Diaz-Gomez JL, Aguirre-Avalos G. Respiratory variation in carotid peak systolic velocity predicts volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: a prospective cohort study. Crit Ultrasound J. 2015 Dec;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13089-015-0029-1. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
Lu N, Xi X, Jiang L, Yang D, Yin K. Exploring the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;35(9):1258-1261. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.052. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
Yao B, Liu JY, Sun YB. Respiratory variation in peripheral arterial blood flow peak velocity to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Nov 13;18(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0635-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21-02546
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.