Heart Rate During Exercise in Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT03917576

Last Updated: 2019-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-04

Study Completion Date

2018-04-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Exercise training is a cornerstone for the prevention and treatment of metabolic disorders and associated cardiometabolic complications such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and hypertension. Similar to the beneficial health effects after performing conventional continuous exercise modalities, high intensity interval training (HIIT) has been reported as an effective alternative exercise-modality to improve glucose homeostasis in both prediabetes subjects and individuals with T2D diagnosed. In this regard, although multiple HIIT-based interventions commonly report acute and long term benefits on body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness and insulin sensitivity in metabolically compromised subjects, little is known about the acute cardiovascular response (i.e., at heart rate level) during HIIT in subjects with different glucose control.

HIIT is described as performing brief periods of exercise at vigorous or maximal intensity, interspersed with inactive or low intensity recovery phases of variable duration. In order to characterize different HIIT-based protocols, exercise intensity is usually defined as relative percentages of individual maximal cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) or relative maximal power output values. Nevertheless, the need for specific technological equipment to assess these parameters usually limit the prescription and recommendations of HIIT in clinical settings and other public health contexts at massive level. Additionally, the use of self-perceived exertion scales and heart rate (HR) variations upon HIIT have been demonstrating to be accessible and feasible strategies to regulate exercise intensity during HIIT. For example, it was reported that HR and self-perceived exertion scores increased progressively in T2D subjects, parallel to the oxygen consumption rate throughout an acute HIIT session performed on cycle ergometer. Consequently, it is conceivable to hypothesize that determining HR variations during HIIT might optimize the recommendation of this training methodology in metabolically compromised subjects as those at risk or with T2D diagnosed. Therefore, the aim of the present study was To describe and compare the acute heart rate changes in response to an incremental maximal exercise test and a single HIIT session between normoglycaemic (NG), prediabetes (Pre-T2D) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) subjects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This cross-sectional study will use a non-probabilistic sample of 75 adult subjects, characterized as healthy normoglycaemic and others with disturbed glucose homeostasis subjects, all referred by a physician to the exercise programme of our research centre. The present study will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee of the Universidad de La Frontera. All volunteers read and signed an informed consent. The inclusion criteria will be; a) aged 18-60 y; b) previously screened by physician professional; c) diagnosed with normoglycaemic, prediabetes or T2D state; d) and living in Temuco city. The exclusion criteria will be; a) low maximal cardiorespiratory fitness (defined as VO2max ≤21 ml/kg-1/min-1) below the expected value for the subject's sex and age 11; b) not receiving pharmacologic hypotensive treatment with β-blockers; and c) having no musculoskeletal limitations to perform exercise cycling. The total sample size will be divided in three groups according to the standard glycaemic classification 12; normoglycaemic (NG, n = 32), pre-diabetes (Pre-T2D, n = 30) and type 2 diabetes (T2D, n = 13). The study considered three stages of measurements (enrollment, exercise test, single HIIT session).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type2 Diabetes Mellitus Hyperglycemia Heart Rate Exercise Training

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

We will compare a type 2 diabetes mellitus group during exercise, with another hyperglicaemic, and normoglicaemic group in the heart rate maxymum.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
The exercise session consisted of 1-minute cycling at high intensity (workload during each interval was set at \~80-100 % maximal power (i.e., load in Watts) achieved during the incremental exercise test with a workload that allowed to work until the volitional muscle failure in 1-minute), followed by 2-minutes of inactive resting period (sitting still on the cycle ergometer), and was repeated 10 times (1x2x10 protocol; 1:2:10 to work:rest:repetitions respectively). The exercise session was supervised individually by exercise professionals, monitoring the heart rate with a continuous telemetric heart rate sensor (Polar FT4, PolarTM, Finland). During the single HIIT session, the HR pre each interval (HR-preINT) and the HR post each interval (HR-postINT) of cycling was recorded individually. In addition, we calculated and report the percentage of maximum heart rate in each interval, delta of HR increment and delta HR recovery for each 10-interval HIIT are reported.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Normoglicamic group

Control normoglycaemic participants

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Exercise training intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects also participated in a single HIIT session composed of 10-cycling intervals, using a Lode Corival cycle ergometer. The exercise session consisted of 1-minute cycling at high intensity (workload during each interval was set at \~80-100 % maximal power achieved during the incremental exercise test with a workload that allowed to work until the volitional muscle failure in 1-minute), followed by 2-minutes of inactive resting period (sitting still on the cycle ergometer), and was repeated 10 times (1x2x10 protocol; 1:2:10 to work:rest:repetitions respectively).

Hyperglicaemic group

Control hyperglicaemic group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Exercise training intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects also participated in a single HIIT session composed of 10-cycling intervals, using a Lode Corival cycle ergometer. The exercise session consisted of 1-minute cycling at high intensity (workload during each interval was set at \~80-100 % maximal power achieved during the incremental exercise test with a workload that allowed to work until the volitional muscle failure in 1-minute), followed by 2-minutes of inactive resting period (sitting still on the cycle ergometer), and was repeated 10 times (1x2x10 protocol; 1:2:10 to work:rest:repetitions respectively).

Experimental group

Experimental Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral

Intervention Type OTHER

The resting heart rate (HRrest), maximum HR (HRmax), HR recovery (HRRTEST), delta HR recovery (ΔHRRTEST) were measured by continuous telemetric heart rate sensor (Polar FT4, PolarTM, Finland) during an incremental exercise test designed to obtain maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) on a cycle ergometer (Lode Corival, Groningen, The Netherlands) similar with previous studies using similar cohort. An indirect calorimetry/ergospirometry system (Ultima CPXTM metabolic system, Medgraphics, Minnesota, USA) was used to measure VO2max until volitional exhaustion. Thus, the modified Astrand volitional protocol was applied in the participants of all NG, Pre-T2D and T2D groups increasing the load (i.e., Watts) 25 W each 2 min to women, and 50 W each 2 min to men.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Behavioral

The resting heart rate (HRrest), maximum HR (HRmax), HR recovery (HRRTEST), delta HR recovery (ΔHRRTEST) were measured by continuous telemetric heart rate sensor (Polar FT4, PolarTM, Finland) during an incremental exercise test designed to obtain maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) on a cycle ergometer (Lode Corival, Groningen, The Netherlands) similar with previous studies using similar cohort. An indirect calorimetry/ergospirometry system (Ultima CPXTM metabolic system, Medgraphics, Minnesota, USA) was used to measure VO2max until volitional exhaustion. Thus, the modified Astrand volitional protocol was applied in the participants of all NG, Pre-T2D and T2D groups increasing the load (i.e., Watts) 25 W each 2 min to women, and 50 W each 2 min to men.

Intervention Type OTHER

Exercise training intervention

Subjects also participated in a single HIIT session composed of 10-cycling intervals, using a Lode Corival cycle ergometer. The exercise session consisted of 1-minute cycling at high intensity (workload during each interval was set at \~80-100 % maximal power achieved during the incremental exercise test with a workload that allowed to work until the volitional muscle failure in 1-minute), followed by 2-minutes of inactive resting period (sitting still on the cycle ergometer), and was repeated 10 times (1x2x10 protocol; 1:2:10 to work:rest:repetitions respectively).

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Incremental exercise test Exercise training intervention with HIIT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aged 18-60 y
* previously screened by physician professional
* diagnosed with normoglycaemic, prediabetes or T2D state
* living in Temuco city

Exclusion Criteria

* low maximal cardiorespiratory fitness (defined as VO2max ≤21 ml/kg-1/min-1) below the expected value for the subject's sex and age
* not receiving pharmacologic hypotensive treatment with β-blockers
* having no musculoskeletal limitations to perform exercise cycling
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad de La Frontera

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidad de Los Lagos

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cristian ALvarez

Osorno, , Chile

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Chile

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RP010317

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.