A Gamified, Social Media Inspired Personalized Normative Feedback Alcohol Intervention for Sexual Minority Women
NCT ID: NCT03884478
Last Updated: 2023-03-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-06
2019-10-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preventing Alcohol Misuse and Consequences in Vulnerable Women
NCT05010187
Motivating Recruitment and Efficacy in Normative Feedback Interventions
NCT04639882
Online Program for Young Adult Veteran Drinkers
NCT02187887
A Social Media Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention for Heavy Drinking College Students
NCT05608109
Revolutionizing Normative Re-education
NCT04356261
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One round of the game is played each month over a 8 month period. Players are encouraged to browse player profiles before each round and it is made clear that the goal is to grow one's score by submitting accurate guesses and strategic bets on the responses of other players in one's age and sexual identity group. Each round includes questions about 2 to 3 topics ostensibly selected by a slot machine like spinner. For each topic, players make guesses about the behaviors and experiences of other players in their age and sexual identity group, choose amounts of points to bet on these guesses being true of the group, and then contribute to actual group norms by answering parallel questions. Each round is "open" for 30 days. Once closed, players are sent a text message containing a private link at which they can see detailed results (PNF) for the round, view the leaderboard and cash prize winner, and play the next round.
Packaging this intervention as a fun, identity-relevant competition for sexual minority women rather than a transparent alcohol intervention study allows feasibility and efficacy to be evaluated simultaneously, with a high degree of ecological validity. First, 1200 sexual minority women will be recruited to take part in the online competition. No participation-based incentives will be offered to players beyond the opportunity to compete for a variable cash prize each round. Then, following two initial rounds of play, a sub-sample of 500 drinkers will be invited to take part in an incentivized evaluation study after answering alcohol use questions in Round 3. Upon consenting to participate in the evaluation study, participants will be randomized to receive 1 of 3 unique sequences of feedback (i.e., Alcohol \& Stigma-Coping, Alcohol \& Control, or Control only) during intervention Rounds 3 and 4. Short-term reductions in alcohol use will be assessed in Round 6 of the competition where players will be prompted to guess, bet on, and answer alcohol use and control topic questions for a second time (i.e., Replay Bonus Round; 2 month follow-up). Following all rounds of the competition, a short survey will assess the alcohol use and negative consequences of Evaluation Study participants a final time (4 month follow-up).
Feasibility analysis will examine engagement with the online competition platform and sustainability of play in the absence of traditional study participation incentives among players not involved in the Evaluation Study. Efficacy analysis will focus on study participants randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 feedback conditions in order to: 1) evaluate whether PNF on alcohol use reduces sexual minority women's alcohol consumption and negative consequences relative to PNF on control topics; 2) examine whether providing PNF on stigma-coping behaviors in addition to alcohol use further reduces alcohol use and consequences beyond alcohol PNF; and, 3) identify mediators and moderators of intervention effectiveness.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Alcohol + Stigma Coping PNF
Participants randomized to this condition will receive gamified personalized normative feedback on their alcohol use after answering questions about alcohol use and two control topics in Round 3. Then, in the very next Round of the competition (Round 4), these participants will receive gamified personalized normative feedback on their stigma coping behaviors after answering questions about their stigma coping behaviors and two control topics.
Personalized Normative Feedback
Personalized Normative Feedback (PNF) is a popular social norms-based intervention strategy which presents individuals with a personalized, individual report designed to correct misperceived peer norms using a graphical display. Bar charts compare actual alcohol use statistics for the peer group to A) participants' estimates of peer drinking and, B) their own self-reported drinking.
Alcohol + Control PNF
Participants randomized to this condition will receive gamified personalized normative feedback on their alcohol use after answering questions about alcohol use and control topics in Round 3. Then, in the very next Round of the competition (Round 4), these participants will receive gamified personalized normative feedback on one control topic (Relationships) after answering questions about their stigma coping behaviors and two control topics.
Personalized Normative Feedback
Personalized Normative Feedback (PNF) is a popular social norms-based intervention strategy which presents individuals with a personalized, individual report designed to correct misperceived peer norms using a graphical display. Bar charts compare actual alcohol use statistics for the peer group to A) participants' estimates of peer drinking and, B) their own self-reported drinking.
Control PNF
Participants randomized to the control arm will answer questions about the same topics as participants in the other conditions in Round 3 (Alcohol Use \& Control) and Round 4 (Stigma-Coping \& Control). However, in both Rounds 3 and 4 they will receive gamified PNF on control topics.
Personalized Normative Feedback
Personalized Normative Feedback (PNF) is a popular social norms-based intervention strategy which presents individuals with a personalized, individual report designed to correct misperceived peer norms using a graphical display. Bar charts compare actual alcohol use statistics for the peer group to A) participants' estimates of peer drinking and, B) their own self-reported drinking.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Personalized Normative Feedback
Personalized Normative Feedback (PNF) is a popular social norms-based intervention strategy which presents individuals with a personalized, individual report designed to correct misperceived peer norms using a graphical display. Bar charts compare actual alcohol use statistics for the peer group to A) participants' estimates of peer drinking and, B) their own self-reported drinking.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Accept the competition's Terms of Service \& Privacy Policy
* Endorses a lesbian, bisexual, or queer female sexual identity
* Is between the ages of 21 and 55 years
* Has consumed 3 or more drinks on at least one occasion during the previous 2 months OR consumes alcohol 3 or more days per week
* Lives in North America (US or Canada)
* Does not have a partner or housemate participating
* Accepts invitation and consents to participate in the Evaluation Study
Exclusion Criteria
* Does not accept the competition's Terms of Service \& Privacy Policy
* Is younger than 21 years of age or older than 55 years of age.
* Has NOT consumed 3 or more drinks on at least one occasion during the previous 2 months AND drinks less than 3 days per week
* Lives outside of North America
* Has a partner or housemate participating
* Declines invitation
* Does not consent to participate in the Evaluation Study
21 Years
55 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
NIH
Loyola Marymount University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Loyola Marymount University
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Boyle SC, LaBrie JW. A Gamified, Social Media-Inspired, Web-Based Personalized Normative Feedback Alcohol Intervention for Lesbian, Bisexual, and Queer-Identified Women: Protocol for a Hybrid Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Apr 16;10(4):e24647. doi: 10.2196/24647.
Boyle SC, LaBrie JW, Trager BM, Costine LD. A Gamified Personalized Normative Feedback App to Reduce Drinking Among Sexual Minority Women: Randomized Controlled Trial and Feasibility Study. J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 13;24(5):e34853. doi: 10.2196/34853.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.