Erector Spinae vs Fascia Iliaca Block in Hip Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT03860324

Last Updated: 2021-08-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block was first described by Forero et al in September 2016. In their article, the authors presented the possibility of using this block as an option for the control of thoracic neuropathic pain as well as post-operative thoracic pain. The ESP block is done by administering local anesthetic in the plane deep to the erector spinae muscle, which spreads through the costotransverse foramen to the dorsal and ventral roots of the spinal nerves.

Since then, there have been reports about the successful use of this block for bariatric surgery, ventral hernia repair, radical mastectomy, rib fractures, major abdominal surgery and hip replacement. However, there are no studies in the literature comparing the efficacy of the ESP block to other nerve blocks.

The purpose of this study is to compare the post-operative analgesic efficacy of the ESP block to the fascia iliaca (FI) block after total hip replacement (THR).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control-group

No peripheral nerve block

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Single-shot erector spinae plane block

The patient is positioned in lateral decubitus. The anesthesiologist uses a linear high-frequency probe in a longitudinal direction laterally to the mid-sagittal plane at the level of L4 until the transverse process is identified and, more superficial, the erector spinae muscle. A 22G needle of 80mm is introduced in-plane craniocaudally towards the transverse process of L4 until its tip is in the plane deep to the erector spinae muscle. Single-shot block with 30ml of ropivacaine 0,5% + adrenaline 100mcg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Single-shot erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Single-shot Erector Spinae Plane block with 30ml of ropivacaine 0,5% + adrenaline 150mcg.

Single-shot fascia iliaca block

The patient is positioned in dorsal decubitus. The anesthesiologist uses a linear high-frequency probe in a transversal direction, below the crural arch so as to identify the femoral artery. Afterwards the probe is moved laterally to find the iliac muscle and its fascia. A 22G needle of 80mm is introduced in-plane latero-medially until its tip is below the fascia iliaca (between the muscle and its fascia). Single-shot block with 40ml of ropivacaine 0,2%.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Single-shot fascia iliaca block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Single-shot Fascia Iliaca block with 40ml of ropivacaine 0,2%

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single-shot erector spinae plane block

Single-shot Erector Spinae Plane block with 30ml of ropivacaine 0,5% + adrenaline 150mcg.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Single-shot fascia iliaca block

Single-shot Fascia Iliaca block with 40ml of ropivacaine 0,2%

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Surgical plan for total hip replacement
* Signing of consent form to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* BMI \> 40 kg/m2
* Surgical plan for revision of hip replacement
* Patient unable to quantify pain level
* Chronic kidney disease with a Glomerular Filtration Rate \< 50ml/min
* Previously medicated with opioids
* Patient unable to perform the surgery with spinal block
* Allergy to local anesthetics
* Infection in the site of the Erector Spinae Plane or Fascia Iliaca block
* Allergy or contraindication to the use of morphine
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Beatriz Ângelo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

André Carrão

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

André Carrão

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Beatriz Ângelo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Beatriz Ângelo

Loures, Lisbon District, Portugal

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Portugal

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

45149

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison Between 2 Techniques for Lumbar-ESPB
NCT07104097 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block Volunteer Study
NCT04401007 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA