Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Percutaneous Arthrodesis of Spinal Fractures
NCT ID: NCT06200298
Last Updated: 2024-05-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
86 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-11
2026-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a loco-regional anesthesia technique first described in 2016.
A retrospective cohort study showed an improvement in post-operative analgesia of percutaneous osteosynthesis spinal surgery through a reduction in 24-hour morphine use.
In order to prove and confirm the effectiveness of this technique, we will conduct a double-blind randomized controlled study.
The objective will be to demonstrate the analgesic effectiveness of the technique by reducing morphine consumption in post-operative. The expected reduction in morphine consumption is set at 30%, based on the clinical experience developed in our practice.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block Volunteer Study
NCT04401007
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block: Cadaveric Study
NCT04166188
Comparative Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of L-ESPB Versus Absence of Locoregional Block in Hip Surgery
NCT06567522
Erectus Nerve Block for Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT04473508
Comparison of Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Versus ESP Block for Rib Fracture Analgesia
NCT04707183
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Erector spinae plane block with naropeine [3,75 mg/mL]
Experimental group: Erector spinae plane block with naropeine \[3,75 mg/mL\]
Erector spinae plane block with naropeine [3,75 mg/mL]
Erector spinae plane block Procedure:
* Ultrasound scan with protective sleeve and sterile gel. Research of the thoracic spine process between T8 (for thoracic arthrodesis) and T12 (for lumbar arthrodesis)
* Once the thorny process is identified, horizontal shift to the transverse process.
* When the transverse process is spotted, sagittal rotation of the ultrasound probe
* Skin puncture with an 80 mm hyperechogenic needle in the plane of the ultrasound probe. The needle will be placed in contact with the transverse process
* Injection, after aspiration, of the solution prepared blindly by the anesthesiologist performing the procedure. For the ESPB group, a long-acting local anaesthetic: ropivacaine 3.75 mg/mL, 30 mL.
* Repetition of the gesture for the transverse controlateral process
Control group : ESPB with saline 0,9%
ESPB with saline 0,9%
Procedure for the Erector spinae plane block Procedure by NaCl 0.9%:
* Ultrasound scan with protective sleeve and sterile gel. Research of the thoracic spine process between T8 (for thoracic arthrodesis) and T12 (for lumbar arthrodesis)
* Once the thorny process is identified, horizontal shift to the transverse process.
* When the transverse process is spotted, sagittal rotation of the ultrasound probe
* Skin puncture with an 80 mm hyperechogenic needle in the plane of the ultrasound probe. The needle will be placed in contact with the transverse process
* Injection, after aspiration, of the solution prepared blindly by the anesthesiologist performing the procedure. For the control group: saline isotonic serum 30 mL.
Repetition of the gesture for the transverse controlateral process
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erector spinae plane block with naropeine [3,75 mg/mL]
Erector spinae plane block Procedure:
* Ultrasound scan with protective sleeve and sterile gel. Research of the thoracic spine process between T8 (for thoracic arthrodesis) and T12 (for lumbar arthrodesis)
* Once the thorny process is identified, horizontal shift to the transverse process.
* When the transverse process is spotted, sagittal rotation of the ultrasound probe
* Skin puncture with an 80 mm hyperechogenic needle in the plane of the ultrasound probe. The needle will be placed in contact with the transverse process
* Injection, after aspiration, of the solution prepared blindly by the anesthesiologist performing the procedure. For the ESPB group, a long-acting local anaesthetic: ropivacaine 3.75 mg/mL, 30 mL.
* Repetition of the gesture for the transverse controlateral process
ESPB with saline 0,9%
Procedure for the Erector spinae plane block Procedure by NaCl 0.9%:
* Ultrasound scan with protective sleeve and sterile gel. Research of the thoracic spine process between T8 (for thoracic arthrodesis) and T12 (for lumbar arthrodesis)
* Once the thorny process is identified, horizontal shift to the transverse process.
* When the transverse process is spotted, sagittal rotation of the ultrasound probe
* Skin puncture with an 80 mm hyperechogenic needle in the plane of the ultrasound probe. The needle will be placed in contact with the transverse process
* Injection, after aspiration, of the solution prepared blindly by the anesthesiologist performing the procedure. For the control group: saline isotonic serum 30 mL.
Repetition of the gesture for the transverse controlateral process
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Insured persons
3. Age 18 years
4. Being able to receive informed information
5. Have agreed to participate in writing
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient refusal
3. Pregnancy
4. Lack of social security coverage
5. Under guardianship or curatorship
6. Inability to express consent
7. History of spinal surgery
8. Unable to use morphine PCA
9. Contraindication to the use of local morphines and/or anesthetics
10. Contraindication to Loco-Regional Anesthesia
11. Long-term opioid patient (Level II and Level III analgesics)
12. Patient with preoperative neuropathic pain (score greater than or equal to 4 on the DN4 questionnaire or taking anti-epileptic or anti-depressant treatments for neuropathic pain)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Lille
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cédric CIRENEI, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Lille
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Roger Salengro
Lille, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-A00358-35
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2020_1299
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.