The Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT07017400

Last Updated: 2025-08-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-16

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the analgesic efficacy and postoperative recovery of two locoregional anesthesia combinations in patients \> 18 years (ASA I-III), scheduled for unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia with expected hospitalization \> 24 hours:

* ACB + sacral ESP block
* ACB + iPACK block

The main question it aims to answer is: Does the ACB + sacral ESP block combination produce effective postoperative recovery and analgesic effect?

Participants already taking ACB + sacral ESP block as part of their regular peri-operative care for TKA will be followed in the postoperative period for 48 hours.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a common orthopedic surgery in elderly patients, often requiring effective postoperative pain control to enhance recovery. Conventional locoregional techniques include adductor canal block (ACB) and the iPACK block (infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee). While effective, iPACK may carry infection risks due to its proximity to the surgical field.

The sacral ESP block is a more recent ultrasound-guided technique targeting posterior sacral nerve branches from a remote site, potentially avoiding motor weakness and surgical site complications. Early literature and local clinical experience suggest that combining sacral ESP with ACB may provide comparable analgesia to ACB+iPACK while offering practical and safety advantages.

Study Design:

* Type: Single-center, prospective, observational study
* Setting: Ospedale di Crotone, Italy
* Duration: Maximum of 30 months
* Sample size: 63 patients per group (based on QoR-15 score, with 80% power and α = 0.05)

Population:

* Adults \>18 years (ASA I-III), scheduled for unilateral TKA with expected hospitalization \>24 hours
* Exclusion: refusal of consent, contraindications to spinal or regional anesthesia, coagulation disorders, severe dementia, ongoing infection, or emergency surgeries

Primary Endpoint:

* Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) score at 24 hours post-surgery (score range 0-150; higher scores indicate better recovery)

Secondary Endpoints:

* Postoperative pain scores (NRS, score range 0-10, higher scores indicate more pain) at rest and movement (0-48 hours)
* Time to first mobilization
* Patient satisfaction (Likert scale)
* Analgesic consumption and time to first request
* Incidence of nausea, vomiting, antiemetic use
* Block-related complications or adverse events

Procedure:

All patients receive spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia (paracetamol, rescue tramadol). Regional blocks are performed under ultrasound guidance in aseptic conditions. ESP is performed at the S2 level with 20 mL ropivacaine 0.375%. ACB and iPACK are also administered per standard protocols.

Data Analysis:

Statistical comparisons between groups will be made using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests based on variable distribution. Repeated measures will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.

Ethics:

The study follows Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients provide written informed consent. Privacy and data confidentiality are ensured.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Knee Anthroplasty Regional Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ACB/iPACK

combination of adductor canal block (saphenous) and infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (iPACK) block

Local Anesthetic Injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

combination of regional blocks for TKA postoperative analgesia

ACB/sacral ESP

combination of adductor canal block (saphenous) and sacral erector spinae plane (ESP) block

Local Anesthetic Injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

combination of regional blocks for TKA postoperative analgesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Local Anesthetic Injection

combination of regional blocks for TKA postoperative analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults \>18 years
* ASA I-III
* scheduled for unilateral TKA with expected hospitalization \> 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal of consent
* Local anesthetics allergies
* contraindications to spinal or regional anesthesia
* coagulation disorders
* anticoagulation/antiaggregation medications
* dementia
* ASA-PS \> III
* ongoing infection
* emergency surgeries
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

San Giovanni di Dio Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tommaso Sorrentino

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Giovanni Crotone Hospital

Crotone, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tommaso Sorrentino, Anesthesiology

Role: CONTACT

+393277038017

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tommaso Sorrentino, M.D.

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marrone F, Fusco P, Paventi S, Pullano C. Combined adductor canal (ACB) and sacral erector spinae plane (S-ESP) blocks for total knee arthroplasty pain in hemophilic arthropathy. Saudi J Anaesth. 2024 Oct-Dec;18(4):565-568. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_177_24. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39600436 (View on PubMed)

Marrone F, Pullano C, Paventi S, Tomei M, Fusco P. A unilateral single level sacral erector spinae plane block for total knee arthroplasty pain. Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Jul-Aug;90(7-8):707-708. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18046-7. Epub 2024 Feb 29. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38421355 (View on PubMed)

Marrone F, Fusco P, Paventi S, Tomei M, Lolli S, Chironna E, Pullano C. Combined lumbar and sacral erector spinae plane (LS-ESP) block for hip fracture pain and surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Jul-Aug;90(7-8):712-714. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18093-5. Epub 2024 Apr 24. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38656087 (View on PubMed)

Marrone F, Paventi S, Tomei M, Failli S, Crecco S, Pullano C. Unilateral sacral erector spinae plane block for hip fracture surgery. Anaesth Rep. 2024 Jan 3;12(1):e12269. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12269. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38187935 (View on PubMed)

Satici MH, Tutar MS, Tire Y, Binici O, Cicekler O, Korkmaz E, Pekince O, Kozanhan B. The effect of sacral erector spinae plane block on the quality of recovery after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2025 Apr;91(4):278-285. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18353-8. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39495168 (View on PubMed)

Tulgar S, Senturk O, Thomas DT, Deveci U, Ozer Z. A new technique for sensory blockage of posterior branches of sacral nerves: Ultrasound guided sacral erector spinae plane block. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:129-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 Apr 15. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30999197 (View on PubMed)

Lavand'homme PM, Kehlet H, Rawal N, Joshi GP; PROSPECT Working Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA). Pain management after total knee arthroplasty: PROcedure SPEcific Postoperative Pain ManagemenT recommendations. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Sep 1;39(9):743-757. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001691. Epub 2022 Jul 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35852550 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

143/2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison Between 2 Techniques for Lumbar-ESPB
NCT07104097 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Adductor Canal Block
NCT04513145 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3