The Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT07017400
Last Updated: 2025-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
126 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-16
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* ACB + sacral ESP block
* ACB + iPACK block
The main question it aims to answer is: Does the ACB + sacral ESP block combination produce effective postoperative recovery and analgesic effect?
Participants already taking ACB + sacral ESP block as part of their regular peri-operative care for TKA will be followed in the postoperative period for 48 hours.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ACB With S-ESPB Versus ACB With iPACK for Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07288970
Erector Spinae Plane Block Vs. IPACK Block with Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06233630
The Analgesic Effect of Combined Nerve Block and Systemic High Dose Glucocorticoid After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
NCT02374008
BLOCK-study: Better Local Orthopedic Pain Control After Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06746168
Single-injection Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia
NCT04400708
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The sacral ESP block is a more recent ultrasound-guided technique targeting posterior sacral nerve branches from a remote site, potentially avoiding motor weakness and surgical site complications. Early literature and local clinical experience suggest that combining sacral ESP with ACB may provide comparable analgesia to ACB+iPACK while offering practical and safety advantages.
Study Design:
* Type: Single-center, prospective, observational study
* Setting: Ospedale di Crotone, Italy
* Duration: Maximum of 30 months
* Sample size: 63 patients per group (based on QoR-15 score, with 80% power and α = 0.05)
Population:
* Adults \>18 years (ASA I-III), scheduled for unilateral TKA with expected hospitalization \>24 hours
* Exclusion: refusal of consent, contraindications to spinal or regional anesthesia, coagulation disorders, severe dementia, ongoing infection, or emergency surgeries
Primary Endpoint:
* Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) score at 24 hours post-surgery (score range 0-150; higher scores indicate better recovery)
Secondary Endpoints:
* Postoperative pain scores (NRS, score range 0-10, higher scores indicate more pain) at rest and movement (0-48 hours)
* Time to first mobilization
* Patient satisfaction (Likert scale)
* Analgesic consumption and time to first request
* Incidence of nausea, vomiting, antiemetic use
* Block-related complications or adverse events
Procedure:
All patients receive spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia (paracetamol, rescue tramadol). Regional blocks are performed under ultrasound guidance in aseptic conditions. ESP is performed at the S2 level with 20 mL ropivacaine 0.375%. ACB and iPACK are also administered per standard protocols.
Data Analysis:
Statistical comparisons between groups will be made using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests based on variable distribution. Repeated measures will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.
Ethics:
The study follows Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients provide written informed consent. Privacy and data confidentiality are ensured.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ACB/iPACK
combination of adductor canal block (saphenous) and infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (iPACK) block
Local Anesthetic Injection
combination of regional blocks for TKA postoperative analgesia
ACB/sacral ESP
combination of adductor canal block (saphenous) and sacral erector spinae plane (ESP) block
Local Anesthetic Injection
combination of regional blocks for TKA postoperative analgesia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Local Anesthetic Injection
combination of regional blocks for TKA postoperative analgesia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA I-III
* scheduled for unilateral TKA with expected hospitalization \> 24 hours
Exclusion Criteria
* Local anesthetics allergies
* contraindications to spinal or regional anesthesia
* coagulation disorders
* anticoagulation/antiaggregation medications
* dementia
* ASA-PS \> III
* ongoing infection
* emergency surgeries
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
San Giovanni di Dio Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tommaso Sorrentino
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
San Giovanni Crotone Hospital
Crotone, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Tommaso Sorrentino, M.D.
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Marrone F, Fusco P, Paventi S, Pullano C. Combined adductor canal (ACB) and sacral erector spinae plane (S-ESP) blocks for total knee arthroplasty pain in hemophilic arthropathy. Saudi J Anaesth. 2024 Oct-Dec;18(4):565-568. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_177_24. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
Marrone F, Pullano C, Paventi S, Tomei M, Fusco P. A unilateral single level sacral erector spinae plane block for total knee arthroplasty pain. Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Jul-Aug;90(7-8):707-708. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18046-7. Epub 2024 Feb 29. No abstract available.
Marrone F, Fusco P, Paventi S, Tomei M, Lolli S, Chironna E, Pullano C. Combined lumbar and sacral erector spinae plane (LS-ESP) block for hip fracture pain and surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Jul-Aug;90(7-8):712-714. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18093-5. Epub 2024 Apr 24. No abstract available.
Marrone F, Paventi S, Tomei M, Failli S, Crecco S, Pullano C. Unilateral sacral erector spinae plane block for hip fracture surgery. Anaesth Rep. 2024 Jan 3;12(1):e12269. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12269. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
Satici MH, Tutar MS, Tire Y, Binici O, Cicekler O, Korkmaz E, Pekince O, Kozanhan B. The effect of sacral erector spinae plane block on the quality of recovery after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2025 Apr;91(4):278-285. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18353-8. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
Tulgar S, Senturk O, Thomas DT, Deveci U, Ozer Z. A new technique for sensory blockage of posterior branches of sacral nerves: Ultrasound guided sacral erector spinae plane block. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:129-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 Apr 15. No abstract available.
Lavand'homme PM, Kehlet H, Rawal N, Joshi GP; PROSPECT Working Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA). Pain management after total knee arthroplasty: PROcedure SPEcific Postoperative Pain ManagemenT recommendations. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Sep 1;39(9):743-757. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001691. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
143/2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.