Comparison of Combination of Proximal ACB and iPACK With Large-Volume Distal ACB for Early Mobilization After TKR
NCT ID: NCT06525493
Last Updated: 2024-07-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-06-01
2024-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Analgesic Effect of Adductor Canal Block, IPACK Block, and Genicular Nerve Block
NCT06686095
Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks Vs. Low Dose Femoral Nerve Blocks For Early Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02453321
Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy Between Adductor Canal Block + IPACK Block and Adductor Canal Block + Genicular Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07324486
Adductor Canal Block Combined With IPACK vs Genicular Nerves Block in Knee Arthroscopy
NCT05269095
Analgesic Efficacy of Anterior Femoral, Genicular and Adductor Canal Nerve Block
NCT02548104
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Patients receive the large-volume distal adductor canal block (ACB). In this technique, a linear transducer is placed on the medial aspect, approximately one fourth of the distal thigh to identify the Adductor Hiatus, and the injection is performed in-plane near that point using ropivacaine.
Regional Anesthesia
The interventions are three different regional anesthesia techniques: Proximal Adductor Canal Block (ACB), iPACK (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee), and Large-Volume Distal Adductor Canal Block (Large ACB distal). all three interventions were administered using ropivacaine 0.2%. However, there were differences in the volumes injected for each regional anesthesia technique. Proximal ACB: 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. iPACK: 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. Large ACB distal: 35 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%
Group B
This arm involves a combination of two regional anesthesia techniques: proximal adductor canal block (ACB) and iPACK. In proximal ACB, the transducer is placed in the middle of the thigh, and the injection is performed in-plane approximately 1-2 cm distal from a specific point. Meanwhile, in iPACK, the curvilinear transducer is positioned on the posteromedial aspect of the distal thigh, and the injection is performed between the popliteal artery and the femur
Regional Anesthesia
The interventions are three different regional anesthesia techniques: Proximal Adductor Canal Block (ACB), iPACK (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee), and Large-Volume Distal Adductor Canal Block (Large ACB distal). all three interventions were administered using ropivacaine 0.2%. However, there were differences in the volumes injected for each regional anesthesia technique. Proximal ACB: 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. iPACK: 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. Large ACB distal: 35 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Regional Anesthesia
The interventions are three different regional anesthesia techniques: Proximal Adductor Canal Block (ACB), iPACK (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee), and Large-Volume Distal Adductor Canal Block (Large ACB distal). all three interventions were administered using ropivacaine 0.2%. However, there were differences in the volumes injected for each regional anesthesia technique. Proximal ACB: 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. iPACK: 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. Large ACB distal: 35 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Intraoperative fracture
* Change to general anesthesia
* Patient who decides to withdraw from the study.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indonesia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pryambodho Pryambodho
dr
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
585/UN2.F1/ETIK/PPM.00.02/2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.