The Effect of Combined IPACK Block with ACB Versus ACB Alone on Pain Management and Early Mobility After Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT06888349

Last Updated: 2025-03-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-23

Study Completion Date

2024-02-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This trial was established to assess efficiency of IPACK block in combination with ACB in relieving postoperative pain , particularly posterior knee pain and providing early rehabilitation after TKA in comparison with ACB alone .

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries

NCT06802419

Continuous Adductor Canal Block Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries
RECRUITING NA

A Comparative Study of Combined Adductor Canal and Interspace Between Popliteal Artery and Knee Capsule Versus Combined Adductor Canal and Genicular Nerve in Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT06864663

Nerve Block Regional Anaesthesia
NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Adductor Canal Block and IPACK Block vs Adductor Canal Block and the Gastrosoleus Interfascial Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT07336901

Pain After Knee Arthroplasty
NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Coupling of IPACK Block With Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Alone on Pain, Functional Recovery and Inflammatory Response After Knee Replacement

NCT07096375

Adductor Canal Block Total Knee Replacement Surgery Functional Recovery
NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Comparative Study Between Ultrasound-Guided IPACK Block (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Posterior Capsule of the Knee) with Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Alone for Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT06783712

The Time Interval Between Injection of the Block and the First Rescue Analgesia Dose Given. Postoperative Pain Assessment Using NRS Score for Pain
RECRUITING PHASE1

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This trial was established to assess efficiency of IPACK block in combination with ACB in relieving postoperative pain , particularly posterior knee pain and providing early rehabilitation after TKA in comparison with ACB alone .All patients were subjected to full history taking including current medications and thorough physical examination.

Age, sex, BMI and ASA physical status were recorded and Preoperative investigations were done to all patients including laboratory investigations as (complete blood picture, bleeding time, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time) and other investigations according to the patient's medical condition. The patients were fasting for 2 to 8 hours preoperatively. All patients were consented with a written consent for the spinal anesthesia and either of the peripheral regional blocks that were held after explaining the procedure. Intraoperatively, All patients were monitored by pulse oximeter, non-invasive blood pressure cuff and electrocardiogram for heart rate and rhythm. IV Access was applied. All patients received 0.03 mg/kg midazolam iv, granisetron 1mg iv and dexamethasone 10 mg iv as a prophylaxis against nausea and vomiting.Sign IN and Time OUT checklist were revised before starting the anesthetic procedure and the surgical procedure, respectively.All patients received spinal anesthesia using 15 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in the sitting position at L3-4 or L4-5 intervertebral space.All patients received Intraoperative fluids and sedation with intravenous dexmedetomidine if needed.Checking on the availability of intralipid (lipid emulsion 20%) nearby and preparation of the ultrasound device (investigators used in the recent study the Sonosite M-Turbo C Portable Ultrasound). After patients' stabilization, Patients were divided into 2 group.

Group A: received ultrasound guided adductor canal block (ACB) alone using 22 Gag spinal needle with injection of 15ml 0.25% bupivacaine with addition of 2mg dexamethasone and 2.5mcg /ml epinephrine as an adjuvant to prolong its action.

Group B: received ultrasound guided adductor canal block (ACB) as group A, in addition to ultrasound guided infiltration of the interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee (IPACK) block with either of the two previously mentioned approaches, using 22Gag spinal needle injecting 20ml 0.25%bupivacaine with addition of 2mg dexamethasone and 2.5mcg /ml epinephrine as an adjuvant to prolong its action. Postoperatively,All patients were transferred to the post anesthesia care unit (PACU).

All patients were monitored at (PACU) for oxygen saturation, heart rate and blood pressure for 2hours observational period.The two groups of patients were evaluated and compared as regard:

Degree of postoperative pain using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at the first 48 hrs. The first need for analgesic rescue (NRS score ≥ 4 \[0: no pain 10: very severe pain\]) at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hr. and the total amount of analgesic rescues was determined. Analgesic rescue was provided using 1 gram paracetamol IV and 30mg ketorolac IV, while in a few cases titration of pethidine was used after failure of the determined analgesic rescue with paracetamol and ketorolac to provide pain relief.

The recovery of spinal motor blockade and early motor ability using Bromage score and the incidence of peroneal motor weakness (dorsiflexion of the ankle and toes).

Length of hospital stays (defined as the days from the end of surgery until discharge).

The first mobilization time recorded in hours. The Timed Up and Go (TUG)test (measured in seconds).This test was performed on the 1st and 2nd postoperative days.Postoperative 1st and 2nd-day Rang of Movement (ROM) measurements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain Motor Activity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Arm1: received ultrasound guided adductor canal block (ACB) alone . Arm2:received ultrasound guided adductor canal block (ACB) as group A, in addition to ultrasound guided infiltration of the interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee (IPACK) block

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

adductor canal block (ACB) alone

received ultrasound guided adductor canal block (ACB) alone using 22 Gag spinal needle with injection of 15ml 0.25% bupivacaine with addition of 2mg dexamethasone and 2.5mcg /ml epinephrine as an adjuvant to prolong its action.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

spinal anesthesia using 15 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in the sitting position at L3-4 or L4-5 intervertebral space.

Adductor Canal Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

local anesthetic spread around the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal ultrasound guided using 22 Gag spinal needle with injection of 15ml 0.25% bupivacaine with addition of 2mg dexamethasone and 2.5mcg /ml epinephrine as an adjuvant to prolong its action.

adductor canal block (ACB)in addition to (IPACK) block

received ultrasound guided adductor canal block (ACB) as group A, in addition to ultrasound guided infiltration of the interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee (IPACK) block with either of the two previously mentioned approaches, using 22Gag spinal needle injecting 20ml 0.25%bupivacaine with addition of 2mg dexamethasone and 2.5mcg /ml epinephrine as an adjuvant to prolong its action.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

spinal anesthesia using 15 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in the sitting position at L3-4 or L4-5 intervertebral space.

Adductor Canal Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

local anesthetic spread around the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal ultrasound guided using 22 Gag spinal needle with injection of 15ml 0.25% bupivacaine with addition of 2mg dexamethasone and 2.5mcg /ml epinephrine as an adjuvant to prolong its action.

interspace between Popliteal artery and capsule of knee (IPACK) block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ultrasound guided Local anesthetic infiltration over the posterior aspect of the femur underneath the popliteal artery targeting the genicular nerves which are the articular branches of tibial and common peroneal nerves, posterior branches of the obturator nerve, and medial genicular nerve using 22Gag spinal needle injecting 20ml 0.25%bupivacaine with addition of 2mg dexamethasone and 2.5mcg /ml epinephrine as an adjuvant to prolong its action.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

spinal anesthesia

spinal anesthesia using 15 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in the sitting position at L3-4 or L4-5 intervertebral space.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Adductor Canal Block

local anesthetic spread around the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal ultrasound guided using 22 Gag spinal needle with injection of 15ml 0.25% bupivacaine with addition of 2mg dexamethasone and 2.5mcg /ml epinephrine as an adjuvant to prolong its action.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

interspace between Popliteal artery and capsule of knee (IPACK) block

ultrasound guided Local anesthetic infiltration over the posterior aspect of the femur underneath the popliteal artery targeting the genicular nerves which are the articular branches of tibial and common peroneal nerves, posterior branches of the obturator nerve, and medial genicular nerve using 22Gag spinal needle injecting 20ml 0.25%bupivacaine with addition of 2mg dexamethasone and 2.5mcg /ml epinephrine as an adjuvant to prolong its action.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Sex: Patients of either sex
* Age: between 45 and 75 years.
* Physical status: ASA I- III.
* Weight: BMI between 28-40 kg/m2.
* Lesion: any patient with knee pathology requiring total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Exclusion Criteria

* o Body mass index \>40 kg/m2.

* ASA\>III.
* Patient's refusal.
* Revision knee arthroplasty
* Bilateral knee arthroplasty.
* Lack of mental ability to provide informed consent.
* Neuropathic pain or sensory disorders of the surgical limb.
* Contraindication to regional anesthesia (intolerance to the study drugs, bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, malignancy or infection at the site of block).
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Esraa Alaa El Deen Mahmoud Abass

Esraa Alaa(Assistant lecturer at anesthesia,ICU and pain department of faculty of medicine/ Ain shams university

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ain shams university

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMASU MD 19/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IPACK Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03692858 UNKNOWN PHASE2