Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries
NCT ID: NCT06802419
Last Updated: 2025-01-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-30
2025-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Combined IPACK Block with ACB Versus ACB Alone on Pain Management and Early Mobility After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06888349
Adductor Canal Block and IPACK Block vs Adductor Canal Block and the Gastrosoleus Interfascial Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07336901
A Comparative Study of Combined Adductor Canal and Interspace Between Popliteal Artery and Knee Capsule Versus Combined Adductor Canal and Genicular Nerve in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06864663
Adductor Canal Block With IPACK Versus Genicular Nerves Block With IPACK for Post-operative Analgesia
NCT07258277
Comparative Study Between Ultrasound-Guided IPACK Block (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Posterior Capsule of the Knee) with Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Alone for Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06783712
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An ideal nerve block that targets the sensory nerves and spares the motor function can facilitate early ambulation and rehabilitation, a major goal for patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery.
A novel technique for posterior knee block, known as the infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block combined with continuous adductor canal block (CACB) would reduce opioid requirements.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Patients will receive continuous adductor canal block.
Continuous adductor canal block
Patients will receive continuous adductor canal block.
Group 2
Patients will receive Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee
Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule
Patients will receive Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuous adductor canal block
Patients will receive continuous adductor canal block.
Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule
Patients will receive Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both sexes.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class I to II.
* Patients with successful spinal anesthesia.
* Patients scheduled for elective arthroscopic knee surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) repair.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of allergy to the medications used in the study.
* Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including coagulopathy and local infection).
* Polytrauma patients having lower limb fractures.
* Patients with pre-existing myopathy or neuropathy on the operating limb.
* Patients with diabetes mellitus.
* Psychiatric disorder.
* Morbid obesity \[body mass index (BMI) \> 45kg/m2\].
* Complicated Surgery.
21 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nada Ezzat
Assistant Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ain Shams University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FMASU MD134/2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.