Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Lumber Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT05050487
Last Updated: 2022-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-06-30
2023-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PENG and LFCN Block Versus Lumbar Plexus Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05652075
Analgesic Effectiveness of PENG Block in Programmed Hip Arthroplasty Surgery
NCT04650100
PENG vs. QLB vs. Lumbar ESPB in Total Hip Surgery
NCT05600244
PENG Block vs ESPB in Elderly Undergoing Hip Surgeries
NCT06993376
Ultrasound-Guided PENG Block vs Femoral Nerve Block for Analgesia Before Spinal Anesthesia in Hip Fracture Surgery
NCT06989047
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, the PENG block has been used to control and reduce pain in hip-related procedures.
There are reports of PENG blocks used as surgical anesthetic techniques for hip arthroplasty (in combination with local anesthetic and intravenous analgesics) or hip arthroscopy (in combination with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve \[LFCN\] block). There is a report of a PENG block used as analgesic technique for sickle cell disease vaso-occlusive crisis and a PENG radiofrequency ablation for osteoarthritis analgesia. There are also reports about the use of a PENG block for non-hip related interventions, such as leg vein ligation and stripping, medial thigh surgery, prevention of adductor muscle spasm during transurethral resection of bladder and below-knee amputation in association with popliteal sciatic nerve block.These latter cases further extended the application of the PENG block beyond the hip-related area.
So far, most of the reports describe preoperative or postoperative single-shot blocks, while there are only few case reports of continuous PENG blocks.
Due to the novelty of this technique, there are still ongoing debates about the best injection point as well as the best anesthetic concentration and the total volume to be injected.
Defined in the last decade, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is one of the more frequently used interfacial plans, and it has been the most discussed block among the recently defined techniques. Lumbar ESPB administered at lumbar levels is relatively novel and is a new horizon for regional anesthesia and pain practice.(14)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
treatment
patient will recieve pericapsular nerve group block
PENG block
The PENG block is performed under US guid¬ance, . The pa¬tient is placed in the supine position a curvilinear low-fre¬quency ultrasound probe (2-5 MHz) is initially placed in a transverse plane over the AIIS and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe approximately 30-45 degrees . .
The needle, usually a 22-G80-mm echogenic device, is inserted from lateral to medial with an in-plane approach to place the tip in the plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pu¬bic ramus posteriorly .
After needle insertion and following negative aspiration, the local anesthetic is injected . The volume used of 20 ml of(L-bupivacaine; concentration 0,25% ) . This fascial plane appeared to continue in the hip pericapsular plane.
treatement
patient will receive lumbar erector spinae plane block
lumbar erector spinae plane block
The lumbar erector spinae block is performed under US guid¬ance, after adequate skin disinfection The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position according to the selected site of surgical intervention.
The 4th lumbar vertebral level will determined The convex USG transducer was placed at the mid-vertebral line in the sagittal plane. The transducer was shifted from the midline, 3.5-4 cm laterally to the side of the surgery to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse process . 0.5-1 ml of the prepared LA solution (20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%). All LA was administered to this location between the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PENG block
The PENG block is performed under US guid¬ance, . The pa¬tient is placed in the supine position a curvilinear low-fre¬quency ultrasound probe (2-5 MHz) is initially placed in a transverse plane over the AIIS and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe approximately 30-45 degrees . .
The needle, usually a 22-G80-mm echogenic device, is inserted from lateral to medial with an in-plane approach to place the tip in the plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pu¬bic ramus posteriorly .
After needle insertion and following negative aspiration, the local anesthetic is injected . The volume used of 20 ml of(L-bupivacaine; concentration 0,25% ) . This fascial plane appeared to continue in the hip pericapsular plane.
lumbar erector spinae plane block
The lumbar erector spinae block is performed under US guid¬ance, after adequate skin disinfection The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position according to the selected site of surgical intervention.
The 4th lumbar vertebral level will determined The convex USG transducer was placed at the mid-vertebral line in the sagittal plane. The transducer was shifted from the midline, 3.5-4 cm laterally to the side of the surgery to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse process . 0.5-1 ml of the prepared LA solution (20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%). All LA was administered to this location between the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Adult patients (Age \>18 yrs)
3. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, were admitted for hip arthroplasty (THA or HA) for femoral neck fracture, and had undergone a preoperative RA technique (PENG block or lumbar erector spinae plane block)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with multiple trauma
3. Patients who could not assess pain reliably (dementia)
4. Patients who in anticoagulation
5. Patient refused
6. Infection at the side of injection
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdeltwab Younis Tamam
assisstant lecturer of anesthesia and intensive care
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
T1991
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.