Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Lumber Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management After Total Hip Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT05050487

Last Updated: 2022-04-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-30

Study Completion Date

2023-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pain is a major problem that has to be dealt with in case of hip fracture, as it presents an obstacle for examination, positioning for receiving neuroaxial anesthesia and postoperative mobility and physiotherapy. With the introduction of ultrasound in regional anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks, regional analgesia float to the surface as a substitute for opioids with less side effects Lumbar erector spinae plane block has emerged as a reliable analgesic option for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). In 2018, a new block was described, termed pericapsular nerve group block or PENG block, that selectively targets the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves while sparing their motor components

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pain is a major problem that has to be dealt with in case of hip fracture, as it presents an obstacle for examination, positioning for receiving neuroaxial anesthesia and postoperative mobility and physiotherapy. With the introduction of ultrasound in regional anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks, regional analgesia float to the surface as a substitute for opioids with less side effects Lumbar erector spinae plane block has emerged as a reliable analgesic option for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). In 2018, a new block was described, termed pericapsular nerve group block or PENG block, that selectively targets the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves while sparing their motor components The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is an ultrasound-guided approach first de-scribed by Giron-Arango et al. for the blockade of the articular branches of the femoral (FN), obturator (ON) and accessory obturator (AON) nerve that provide sensory innervation to the an¬terior hip capsule. It has been developed as an alternative regional anesthesia technique for the management of acute pain after hip fractures, but its applications are expanding.

Currently, the PENG block has been used to control and reduce pain in hip-related procedures.

There are reports of PENG blocks used as surgical anesthetic techniques for hip arthroplasty (in combination with local anesthetic and intravenous analgesics) or hip arthroscopy (in combination with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve \[LFCN\] block). There is a report of a PENG block used as analgesic technique for sickle cell disease vaso-occlusive crisis and a PENG radiofrequency ablation for osteoarthritis analgesia. There are also reports about the use of a PENG block for non-hip related interventions, such as leg vein ligation and stripping, medial thigh surgery, prevention of adductor muscle spasm during transurethral resection of bladder and below-knee amputation in association with popliteal sciatic nerve block.These latter cases further extended the application of the PENG block beyond the hip-related area.

So far, most of the reports describe preoperative or postoperative single-shot blocks, while there are only few case reports of continuous PENG blocks.

Due to the novelty of this technique, there are still ongoing debates about the best injection point as well as the best anesthetic concentration and the total volume to be injected.

Defined in the last decade, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is one of the more frequently used interfacial plans, and it has been the most discussed block among the recently defined techniques. Lumbar ESPB administered at lumbar levels is relatively novel and is a new horizon for regional anesthesia and pain practice.(14)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Operative Pain, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized controlled trail
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

treatment

patient will recieve pericapsular nerve group block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PENG block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The PENG block is performed under US guid¬ance, . The pa¬tient is placed in the supine position a curvilinear low-fre¬quency ultrasound probe (2-5 MHz) is initially placed in a transverse plane over the AIIS and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe approximately 30-45 degrees . .

The needle, usually a 22-G80-mm echogenic device, is inserted from lateral to medial with an in-plane approach to place the tip in the plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pu¬bic ramus posteriorly .

After needle insertion and following negative aspiration, the local anesthetic is injected . The volume used of 20 ml of(L-bupivacaine; concentration 0,25% ) . This fascial plane appeared to continue in the hip pericapsular plane.

treatement

patient will receive lumbar erector spinae plane block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lumbar erector spinae plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The lumbar erector spinae block is performed under US guid¬ance, after adequate skin disinfection The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position according to the selected site of surgical intervention.

The 4th lumbar vertebral level will determined The convex USG transducer was placed at the mid-vertebral line in the sagittal plane. The transducer was shifted from the midline, 3.5-4 cm laterally to the side of the surgery to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse process . 0.5-1 ml of the prepared LA solution (20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%). All LA was administered to this location between the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PENG block

The PENG block is performed under US guid¬ance, . The pa¬tient is placed in the supine position a curvilinear low-fre¬quency ultrasound probe (2-5 MHz) is initially placed in a transverse plane over the AIIS and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe approximately 30-45 degrees . .

The needle, usually a 22-G80-mm echogenic device, is inserted from lateral to medial with an in-plane approach to place the tip in the plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pu¬bic ramus posteriorly .

After needle insertion and following negative aspiration, the local anesthetic is injected . The volume used of 20 ml of(L-bupivacaine; concentration 0,25% ) . This fascial plane appeared to continue in the hip pericapsular plane.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

lumbar erector spinae plane block

The lumbar erector spinae block is performed under US guid¬ance, after adequate skin disinfection The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position according to the selected site of surgical intervention.

The 4th lumbar vertebral level will determined The convex USG transducer was placed at the mid-vertebral line in the sagittal plane. The transducer was shifted from the midline, 3.5-4 cm laterally to the side of the surgery to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse process . 0.5-1 ml of the prepared LA solution (20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%). All LA was administered to this location between the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

pericapsular nerve group block ESPB

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ASA grade 1\&2 \&3
2. Adult patients (Age \>18 yrs)
3. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, were admitted for hip arthroplasty (THA or HA) for femoral neck fracture, and had undergone a preoperative RA technique (PENG block or lumbar erector spinae plane block)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with chronic pain before surgery (taking opioids)
2. Patients with multiple trauma
3. Patients who could not assess pain reliably (dementia)
4. Patients who in anticoagulation
5. Patient refused
6. Infection at the side of injection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abdeltwab Younis Tamam

assisstant lecturer of anesthesia and intensive care

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Abdeltwab Younis

Role: CONTACT

01098518513

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

T1991

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.