PENG Block and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block For Hip Replacement Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06040879
Last Updated: 2023-09-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-01
2022-09-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: patients who had hip surgery at E University hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam from August 2021 to August 2022 belonged to two groups: group of patients with pain relief with PENG block in combination with LFCN block (PENG BLOCK group) and group of patients with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA group). Outcomes regarding clinical and pain score from initiation of insertion or PCA insertion (H0) to after 72 hours (H72) were recorded.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PENG and LFCN Block Versus Lumbar Plexus Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05652075
PENG Block Plus Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block for Posterolateral-approached Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05432011
Comparison of the Efficacy of PENG Block in Combination With LFCN Block and Wound Infiltration
NCT04681222
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block vs Supra Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block
NCT06321718
PENG Block vs PENG Plus Periarticular Injection vs Periarticular Injection in Older Adults
NCT07327892
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
During and after the surgery, a group of patients received intravenous morphine analgesia via PCA (concentration 1mg/ml, bolus dose of 1mg, lock time 10 minutes, maximum dose 10mg/4 hours). The remaining group of patients receive pain relief by PENG block and LFCN block. In this group, the ultrasound probe was placed horizontally from the anterior superior iliac spine, and was moved along the femoral arc defining the pubic spine. Then, the transducer was rotated 45 degrees, moved parallel to the femoral arch identifying the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), iliopubic eminence (IPE) and inferior lumbosacral head. The ultrasound probe was moved lightly until the upper end of the femoral head was identified. Next, a 120 mm Tuohy 18G anesthetic needle was used under ultrasound guidance, which was moved lateral to medial in the plane between the ultrasound transducer and the superior tip of the femoral head. Then, 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.25% was injected through the anesthetic needle tip.
Data were collected at different times including: before surgery, before anesthesia, during surgery and after surgery. The information was recorded in the medical record.
Preoperative data: the collected information included the general characteristics of the study patients including age, gender, weight, height, history of smoking/motion sickness, diagnosis, health classification according to ASA, liver and kidney function tests. With pre-anesthesia data, information was collected including pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, SpO2.
Intraoperative data: the information collected includes information about anesthesia and surgical procedure.
Post-operative data: the collected information includes blood test results (urea, creatinine, liver enzymes), pain score (Visual analogue scale - VAS - scale from 0 to 10, the higher the score, the higher the pain level. more), analgesic drugs consumption status, respiratory and circulatory changes, adverse events, and analgesic satisfaction. Time was recorded from initiation of catheterization or PCA insertion (H0) to after 72 hours (H72).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PENG BLOCK
receiving pain relief through PENG and LFCN block
PERICAPSULAR NERVE GROUP BLOCK COMBINED WITH LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE BLOCK
During and after the surgery, a group of patients received intravenous morphine analgesia via PCA (concentration 1mg/ml, bolus dose of 1mg, lock time 10 minutes, maximum dose 10mg/4 hours). The remaining group of patients receive pain relief by PENG block and LFCN block. In this group, the ultrasound probe was placed horizontally from the anterior superior iliac spine, and was moved along the femoral arc defining the pubic spine. Then, the transducer was rotated 45 degrees, moved parallel to the femoral arch identifying the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), iliopubic eminence (IPE) and inferior lumbosacral head. The ultrasound probe was moved lightly until the upper end of the femoral head was identified. Next, a 120 mm Tuohy 18G anesthetic needle was used under ultrasound guidance, which was moved lateral to medial in the plane between the ultrasound transducer and the superior tip of the femoral head. Then, 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.25% was injected through the anesthetic needle tip
PCA
receiving morphine PCA analgesia
PERICAPSULAR NERVE GROUP BLOCK COMBINED WITH LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE BLOCK
During and after the surgery, a group of patients received intravenous morphine analgesia via PCA (concentration 1mg/ml, bolus dose of 1mg, lock time 10 minutes, maximum dose 10mg/4 hours). The remaining group of patients receive pain relief by PENG block and LFCN block. In this group, the ultrasound probe was placed horizontally from the anterior superior iliac spine, and was moved along the femoral arc defining the pubic spine. Then, the transducer was rotated 45 degrees, moved parallel to the femoral arch identifying the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), iliopubic eminence (IPE) and inferior lumbosacral head. The ultrasound probe was moved lightly until the upper end of the femoral head was identified. Next, a 120 mm Tuohy 18G anesthetic needle was used under ultrasound guidance, which was moved lateral to medial in the plane between the ultrasound transducer and the superior tip of the femoral head. Then, 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.25% was injected through the anesthetic needle tip
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PERICAPSULAR NERVE GROUP BLOCK COMBINED WITH LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE BLOCK
During and after the surgery, a group of patients received intravenous morphine analgesia via PCA (concentration 1mg/ml, bolus dose of 1mg, lock time 10 minutes, maximum dose 10mg/4 hours). The remaining group of patients receive pain relief by PENG block and LFCN block. In this group, the ultrasound probe was placed horizontally from the anterior superior iliac spine, and was moved along the femoral arc defining the pubic spine. Then, the transducer was rotated 45 degrees, moved parallel to the femoral arch identifying the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), iliopubic eminence (IPE) and inferior lumbosacral head. The ultrasound probe was moved lightly until the upper end of the femoral head was identified. Next, a 120 mm Tuohy 18G anesthetic needle was used under ultrasound guidance, which was moved lateral to medial in the plane between the ultrasound transducer and the superior tip of the femoral head. Then, 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.25% was injected through the anesthetic needle tip
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients had hip replacement surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
* coagulation disorders
* organs dysfunction
* allergy to anesthetics
* did not cooperate with physicians
* history of opioid dependence
* inability to participate in the study
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hanoi Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tu Nguyen, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hanoi Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hanoi Medical University
Hanoi, , Vietnam
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ferguson RJ, Palmer AJ, Taylor A, Porter ML, Malchau H, Glyn-Jones S. Hip replacement. Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1662-1671. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31777-X.
Ferrata P, Carta S, Fortina M, Scipio D, Riva A, Di Giacinto S. Painful hip arthroplasty: definition. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2011 May;8(2):19-22.
YaDeau JT, Tedore T, Goytizolo EA, Kim DH, Green DS, Westrick A, Fan R, Rade MC, Ranawat AS, Coleman SH, Kelly BT. Lumbar plexus blockade reduces pain after hip arthroscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2012 Oct;115(4):968-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318265bacd. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
Duarte LT, Beraldo PS, Saraiva RA. [Effects of epidural analgesia and continuous lumbar plexus block on functional rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Sep-Oct;59(5):531-44. doi: 10.1016/s0034-7094(09)70078-9. Portuguese.
Singelyn FJ, Ferrant T, Malisse MF, Joris D. Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, continuous epidural analgesia, and continuous femoral nerve sheath block on rehabilitation after unilateral total-hip arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;30(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.05.008.
Lin DY, Morrison C, Brown B, Saies AA, Pawar R, Vermeulen M, Anderson SR, Lee TS, Doornberg J, Kroon HM, Jaarsma RL. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides improved short-term analgesia compared with the femoral nerve block in hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized comparative trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 May;46(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102315. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
Shafiq F, Hamid M, Samad K. Complications and interventions associated with epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief in a tertiary care hospital. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Oct;20(6):827-32.
Rasouli MR, Viscusi ER. Adductor Canal Block for Knee Surgeries: An Emerging Analgesic Technique. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017 May;5(3):131-132. No abstract available.
Kamel I, Ahmed MF, Sethi A. Regional anesthesia for orthopedic procedures: What orthopedic surgeons need to know. World J Orthop. 2022 Jan 18;13(1):11-35. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.11. eCollection 2022 Jan 18.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HMU09.2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.