Effectiveness of PENG Block Combined to LFCN Block on the Quality of Recovery After Total Hip Replacement

NCT ID: NCT04245280

Last Updated: 2024-08-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-04

Study Completion Date

2024-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the association of PENG and LFCN blocks on the quality of recovery 24 hours after total hip replacement surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Total hip replacement is a frequent procedure in the geriatric population associated with moderate post-operative pain. It is known that a sub-optimal analgesia is associated with a delayed mobilization leading to a longer hospital stay, poor functional recovery and increased thromboembolic complications. Moreover, opioid analgesia, especially in the geriatric population, increases the incidence of delirium.

Multimodal analgesia, combining different analgesic classes and regional anesthesia, is preferable than relying mainly on opioids, improving the outcomes in the post-operative period. Until now, no regional anesthesia technique has proven itself to be better than the others, each having its limitations. While the local anesthetic doses are high with the peri-articular infiltration under direct visualisation, the epidural is associated with bilateral block and sympathetic block. Also, the lumbar plexus block is a technically difficult block and is associated with a motor block. Finally, other blocks such as the femoral, 3:1 or fascia iliaca are not blocking the totality of the nerves involved in the post-operative pain pathways.

A recent anatomic study from Short et al. demonstrated a greater implication than what was previously known of the accessory obturator nerve and the femoral nerve in the etiology of the post-operative pain. Regarding the incision, it is generally located in the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve territory. Recently published as case reports, the PENG block is a new regional anesthesia technique that has emerged for hip surgeries. It consists of injecting local anesthetics in the myofascial plan between the psoas anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly.

With this prospective randomized trial, the investigators aim to investigate whether a PENG block combined with the LFCN block provides a superior analgesia compared to multimodal analgesia alone and improves the outcomes of the patients in the post-operative phase.

Methods:

The PENG and LFCN blocks will be performed with the patients in a dorsal decubitus position, using a high frequency linear ultrasound probe (Sonosite HFL50 6-15 MHz) in the inguinal area, with an insulated hyperechoic needle (50-80 mm, 22 gauge, Pajunk) placed in plane in relation to the ultrasound beam. The myofascial plane between the psoas anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly will be targeted. The anesthesiologist will confirm the correct position of the needle by injecting 1 ml of 5% dextrose.

For the group A, after negative aspiration, 20 ml of a solution of ropivacaine 0,5% with epinephrine 2,5 mcg/ml will be injected in 5 ml aliquots. Then, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve will be localized, infero-medially to the antero-superior iliac spine, superficially to the sartorius muscle and 5 ml of the same solution will be injected with the same needle. For group B, the technique of the blocks will be identical to group A, but 20 ml and 5 ml of a sterile saline solution will be used instead.

Patients will then be taken to the operating room where a spinal anesthesia will be performed using 12 mg of iso or hyperbaric bupivacaine (at the discretion of the anesthesiologist) with the addition of 15 mcg of fentanyl. A dose of 8 mg of dexamethasone will be administered intravenously over 10 minutes. In case of failed spinal anesthesia, patient will be excluded from the study.

For hospitalized patients:

In the absence of contraindication, patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with hydromorphone will be prescribed post-operatively, until 8h on post-operative day 1. Patients will thus have the possibility to self-administer 0,2 mg of hydromorphone every 5 minutes, for a maximum of 10 doses per hour. In case of contraindications, subcutaneous or per os hydromorphone will be prescribed to these patients. Multimodal analgesia with acetaminophen and celecoxib (in absence of contraindication) will be continued as per protocol.

For patients treated on an outpatient trajectory:

Patients will benefit from medical prescriptions for total hip replacement, including hydromorphone or oxycodone, celecoxib and acetaminophen.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Hip Replacement Surgery Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, randomized controlled, triple blind
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
triple blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PENG and LFCN blocks with ropivacaine

For the PENG block, and after negative aspiration, 20 ml of a solution of ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 2.5 mcg/ml will be injected in 5 ml aliquots. Then, for the LFCN block, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve will be localized, infero-medially to the antero-superior iliac spine, superficially to the sartorius muscle and 5 ml of the same solution will be injected with the same needle.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine 0.5% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 2.5 mcg/ml

PENG and LFCN blocks with saline solution

For the PENG block, and after negative aspiration, 20 ml of a saline solution will be injected in 5 ml aliquots. Then, for the LFCN block, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve will be localized, infero-medially to the antero-superior iliac spine, superficially to the sartorius muscle and 5 ml of the same saline solution will be injected with the same needle.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

normal saline solution (NaCl 0.9%)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine 0.5% Injectable Solution

ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 2.5 mcg/ml

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline Solution

normal saline solution (NaCl 0.9%)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ropivacaine 0.5% Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over 18 years old undergoing a total hip replacement surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication to regional anesthesia (allergy to local anesthetics, severe coagulopathy, infection in the designated area, pre-existing neuropathy in the obturator or femoral territory)
* Contraindication to spinal anesthesia
* Patient's refusal or inability to consent
* Opioid use on a regular basis pre-operatively
* Inability to communicate with medical team or research team
* Inability to understand the items of the multiple forms
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sébastien Garneau, MD, FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19.275

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.