PENG vs L-ESPB With S-ESPB for Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT07180979

Last Updated: 2025-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-01

Study Completion Date

2026-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether different types of regional anesthesia can improve pain control and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty in adult patients undergoing elective hip replacement surgery.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the PENG block reduce opioid use in the first 48 hours after surgery more effectively than the combined L-ESPB + S-ESPB technique? Which method provides better pain relief, preserves muscle strength, and supports earlier mobilization? Researchers will compare the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block with the combination of Lumbar and Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (L-ESPB + S-ESPB) to see which provides better pain control, fewer side effects, and faster recovery.

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to receive one of the two types of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia Undergo standard hip replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia Be monitored for pain scores, opioid use, time to first walking, muscle strength, satisfaction, and side effects over the first 48 hours after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain, which can impair early mobilization and functional recovery. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and the erector spinae plane (ESP) block, have been introduced as motor-sparing alternatives to femoral and lumbar plexus blocks. The PENG block targets articular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves, offering effective analgesia with minimal motor blockade. Meanwhile, the lumbar ESPB (L-ESPB) and sacral ESPB (S-ESPB) may provide a broader, yet still motor-sparing, analgesic field by targeting both lumbar and sacral nerve roots involved in hip innervation.

To date, no randomized trial has compared PENG with a dual-level ESP block approach (L-ESPB + S-ESPB) in THA patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Osteoarthritis Hip Arthropathy Hip Pain Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

Participants in this group will undergo simulated (sham) regional anesthesia procedures at the anatomical sites corresponding to both intervention techniques (pericapsular + lateral femoral cutaneous nerve \[LFCN\] block locations, and lumbar/sacral erector spinae plane block locations). Under ultrasound guidance, a needle will be introduced to each site, but only 1-2 mL of normal saline will be injected to mimic the sensation of an active block without delivering local anesthetic. All participants will receive standard spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty and multimodal postoperative analgesia according to institutional protocol.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

0.9% Sodium chloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Sham ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block, lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB), and sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB).

At each anatomical site, under ultrasound guidance, a block needle will be inserted to the correct position, and 1-2 mL of preservative-free normal saline (0.9% NaCl) will be injected to mimic the sensation of an active block. No local anesthetic will be administered. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.

PENG + LFCN

Participants in this group will receive an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block combined with a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block using local anesthetic. To preserve blinding, sham procedures will be performed at the lumbar and sacral erector spinae plane block sites (needle insertion and injection of 1-2 mL normal saline). Standard spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty and multimodal postoperative analgesia will be administered as per institutional protocol.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block, with sham lumbar and sacral ESPBs.

PENG block: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. LFCN block: 5 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. Sham lumbar ESPB: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at lumbar ESPB site. Sham sacral ESPB: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at sacral ESPB site. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.

L-ESPB + S-ESPB

Participants in this group will receive ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) combined with sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB) using local anesthetic. To preserve blinding, sham procedures will be performed at the pericapsular and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block sites (needle insertion and injection of 1-2 mL normal saline). Standard spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty and multimodal postoperative analgesia will be provided according to institutional protocol.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) and sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB), with sham PENG and LFCN blocks.

Lumbar ESPB: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at L3 transverse process level. Sacral ESPB: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at sacral intermediate crest. Sham PENG block: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at PENG site. Sham LFCN block: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at LFCN site. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.9% Sodium chloride

Sham ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block, lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB), and sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB).

At each anatomical site, under ultrasound guidance, a block needle will be inserted to the correct position, and 1-2 mL of preservative-free normal saline (0.9% NaCl) will be injected to mimic the sensation of an active block. No local anesthetic will be administered. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution

Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block, with sham lumbar and sacral ESPBs.

PENG block: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. LFCN block: 5 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. Sham lumbar ESPB: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at lumbar ESPB site. Sham sacral ESPB: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at sacral ESPB site. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution

Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) and sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB), with sham PENG and LFCN blocks.

Lumbar ESPB: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at L3 transverse process level. Sacral ESPB: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at sacral intermediate crest. Sham PENG block: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at PENG site. Sham LFCN block: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at LFCN site. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sham block

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 65 years
* ASA physical status I-III
* Elective unilateral THA via posterior or lateral approach
* Informed consent provided

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy to study drugs (ropivacaine, dexamethasone)
* Chronic opioid use (\>30 MME/day)
* Coagulopathy or infection at the injection site
* BMI \> 40 kg/m²
* Pre-existing motor weakness or neuropathy in the affected limb
* Cognitive impairment precluding informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Malgorzata Reysner

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Tomasz Reysenr, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Poznan Univesity of Medical Sciences

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Malgorzata Reysner, M.D. Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

+48 61 873 83 03

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

03/2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.