PENG vs L-ESPB With S-ESPB for Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT07180979
Last Updated: 2025-09-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE4
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-01
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the PENG block reduce opioid use in the first 48 hours after surgery more effectively than the combined L-ESPB + S-ESPB technique? Which method provides better pain relief, preserves muscle strength, and supports earlier mobilization? Researchers will compare the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block with the combination of Lumbar and Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (L-ESPB + S-ESPB) to see which provides better pain control, fewer side effects, and faster recovery.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to receive one of the two types of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia Undergo standard hip replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia Be monitored for pain scores, opioid use, time to first walking, muscle strength, satisfaction, and side effects over the first 48 hours after surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erector Spinae vs. PENG Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06083428
PENG Block vs Suprainguinal FICB vs Lumbar ESPB for Analgesia After Hip Surgery
NCT07288983
PENG Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05944380
Erector Spinae Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Replacement
NCT05796804
PENG Block vs Intrathecal Morphine in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05308420
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To date, no randomized trial has compared PENG with a dual-level ESP block approach (L-ESPB + S-ESPB) in THA patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Participants in this group will undergo simulated (sham) regional anesthesia procedures at the anatomical sites corresponding to both intervention techniques (pericapsular + lateral femoral cutaneous nerve \[LFCN\] block locations, and lumbar/sacral erector spinae plane block locations). Under ultrasound guidance, a needle will be introduced to each site, but only 1-2 mL of normal saline will be injected to mimic the sensation of an active block without delivering local anesthetic. All participants will receive standard spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty and multimodal postoperative analgesia according to institutional protocol.
0.9% Sodium chloride
Sham ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block, lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB), and sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB).
At each anatomical site, under ultrasound guidance, a block needle will be inserted to the correct position, and 1-2 mL of preservative-free normal saline (0.9% NaCl) will be injected to mimic the sensation of an active block. No local anesthetic will be administered. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.
PENG + LFCN
Participants in this group will receive an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block combined with a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block using local anesthetic. To preserve blinding, sham procedures will be performed at the lumbar and sacral erector spinae plane block sites (needle insertion and injection of 1-2 mL normal saline). Standard spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty and multimodal postoperative analgesia will be administered as per institutional protocol.
Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution
Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block, with sham lumbar and sacral ESPBs.
PENG block: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. LFCN block: 5 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. Sham lumbar ESPB: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at lumbar ESPB site. Sham sacral ESPB: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at sacral ESPB site. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.
L-ESPB + S-ESPB
Participants in this group will receive ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) combined with sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB) using local anesthetic. To preserve blinding, sham procedures will be performed at the pericapsular and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block sites (needle insertion and injection of 1-2 mL normal saline). Standard spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty and multimodal postoperative analgesia will be provided according to institutional protocol.
Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution
Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) and sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB), with sham PENG and LFCN blocks.
Lumbar ESPB: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at L3 transverse process level. Sacral ESPB: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at sacral intermediate crest. Sham PENG block: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at PENG site. Sham LFCN block: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at LFCN site. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
0.9% Sodium chloride
Sham ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block, lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB), and sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB).
At each anatomical site, under ultrasound guidance, a block needle will be inserted to the correct position, and 1-2 mL of preservative-free normal saline (0.9% NaCl) will be injected to mimic the sensation of an active block. No local anesthetic will be administered. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.
Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution
Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block, with sham lumbar and sacral ESPBs.
PENG block: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. LFCN block: 5 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. Sham lumbar ESPB: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at lumbar ESPB site. Sham sacral ESPB: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at sacral ESPB site. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.
Ropivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution
Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) and sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB), with sham PENG and LFCN blocks.
Lumbar ESPB: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at L3 transverse process level. Sacral ESPB: 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine at sacral intermediate crest. Sham PENG block: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at PENG site. Sham LFCN block: 1-2 mL preservative-free normal saline at LFCN site. All patients will receive standard spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine, 10-15 mg intrathecally for total hip arthroplasty.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA physical status I-III
* Elective unilateral THA via posterior or lateral approach
* Informed consent provided
Exclusion Criteria
* Chronic opioid use (\>30 MME/day)
* Coagulopathy or infection at the injection site
* BMI \> 40 kg/m²
* Pre-existing motor weakness or neuropathy in the affected limb
* Cognitive impairment precluding informed consent
65 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Malgorzata Reysner
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Tomasz Reysenr, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Poznan Univesity of Medical Sciences
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
03/2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.