PENG Block vs Suprainguinal FICB vs Lumbar ESPB for Analgesia After Hip Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07288983

Last Updated: 2025-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

93 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial compares three motor-sparing regional anesthesia techniques used for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block, the suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (S-FICB), and the Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB). Although all three techniques are widely used in modern hip surgery, their relative analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing potential, and impact on early functional recovery have not been directly compared in a single study.

The primary objective is to determine which block provides the most effective postoperative analgesia while preserving motor function and facilitating early mobilization. Secondary objectives include comparisons of opioid consumption, pain scores at rest and during movement, time to first rescue analgesia, block-related adverse events, quadriceps strength, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and early functional outcomes.

This study aims to identify the optimal motor-sparing regional anesthesia strategy for older adults undergoing hip arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Regional anesthesia plays a key role in modern multimodal analgesia for hip arthroplasty, particularly in older adults who are vulnerable to opioid-related adverse effects and postoperative functional decline. Several motor-sparing nerve block techniques have been developed to improve postoperative pain control while maintaining quadriceps strength and enabling early mobilization. Among them, the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block, the suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (S-FICB), and the Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB) are widely used in clinical practice. However, no randomized clinical trial has directly compared these three approaches within a single study population.

The PENG block targets the articular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves, providing selective analgesia of the anterior hip capsule with minimal motor involvement. The suprainguinal FICB delivers a higher spread of local anesthetic over the femoral nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and variable portions of the obturator nerve, offering broader sensory coverage but with a higher likelihood of quadriceps weakness. The lumbar ESPB is a posterior fascial plane block that may achieve indirect spread toward the lumbar plexus, potentially providing balanced anterior and posterior capsular analgesia while preserving motor function.

This randomized, double-blinded, three-arm controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic effectiveness, opioid-sparing properties, and motor-sparing characteristics of PENG, S-FICB, and L-ESPB in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. All participants will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia. The study's primary endpoint is the time to first rescue opioid administration. Secondary outcomes include total postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores at rest and during movement, quadriceps muscle strength, block performance time, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, early mobilization parameters, and block-related adverse events.

The results of this trial are expected to clarify the relative benefits and limitations of the three most commonly used motor-sparing regional anesthesia techniques for hip surgery and to guide optimal selection of blocks for enhanced recovery pathways in older adults undergoing hip arthroplasty.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PENG block

Participants in this arm will receive a Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block performed under ultrasound guidance. The block will be administered with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine injected lateral to the iliopsoas tendon at the level of the anterior inferior iliac spine and iliopubic eminence. No additional peripheral nerve blocks will be performed. All participants will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block will be performed under ultrasound guidance using a curvilinear or linear transducer. A 22-gauge echogenic needle will be advanced in-plane toward the fascial plane between the iliopsoas tendon and the pelvic brim at the level of the anterior inferior iliac spine. A total of 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected incrementally with repeated aspiration to avoid intravascular injection. No additional peripheral nerve blocks will be performed. All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia.

Suprainguinal FICB

Participants will receive a suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (S-FICB) performed under ultrasound guidance. A total of 40 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected in the suprainguinal fascia iliaca plane to achieve spread toward the femoral nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and obturator nerve. All participants will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (S-FICB)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block will be performed under ultrasound guidance using a high-frequency linear probe placed in the sagittal oblique plane above the inguinal ligament. After identifying the fascia iliaca above the iliacus muscle, a 22-gauge echogenic needle will be advanced in-plane into the suprainguinal fascia iliaca space. A total of 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected to achieve cranial spread toward the femoral nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and obturator nerve. All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia.

Lumbar ESPB

Participants will receive a lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB) performed under ultrasound guidance at the L4 transverse process level. A total of 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. No sacral ESPB will be added. All participants will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The lumbar erector spinae plane block will be performed under ultrasound guidance at the L4 transverse process level. A curvilinear or linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the erector spinae muscle and underlying transverse process. A 22-gauge echogenic needle will be inserted in-plane and advanced to the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. A total of 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected incrementally. No sacral ESPB will be added. All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block

The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block will be performed under ultrasound guidance using a curvilinear or linear transducer. A 22-gauge echogenic needle will be advanced in-plane toward the fascial plane between the iliopsoas tendon and the pelvic brim at the level of the anterior inferior iliac spine. A total of 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected incrementally with repeated aspiration to avoid intravascular injection. No additional peripheral nerve blocks will be performed. All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (S-FICB)

The suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block will be performed under ultrasound guidance using a high-frequency linear probe placed in the sagittal oblique plane above the inguinal ligament. After identifying the fascia iliaca above the iliacus muscle, a 22-gauge echogenic needle will be advanced in-plane into the suprainguinal fascia iliaca space. A total of 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected to achieve cranial spread toward the femoral nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and obturator nerve. All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB)

The lumbar erector spinae plane block will be performed under ultrasound guidance at the L4 transverse process level. A curvilinear or linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the erector spinae muscle and underlying transverse process. A 22-gauge echogenic needle will be inserted in-plane and advanced to the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. A total of 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected incrementally. No sacral ESPB will be added. All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged 65 years or older scheduled to undergo elective hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia.
* Ability to provide written informed consent.
* Ability to understand and reliably use numerical pain assessment tools (NRS 0-10).
* ASA physical status II-III.
* Expected postoperative hospitalization of at least 48 hours to ensure complete data collection.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment, language barrier, or severe hearing/speech limitations.
* Coagulopathy or therapeutic anticoagulation not meeting safety criteria for regional anesthesia.
* Local infection at the planned block site.
* Allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to ropivacaine, local anesthetics, or study medications.
* Pre-existing lower-limb neurological deficits (motor or sensory) affecting outcome assessments.
* Severe spinal deformity or anatomical limitations preventing safe performance of regional blocks.
* Chronic opioid use (defined as \>30 mg oral morphine equivalents daily for more than 2 weeks).
* Severe renal failure (eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m²) or severe hepatic impairment.
* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (fasting glucose \>300 mg/dL or HbA1c \>10%).
* History of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST).
* Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the past 30 days.
* Any condition deemed by investigators to interfere with protocol adherence, safety monitoring, or outcome reliability.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Malgorzata Reysner, MD PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Poznań University of Medicla Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Malgorzata Reysner, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +48 61 873 83 03

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14/2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id