Effect of Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine on Early Mobilization After Hip Replacement
NCT ID: NCT06621849
Last Updated: 2025-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-23
2025-09-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* All patients will be educated about the standard Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain score of 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain) during preanesthetic evaluation visit.
* In our study, 70 patients will be randomly divided into two equal groups, with 35 pt. in each. Spinal anesthesia will be performed at L3-L4 with 3.5 ml of hyper¬baric bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.25 ml normal saline only for the E group or 0.1 mg morphine in 0.25 ml normal saline for the M group (9).
Group {E} will receive ESPB on the ipsilateral side of the surgery then 3.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.25 ml of normal saline intrathecal.
Group {M} will receive 5 ml of subcutaneous lidocaine 1% then 3.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.1 mg of morphine in 0.25 ml of normal saline intrathecal.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PENG vs. QLB vs. Lumbar ESPB in Total Hip Surgery
NCT05600244
Combined Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block in Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries
NCT05930171
Pericapsular Nerve Group and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Geriatrics Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06904703
A Comparative Study Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Combined Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group and Lateral Femoral Nerve Block Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06402006
The Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-guided Sacral Erector Spinae, Pericapsular Nerve Block and Lumber Plexus Block for Pain Relief for Hip Surgery: Randomized Controlled Study
NCT06842342
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* All patients will be educated about the standard Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain score of 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain) during preanesthetic evaluation visit.
* In our study, 70 patients will be randomly divided into two equal groups, with 35 pt. in each. Spinal anesthesia will be performed at L3-L4 with 3.5 ml of hyper¬baric bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.25 ml normal saline only for the E group or 0.1 mg morphine in 0.25 ml normal saline for the M group (9).
Group {E} will receive ESPB on the ipsilateral side of the surgery then 3.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.25 ml of normal saline intrathecal.
Group {M} will receive 5 ml of subcutaneous lidocaine 1% then 3.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.1 mg of morphine in 0.25 ml of normal saline intrathecal.
* Study procedure and anaesthetic technique
* On the arrival of patients in the operating room, an 18 gauge intravenous cannula will be inserted, and normal saline (10 ml/kg) will be infused as a preload. The patients will be connected to a monitor to record heart rate (HR), non-invasive measurement of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), main blood pressure, continuous electrocardiogram monitoring (ECG) and oxygen saturation (SpO2). Base line reading will be recorded.
* All backup measures and equipment for general anesthesia will be ready for urgent use or rescue general anesthesia could be required.
* In the ESPB group, an ultrasound-guided ESPB will be performed on the ipsilateral side of the surgery while the patient is in lateral position using a linear 6-13 MHz ultrasound probe (SONOSITE Fujif¬ilm S-Nerve, USA) vertical parallel and 3-5 cm from the midline (10). Moving cephalic from the sacrum, we will identify the L5, L4, and L3 transverse processes and erector spinae muscles posteriorly. A 21 G and 70mm length needle (SonoPlex®, Pajunk Medizintechnologie, Germany) will be directed in-plane, and the needle tip will be positioned anterior to the erector spinae muscle at the corner of the transverse process. After the initial saline injection, dissec¬tion of the plane will be observed by injecting a total vol¬ume of 20 ml composed of 10 micrograms dexmedetomidine in 2ml of normal saline and 18 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%, which is far from the toxic dose (10). Correct placement is defined as the spread of local anesthetic cranially and caudally from the injection point, dissect¬ing the plane between the transverse processes and erector spinae muscles.
* In the intrathecal morphine group, patients will be injected with 5 ml of lidocaine subcutaneously as a local anesthetic before spinal anesthesia but using the same technique of ESPB regarding position and ultrasound guidance to ensure complete blinding of the patients.
* Patients from both groups will then receive spinal anaesthesia; intrathecal 3.5 ml hyper¬baric bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.25 ml normal saline for the E group or 0.1 mg morphine in 0.25 ml normal saline for the M group will be administered using a 25-G spinal needle inserted into the L3-L4 space with the patient in the sitting position with complete sterilization. Then patients from both groups will be allowed to be in the supine position. Sensory block will be assessed using a pin prick every 2 minutes while the patient is in the supine position until the proper level will be reached (T10 dermatome), and the Bromage scale will be measured to reach bromage 3 before surgery (11). Any decrease in heart rate below 60/min will be treated with intravenous atropine (0.01 mg/kg), and any decrease in mean arterial pressure below 20% of the basal reading will be treated by fluid bolus and 5 mg intravenous increments of ephedrine.
* Failure of ESPB technique: Technique failure will be defined as if the correct spread of local anesthetic cranially and caudally from the injection point, dissect¬ing the plane between the transverse processes and erector spinae muscles is not im¬mediately visualized (10). Those patients were not included in our study and will be replaced by other patients.
* Failure of spinal anesthesia: Technique failure will be defined as if the T10 sensory level and/or Bromage 3 scale are not reached after 20 min. of spinal injection (11). So rescue general anesthesia will be initiated; those patients not included in our study will be replaced by others.
* For both groups, oral paracetamol 1 gm./6 hours and sustained-release diclofenac 75 mg/12 hours will be administered postoperatively regularly until hospital discharge.
* IF any patient enrolled in our study complains of a pain score \> 3 with regard to NPS in spite of the previously mentioned protocol for pain management, a rescue of 0.07 mg/kg IV morphine sulphate will be administrated, then NPS will be reassessed 15 minutes later if it is still \> 3 a rescue 0.05 mg/kg IV morphine sulphate will be administered, which can be repeated any time postoperatively until NRS is 3 or less, provided that total morphine consumption does not exceed 0.2 mg/kg/4 hours (12).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group {E}
patients in this group will receive Erector spinae plane block on the ipsilateral side of the surgery then 3.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.25 ml of normal saline intrathecal
erector spinae plane block
In the erector spinae plane block (group E), an ultrasound-guided block will be performed on the ipsilateral side of the surgery while the patient is in lateral position 3-5 cm from the midline (10). Moving cephalic from the sacrum, we will identify the L5, L4, and L3 transverse processes and erector spinae muscles posteriorly. A 21 G and 70mm length needle will be directed in-plane, and the needle tip will be positioned anterior to the erector spinae muscle at the corner of the transverse process. After the initial saline injection, dissection of the plane will be observed by injecting a total volume of 20 ml composed of 10 micrograms dexmedetomidine in 2ml of normal saline and 18 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%, which is far from the toxic dose (10). Correct placement is defined as the spread of local anesthetic cranially and caudally from the injection point, dissecting the plane between the transverse processes and erector spinae muscles.
Group {M}
patients in this group will receive 5 ml of subcutaneous lidocaine 1% then 3.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.1 mg of morphine in 0.25 ml of normal saline intrathecal.
Morphine
patients will receive 5 ml of subcutaneous lidocaine 1% then 3.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.1 mg of morphine in 0.25 ml of normal saline intrathecal
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
erector spinae plane block
In the erector spinae plane block (group E), an ultrasound-guided block will be performed on the ipsilateral side of the surgery while the patient is in lateral position 3-5 cm from the midline (10). Moving cephalic from the sacrum, we will identify the L5, L4, and L3 transverse processes and erector spinae muscles posteriorly. A 21 G and 70mm length needle will be directed in-plane, and the needle tip will be positioned anterior to the erector spinae muscle at the corner of the transverse process. After the initial saline injection, dissection of the plane will be observed by injecting a total volume of 20 ml composed of 10 micrograms dexmedetomidine in 2ml of normal saline and 18 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%, which is far from the toxic dose (10). Correct placement is defined as the spread of local anesthetic cranially and caudally from the injection point, dissecting the plane between the transverse processes and erector spinae muscles.
Morphine
patients will receive 5 ml of subcutaneous lidocaine 1% then 3.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.1 mg of morphine in 0.25 ml of normal saline intrathecal
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both genders.
* ASA I, II.
* Body mass index between 20 to 30 kg per meter square.
* Height between 160 cm and 180 cm
Exclusion Criteria
* Age below 18 and above 60 yrs. old.
* Uncooperative patients.
* Known Allergy to the drugs enrolled in the study.
* Body mass index \<30 or \< 20 kg per square meter
* Any contraindication of spinal anaesthesia
* ASA III, IV patients.
* Emergency surgery.
* Neuromuscular disorder interferes with sensations in the lower limbs.
* Drug abuse or using any drug that modifies pain perception.
* Any disability affecting walking capacity rather than the operating joint.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Karim Hussein
lecturer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine- Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MD-259-2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.