Cortical Excitability Sequential Changes in Response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Post Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03845595

Last Updated: 2019-02-19

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 40 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2018-01-14
• Study Completion Date: 2018-11-11

Brief Summary

This study was conducted to investigate the cortical excitability changes per session in response to the application of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation *LF-rTMS* on the contralesional hemisphere and its impact upon the upper limb motor performance post stroke. As well as, the minimum and maximum number of (LF-rTMS) sessions that would be recommended to achieve boosted enhancement in the cortical excitability findings and subsequently its impact upon the functional performance of the upper limb in stroke patients.Half of the patients were treated with the contralesional (LF-rTMS) in addition to conventional upper limb physical therapy interventions, while the other half received the conventional upper limb physical therapy interventions.

Detailed Description

Forty first ever ischemic stroke patients (3 to 6 months) were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups. Intervention for the study group consisted of 10 therapeutic( LF- rTMS) sessions, applied daily for two consecutive weeks in addition to their conventional upper limb physical therapy program. 1-hertz *HZ* stimulation was delivered at 90% of the contralesional Active Motor Threshold *cAMT* for 20 minutes over the contralesional motor' hot spot'. Sequential cortical excitability changes were examined by recording the contralesional Active Motor Threshold *cAMT* and the ipsilesional Active Motor Threshold *iAMT* at the end of every session for all patients in both groups throughout the 10 therapeutic consecutive sessions, While the sequential cortical excitability rate of change was measured by calculating the difference in the sessional values of (cAMT and iAMT) between two successive recordings throughout the 10 therapeutic consecutive sessions. Active motor threshold was assessed by the visible election of the contralateral first dorsal interosseous *FDI*. Upper limb motor performance was assessed using the Fugal-Myer Assessment Upper Extremity scale *FMA-UE* and hand grip dynamometer before and after the whole treatment protocol for all patients in both groups. All the forty patients had successfully accomplished the study procedures. The post treatment findings for cortical excitability and upper limb motor performance declared considerable difference between both groups. It was concluded that Four sessions is the recommended minimal number of (LF-rTMS) sessions that revealed highest significant difference in cortical excitability findings between both groups, relying on both the sessional findings of (cAMT) and the sessional findings of (iAMT). Also, The maximum recommended number of the inhibitory (rTMS) sessions that showed boosted enhancement in cortical excitability in relation to the control group was Eight sessions after which there was a plateau in the findings of the sequential rate of change either for the (cAMT) or the (iAMT) findings. Recovery of the upper limb motor function is closely related to the regain of cortical interhemispheric balance in stroke patients. Further research is needed to reveal whether the sequential changes in cortical excitability is correlated to the stroke onset or the degree of the general motor impairment post stroke. Also, further studies are recommended to figure out whether the recovery of the upper limb motor function is related to implemented number of inhibitory (rTMS) sessions.

Conditions

Stroke, Cardiovascular

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

(LF-rTMS) group

Patients in the study group were treated with the contralesional (LF-rTMS) once per day for 20 minutes, Daily, 5 sessions per week (Sunday to Thursday), for 2 consecutive weeks in addition to the conventional upper limb physical therapy interventions.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

(LF-rTMS) group

Intervention Type: DEVICE

The (LF-rTMS) (low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) group received 1-hertz (HZ) stimulation at 90% of motor threshold to the "hot spot" of the primary cerebral cortex, using a 70-mm figure- 8 coil and Magstim Rapid2 stimulator (Magstim Company, USA). Contralesional 1 HZ \*rTMS\* applied over the primary motor area "hot spot" at 90% of Active motor threshold . Each rTMS session consisted of 1,200pulses; lasting 20 minutes The optimal site of stimulation on the skull are known as the "hot spot" . "Hot spots" were found by searching for loci that triggered maximum visible contraction in the contralateral first dorsal interosseous \*FDI\* muscle, while the patient is contracting his whole limb as much as possible .

Control group

Patients in the control group were treated with the conventional upper limb physical therapy interventions (40 minutes to 1 hour, daily, 5 times per week for two consecutive weeks )

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control group

Intervention Type: OTHER

neurodevelopmental technique (NDT) ( including Bobath and Brunnstrom approaches , proprioceptor and exteroceptor stimulation for the weak and inhibition for the hyperactive muscle groups, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) specific techniques, Approximation and weight bearing, placing technique). Task-oriented training (moving, grasping and releasing bottles ,cups , small toys). Active participation of the whole hemiparetic upper extremity in different motor task training with coordination and Bilateral arm training exercise.

Interventions

(LF-rTMS) group

The (LF-rTMS) (low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) group received 1-hertz (HZ) stimulation at 90% of motor threshold to the "hot spot" of the primary cerebral cortex, using a 70-mm figure- 8 coil and Magstim Rapid2 stimulator (Magstim Company, USA). Contralesional 1 HZ \*rTMS\* applied over the primary motor area "hot spot" at 90% of Active motor threshold . Each rTMS session consisted of 1,200pulses; lasting 20 minutes The optimal site of stimulation on the skull are known as the "hot spot" . "Hot spots" were found by searching for loci that triggered maximum visible contraction in the contralateral first dorsal interosseous \*FDI\* muscle, while the patient is contracting his whole limb as much as possible .

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Control group

neurodevelopmental technique (NDT) ( including Bobath and Brunnstrom approaches , proprioceptor and exteroceptor stimulation for the weak and inhibition for the hyperactive muscle groups, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) specific techniques, Approximation and weight bearing, placing technique). Task-oriented training (moving, grasping and releasing bottles ,cups , small toys). Active participation of the whole hemiparetic upper extremity in different motor task training with coordination and Bilateral arm training exercise.

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Forty ischemic hemiparetic stroke patients aging between 50-65 years.
• Patients with first ever ischemic stroke in the territory of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) confirmed by physician with non-contrast computed tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain.
• Mild to moderate motor impairment verified according to (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)-motor arm score of 1 to 15, and modified Ashworths Scale (MAS) (1 or 1+)
• Time from onset of symptoms 3 to 6 months.
• Stable vital signs with clear consciousness and proper cooperation with assessment and treatment.
• Successful measurement of the Active motor threshold (AMT) from the 'motor hot spot' of the contralesional and the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) with the election of the contralateral first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle .
• The medical ethical committee from faculty of physical therapy, Cairo university approved the project of the study.
• All the patients or their families were given their written consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients who underwent surgical management including intravascular surgery or administration of tissue plasminogen activator .
• Patients with aphasia or apparent cognitive deficits ( eg, hand apraxia, unilateral spatial neglect) , visual field deficits or any psychiatric disorders or disturbed consciousness.
• Patients with serious general complications requiring intensive medical management (eg, pneumonia severe internal carotid artery stenosis or bilateral cerebrovascular lesion, heart failure, urinary tract infection, or malnutrition state)
• severe chronic or neurological diseases ( eg, shoulder pain; joint deformity or complete paralysis of the affected upper limb) .
• Any contraindications for rTMS in the guidelines (eg, patients with metal within the brain, such as clips for aneurysms, patients with a cardiac pacemaker, pregnant women, or a history of seizures or epilepsy).
• Use of any drugs that could have an effect on cortical excitability (eg, Anti-epileptic drugs).
• Patients previously underwent any type of treatments using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
• Refusal to sign the informed consent or could not carry out training or cooperate with assessments.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 50 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Kasr El Aini Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Engy B S Moustafa, Msc

Assistant Lecturer of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Disorders and Its Surgery

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Moushera H. Darwish, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Mohamed S. El-Tamawy, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Kasr El Aini Hospital

Locations

Faculty of physical therapy, Cairo University

Giza, Dokki, Egypt

Countries

Egypt

References

Blesneag AV, Slavoaca DF, Popa L, Stan AD, Jemna N, Isai Moldovan F, Muresanu DF. Low-frequency rTMS in patients with subacute ischemic stroke: clinical evaluation of short and long-term outcomes and neurophysiological assessment of cortical excitability. J Med Life. 2015 Jul-Sep;8(3):378-87.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26351545 (View on PubMed)

Carey JR, Deng H, Gillick BT, Cassidy JM, Anderson DC, Zhang L, Thomas W. Serial treatments of primed low-frequency rTMS in stroke: characteristics of responders vs. nonresponders. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(2):323-35. doi: 10.3233/RNN-130358.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24401168 (View on PubMed)

Di Lazzaro V, Ziemann U. The contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the functional evaluation of microcircuits in human motor cortex. Front Neural Circuits. 2013 Feb 13;7:18. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00018. eCollection 2013.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23407686 (View on PubMed)

Du J, Tian L, Liu W, Hu J, Xu G, Ma M, Fan X, Ye R, Jiang Y, Yin Q, Zhu W, Xiong Y, Yang F, Liu X. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery and motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Neurol. 2016 Nov;23(11):1666-1672. doi: 10.1111/ene.13105. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27425785 (View on PubMed)

Zhang L, Xing G, Shuai S, Guo Z, Chen H, McClure MA, Chen X, Mu Q. Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis. Neural Plast. 2017;2017:2758097. doi: 10.1155/2017/2758097. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29435371 (View on PubMed)

Graef P, Dadalt MLR, Rodrigues DAMDS, Stein C, Pagnussat AS. Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with upper-limb training for improving function after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2016 Oct 15;369:149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27653882 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

P.T.REC/012/001647

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id