Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

NCT ID: NCT02899637

Last Updated: 2016-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective is to conduct a study protocol to investigate the effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on sensory and motor performance of individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) . A double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial of patients with iSCI will be conducted.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Effective rehabilitation programs for individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) are required either in the acute or in the post-acute care. Rehabilitation techniques based on protocols that selectively stimulate specific pathways along the central nervous system have been considered effective in enhancing neurologic recovery thereby improving functional abilities. The rationale relies on the assumption that the stimulation of the corticospinal tract, primary motor cortex, and spinal cord might induce neuronal reorganization of structures that are largely involved in the control of voluntary movements. In this line of reasoning, protocols involving repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have been found effective in enhancing corticospinal synaptic transmission, attenuating neuropathic pain, improving spasticity and sensorimotor function after iSCI. However, controversial findings have also been reported, as other studies showed unaltered central pain, as well as cortical excitability and sensorimotor function. The lack of consistent results is probably associated with differences in stimulation parameters, number of sessions, site of stimulation, chronicity and levels of injury, and outcome measurements of the previous studies. Thus, it is clear that there are remaining gaps in our knowledge and the development of new studies, preferably prospective fully double-blind placebo-controlled trials, is necessary to complement the current knowledge about the effects of rTMS in patients with iSCI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spinal Cord Injury (Active Group)

Active high-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Active high-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Active intervention, 5Hz on the lower limbs area of the motor cortex, during one week

Spinal Cord Injury (Control group)

Sham high-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham high-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham intervention, 5Hz on the lower limbs area of the motor cortex, during one week

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active high-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Active intervention, 5Hz on the lower limbs area of the motor cortex, during one week

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham high-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Sham intervention, 5Hz on the lower limbs area of the motor cortex, during one week

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have a clinical diagnosis of iSCI with nonprogressive etiology
* Clinical stability
* Aged between 18-60 years old
* Score equal to 24 in the Mini-Mental State Examination
* No electroencephalography alterations
* Absence of depression assessed by Hamilton Depression Scale
* Currently receiving inpatient rehabilitation in Physiotherapy Health Center of University of the State of Paraiba, Brazil.

Exclusion Criteria

* Have metal prosthesis in some part of the body
* Use cardiac pacemaker
* Present dementia or neurological disorders which can increase cortical excitability
* Have psychotic or schizophrenic disorders
* Take drugs that reduce seizure threshold or spasticity.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Estadual da Paraiba

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fernando Henrique Magalhães

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fernando H Magalhaes, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sao Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidade Estadual da Paraiba

Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Amanda Vitoria L Araujo

Role: CONTACT

+55 (11) 971212653

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Belci M, Catley M, Husain M, Frankel HL, Davey NJ. Magnetic brain stimulation can improve clinical outcome in incomplete spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord. 2004 Jul;42(7):417-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101613.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15111994 (View on PubMed)

Benito J, Kumru H, Murillo N, Costa U, Medina J, Tormos JM, Pascual-Leone A, Vidal J. Motor and gait improvement in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury induced by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012 Spring;18(2):106-12. doi: 10.1310/sci1802-106.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23459246 (View on PubMed)

Bunday KL, Perez MA. Motor recovery after spinal cord injury enhanced by strengthening corticospinal synaptic transmission. Curr Biol. 2012 Dec 18;22(24):2355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.046. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23200989 (View on PubMed)

Defrin R, Grunhaus L, Zamir D, Zeilig G. The effect of a series of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations of the motor cortex on central pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;88(12):1574-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.025.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18047871 (View on PubMed)

Jette F, Cote I, Meziane HB, Mercier C. Effect of single-session repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the hand versus leg motor area on pain after spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Sep;27(7):636-43. doi: 10.1177/1545968313484810. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23579183 (View on PubMed)

Kang BS, Shin HI, Bang MS. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the hand motor cortical area on central pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1766-71. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19801069 (View on PubMed)

Kumru H, Murillo N, Samso JV, Valls-Sole J, Edwards D, Pelayo R, Valero-Cabre A, Tormos JM, Pascual-Leone A. Reduction of spasticity with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Jun;24(5):435-41. doi: 10.1177/1545968309356095. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20053952 (View on PubMed)

Kuppuswamy A, Balasubramaniam AV, Maksimovic R, Mathias CJ, Gall A, Craggs MD, Ellaway PH. Action of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on sensory, motor and autonomic function in human spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;122(12):2452-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.022. Epub 2011 May 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21600843 (View on PubMed)

Lammertse D, Tuszynski MH, Steeves JD, Curt A, Fawcett JW, Rask C, Ditunno JF, Fehlings MG, Guest JD, Ellaway PH, Kleitman N, Blight AR, Dobkin BH, Grossman R, Katoh H, Privat A, Kalichman M; International Campaign for Cures of Spinal Cord Injury Paralysis. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial design. Spinal Cord. 2007 Mar;45(3):232-42. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102010. Epub 2006 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17179970 (View on PubMed)

Oudega M, Perez MA. Corticospinal reorganization after spinal cord injury. J Physiol. 2012 Aug 15;590(16):3647-63. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.233189. Epub 2012 May 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22586214 (View on PubMed)

Tazoe T, Perez MA. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on recovery of function after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S145-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.418. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25175159 (View on PubMed)

Yilmaz B, Kesikburun S, Yasar E, Tan AK. The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on refractory neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Jul;37(4):397-400. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000172. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24621025 (View on PubMed)

de Araujo AVL, Barbosa VRN, Galdino GS, Fregni F, Massetti T, Fontes SL, de Oliveira Silva D, da Silva TD, Monteiro CBM, Tonks J, Magalhaes FH. Effects of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on functional performance in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Nov 6;18(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2280-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29110687 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18753713.0.0000.5187

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brain Stimulation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02292589 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2