The Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT06889922
Last Updated: 2025-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-01
2022-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy on Lower Extremity Motor Development in Stroke Patients
NCT05554861
The Effect of Repetative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Stroke Patients
NCT05738863
The Effect of rTMS in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury (rTMS:Repetetive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation)
NCT04372134
Stroke Therapy With Brain Oscillation Synchronized Stimulation
NCT05005780
Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Upper Extremity Motor Function in Stroke Patients
NCT05646134
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our study is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. According to the statistical analysis 20 patients who were registered at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital between July 2021 and May 2022 and met the study criteria were included. Patients were divided into two groups using a computer-based randomization program: a 1 Hz rTMS group (n=10) and a sham group (n=10). The researcher conducting the clinical assessments was blinded to the group assignments of the patients. Furthermore, the patients themselves were unaware of which group they had been assigned to. Active stimulation was applied to the M1 region of the non-lesional hemisphere using a 70-mm figure-eight coil, while the sham group received the same protocol with a sham coil that visually resembled the active coil. The coil was initially placed tangentially over the presumed motor cortex, and the motor hotspot was identified by applying single pulses at different positions until the lowest intensity produced a significant motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. The resting motor threshold (rMT) was then determined as the lowest intensity to produce an MEP amplitude larger than 50 mV in more than 5 out of 10 trials. In the active treatment group, 1200 pulses at 90% of rMT were delivered to the hotspot of the first dorsal interosseous muscle in the contralesional hemisphere across 10 sessions over two weeks, while the sham group received sham stimulation. Safety protocols were followed, and both groups underwent physical therapy, including upper extremity exercises and occupational therapy, within 30 minutes after each TMS session.
Clinical evaluations were conducted three times for each patient: Baseline (before treatment), 2nd week (at the and of treatment), and 6th week.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active rTMS
Patients received a total of 10 sessions active rTMS on M1 region of the non-lesional hemisphere. TMS coil was initially placed tangentially to the scalp over the presumed motor cortex area. The motor hotspot is defined as the location where the lowest stimulus intensity consistently produces a significant motor-evoked potentials (MEP) in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Once the hotspot was identified, the resting motor threshold (rMT) was determined as the lowest single pulse TMS intensity required to produce a MEP amplitude larger than 50 mV in more than 5 out of 10 trials from the first dorsal interosseous muscle. 1200 pulses at 90% of the rMT were delivered to the hotspot of the first dorsal interosseous muscle in the contralesional hemisphere. A routine physical therapy and rehabilitation program, including range of motion exercises for the upper extremity, neurophysiological exercises, and occupational therapy, was applied to patients within 30 min after TMS sessions.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Magstim Rapid2 Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland Dyfed, UK), 70 mm Figure-of-eight Coil
Sham rTMS
Patients received a total of 10 sessions sham rTMS on M1 region of the non-lesional hemisphere. However, a sham coil was used for stimulation, thus no actual stimulation was administered to the patients. Instead, the sham coil produced a sensation resembling real stimulation, with sounds and sensations on the scalp that simulated the feeling of active stimulation. A routine physical therapy and rehabilitation program, including range of motion exercises for the upper extremity, neurophysiological exercises, and occupational therapy, was applied to patients within 30 min after TMS sessions.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham
Magstim Rapid2 Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland Dyfed, UK), 70 mm Figure-of-eight Sham Coil
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Magstim Rapid2 Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland Dyfed, UK), 70 mm Figure-of-eight Coil
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham
Magstim Rapid2 Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland Dyfed, UK), 70 mm Figure-of-eight Sham Coil
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 6 months and at most 2 years having passed since the stroke,
* Spasticity in wrist flexors and finger flexors at levels 1+, 2, or 3 according to the modified Ashworth scale,
* Being between 18-75 years old,
* Having a Mini-Mental Test score of ≥ 24,
* If using antispastic medication, no change in medication dosage in the last month.
Exclusion Criteria
* Having a metallic materials in the area to be stimulated (such as a cochlear implant, brain pacemaker, or drug pump),
* Alcoholism,
* Pregnancy,
* Severe and newly decompensated heart failure,
* Using medications that lower the seizure threshold.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Serhat Özdoğan
MD, Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elif Yalçın, Prof, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AnkaraCHBilkent-PMR-Ozdogan
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.