Stroke Therapy With Brain Oscillation Synchronized Stimulation
NCT ID: NCT05005780
Last Updated: 2023-08-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-02
2022-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Stroke Patients
NCT06889922
Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy on Lower Extremity Motor Development in Stroke Patients
NCT05554861
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Treatment of Post-Stroke Spasticity
NCT02268461
Primed vs. Unprimed rTMS in Chronic Stroke
NCT01757821
Preliminary Study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT00050128
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Repetitive TMS is capable of inducing plasticity-like effects in the brain, that are expected to enhance adaptive plasticity processes leading to functional regain after stroke. In the motor cortex, brain oscillation-synchronized TMS, i.e. TMS triggered dependent on the phase of instantaneous µ-alpha oscillations as detected by real-time EEG (electroencephalography) analysis, has been shown to consistently increase motor cortical excitability and plasticity effects. We therefore hypothesis that a greater therapeutic potential of TMS to modulate dysfunctional brain networks can be exploited by personalizing TMS therapy to individual brain states (i.e. brain oscillations).
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of an ipsilesional 100 Hz TMS triplet burst protocol synchronized to the ongoing µ-alpha oscillation compared to the current TMS standard therapy of contralesional 1 Hz rTMS in chronic stroke patients. Both groups will undergo stimulation therapy three times a week, with each session directly followed by physiotherapy. Motor recovery will be assessed directly after as well as three months after completion of the therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
µ-alpha oscillation coupled ipsilesional 100 Hz triplet bursts
µ-rhythm (The µ rhythm frequency band is defined by activity falling between 8 and 13 Hz and recorded by scalp electrodes over the sensorimotor cortex during waking neural activity) negative peak triggered TMS of ipsilesional primary motor cortex, consisting of 400 triple pulses at 100 Hz, delivered at a mean inter-triple pulse interval of 3.0 s. Stimulation intensity: 100% resting motor threshold.
Negative peak triggered 100 Hz triplet burst TMS
MagVenture MagPro X100: Ipsilesional negative peak triggered 100 Hz triplet burst TMS.
contralesional 1 Hz rTMS
1200 stimuli to the contralesional primary motor cortex at 1 Hz. Stimulation intensity: 115% resting motor threshold.
1 Hz rTMS
MagVenture MagPro X100: Contralesional 1 Hz rTMS.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Negative peak triggered 100 Hz triplet burst TMS
MagVenture MagPro X100: Ipsilesional negative peak triggered 100 Hz triplet burst TMS.
1 Hz rTMS
MagVenture MagPro X100: Contralesional 1 Hz rTMS.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient suffers from chronic stroke including hand/arm paresis and spasticity
3. Ipsilesional motor evoked potentials (MEPs) can be evoked (EMG \> 50uV)
4. RMT of contralesional side \< 70% maximum stimulator output (MSO)
5. Patient is willing to comply with the study restrictions.
6. Subject FMA-UE at the lesioned side is \<= 60.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient has a history of seizure disorder.
3. Patient with intake of pro-convulsive medication, e.g. , chlorpromazine, clozapine, foscarnet, ganciclovir, ritonavir, amphetamines, cocaine, MDMA (ecstasy), phencyclidine (PCP, angel's dust), ketamine, gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), alcohol, theophylline, in accord with present consensus guidelines on safety, ethical considerations, and application of TMS in clinical practice and research (Rossi et al., 2009, 2021).
4. Subject with intake of muscle-relaxing medication (e.g. baclofen, tizanidine, gabapentin,tolperisone, THC and derivates)
5. When spasticity is treated with botox there have to be at least tree months since the last injection
6. Patient has a cardiac pacemaker, implanted medication pump, intracardiac line, that is located close to (≤ 10 cm) to the location of activation of the TMS coil or acute, unstable cardiac disease.
7. Patient has an intracranial implant (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimula-tors, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object that is located close to (≤ 10 cm) to the location of activation of the TMS coil (excluding the mouth) and that cannot be safely removed.
8. Patient has participated in another study within 2 weeks prior to the first study visit.
9. Patient is pregnant or trying to get pregnant.
10. Patient is unable to give informed consent.
11. Patient is unable to understand the instructions of the FMA-UE or not motivated to follow these instructions.
12. Patients who have contractions and therefore can't move.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Tuebingen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ulf Ziemann, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Neurology and Stroke
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Tübingen, Department for Neurology and Stroke
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mahmoud W, Baur D, Zrenner B, Brancaccio A, Belardinelli P, Ramos-Murguialday A, Zrenner C, Ziemann U. Brain state-dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor stroke rehabilitation: a proof of concept randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 26;15:1427198. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1427198. eCollection 2024.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-07, Version 4
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.