Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

NCT ID: NCT05601921

Last Updated: 2023-07-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-01

Study Completion Date

2023-07-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Shoulder pain after stroke is one of the most common complications of stroke. Underlying mechanisms of shoulder pain after stroke still completely is not clarified. Central sensitization and neuropathic pain mechanisms are thought to play a role in the etiology of pain. Research on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy in the treatment of pain in which somatosensory sensitization mechanisms play a role is increasing day by day. There are studies showing that application of high-frequency rTMS to the primary motor cortex provides effective pain relieving in most of painful conditions. However, data in the literature regarding the application of high-frequency rTMS in shoulder pain after stroke are very limited. There is only one clinical study related to this. More studies are needed in this area.In our study, it was aimed to examine the effects of this treatment protocol applied on the effects of pain on daily activities, upper extremity disability, anxiety, depression, range of motion and neurophysiological parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke is one of the most common causes of disability and death in the adult population. Many complications such as depression, shoulder pain, falls, urinary system infections can develop after stroke. These complications prevent stroke rehabilitation and delay functional recovery. Hemiplegic shoulder pain is also one of the most common complications after stroke. Many possible causes underlying its development have been described; It may develop due to many pathologies such as rotator cuff lesions, biceps tendinopathy, soft tissue disorders such as myofascial pain, glenohumeral subluxation, spasticity, changes in peripheral and central nervous system activity. Many options such as joint range of motion (ROM) exercises, electrical stimulation, analgesics, intra-articular injections of corticosteroids, botulinum toxin-A injections are used in the management of pain. However, current treatment options provide limited pain relief, which causes chronic pain in many patients. This suggests that post-stroke shoulder pain is not only due to simple nociceptive stimuli from the shoulder joint, but also includes nociceptive and neuropathic mechanisms related to both the peripheral and central nervous systems. In recent years, TMS studies have been conducted in many painful conditions, which are thought to have complex pain mechanisms in the pathogenesis, and its effectiveness has been reported.In our study, it was aimed to examine the effects of this treatment protocol applied on the effects of pain on daily activities, upper extremity disability, anxiety, depression, range of motion and neurophysiological parameters.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post-stroke Shoulder Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active stimulation group

Patients in the real stimulation group will receive rTMS treatment to the motor cortex (M1) of the affected hemisphere at a frequency of 5 Hz, once a day for 3 weeks and a total of 15 sessions. The application will be performed with Neurosoft-Neuro MS / D device. Before each session, the patient's resting motor threshold (RMT) value will be determined. RMT will be detected by obtaining a motor evoked potential of \>50 μV amplitude on electromyography recording of the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 stimulations to the primary motor cortex.The stimulus intensity to be used in the treatment will be set as 90% of the motor threshold for the affected motor cortex and 100% of the motor threshold for the unaffected motor cortex.One session of stimulation will last for a total of 20 minutes and a total of 1000 pulses in the form of 5 Hz stimulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive intervention that uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells to improve the symptoms of a variety of disorders. In recent years, TMS studies have been conducted in many painful conditions, which are thought to have complex pain mechanisms in the pathogenesis, and its effectiveness has been reported.

Sham stimulation group

Fifteen sessions of sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment will be applied to the lesional primary motor cortex. The application will be performed with Neurosoft-Neuro MS / D device. The probe of the device will be held perpendicular to the motor cortex and operated from the lowest operating power of 1, so that the device makes the same sounds as the active application.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive intervention that uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells to improve the symptoms of a variety of disorders. In recent years, TMS studies have been conducted in many painful conditions, which are thought to have complex pain mechanisms in the pathogenesis, and its effectiveness has been reported.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being between the ages of 18-70
* Presence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by MRI
* Having a stroke for the first time
* Presence of stroke in the subacute or chronic period
* Presence of subacute or chronic shoulder pain starting after stroke and Numeric Rating Scale \>4
* If the patient is receiving analgesic treatment, the pain persists despite at least one week of analgesic treatment.
* Patients who agreed to participate by signing the informed permission form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of history of surgical intervention on the shoulder joint
* Presence of history of peri/intraarticular injection into the shoulder joint
* Rotator cuff injury or tendonitis, frozen shoulder, etc. that they had diagnosed/treated before stroke
* Presence of full-thickness rotator cuff tear visualized by US
* Presence of \>3 spasticity in the upper extremity defined according to the Modified Ashworth Scale
* Presence of severe cognitive impairment
* Presence of aphasia
* History of malignancy or systemic rheumatic disease
* Alcohol or drug addiction
* History of psychiatric illness such as major depression/personality disorders
* History of epilepsy or taking medication due to epilepsy
* Diagnosed with dementia
* Pregnancy and breastfeeding
* Having received TMS treatment before
* Having a clinical condition (metallic implant, cardiac pace, head trauma, cranial operation history…) that would be a contraindication for TMS
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Izmir Katip Celebi University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yagmur Aydin

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ayhan Aşkın, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Izmir Katip Çelebi University

Yağmur Aydın, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Izmir Katip Çelebi University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi

Izmir, Karabağlar / İ̇zmi̇r, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bergen DC, Silberberg D. Nervous system disorders: a global epidemic. Arch Neurol. 2002 Jul;59(7):1194-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.7.1194.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12117370 (View on PubMed)

Langhorne P, Stott DJ, Robertson L, MacDonald J, Jones L, McAlpine C, Dick F, Taylor GS, Murray G. Medical complications after stroke: a multicenter study. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1223-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1223.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10835436 (View on PubMed)

McLean DE. Medical complications experienced by a cohort of stroke survivors during inpatient, tertiary-level stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Mar;85(3):466-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00484-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15031834 (View on PubMed)

Kalichman L, Ratmansky M. Underlying pathology and associated factors of hemiplegic shoulder pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Sep;90(9):768-80. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318214e976.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21430513 (View on PubMed)

Viana R, Pereira S, Mehta S, Miller T, Teasell R. Evidence for therapeutic interventions for hemiplegic shoulder pain during the chronic stage of stroke: a review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;19(6):514-22. doi: 10.1310/tsr1906-514.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23192716 (View on PubMed)

Roosink M, Renzenbrink GJ, Geurts AC, Ijzerman MJ. Towards a mechanism-based view on post-stroke shoulder pain: theoretical considerations and clinical implications. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;30(2):153-65. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0739.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22430581 (View on PubMed)

Choi GS, Chang MC. Effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on reducing hemiplegic shoulder pain in patients with chronic stoke: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Neurosci. 2018 Feb;128(2):110-116. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2017.1367682. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28805107 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-TDU-TIPF-0013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.