Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Primary Cortex in Patients With Neuropathic Pain and Cancer
NCT ID: NCT07187219
Last Updated: 2025-09-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-13
2029-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, its efficacy in chronic neuropathic pain related to cancer has not yet been specifically studied, and it therefore remains relatively inaccessible for these patients. This project is a cross-over, double-blinded, and placebo-control study, including 5 sessions of either M1 or "sham" rTMS, a wash-out period (8 weeks), followed by 5 sessions of the other stimulation option (I.e., two arms: M1-sham or sham-M1; order randomized between patients). Treatment efficacy will be assessed in comparison to the placebo condition. Primary outcome is the percentage of pain relief between active and sham rTMS. Other variables to describe quality of life, sensory, neuropathic, and mood states as well as resting-state fMRI will be collected before and after treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Analgesic Effects of rTMS in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
NCT02010281
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Central Neuropathic Pain
NCT02386969
Effectiveness of rTMS on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer Neuropathic Pain. Clinical Trial.
NCT05480410
rTMS as a Treatment of Neuropathic Pain Secondary to Malignancy
NCT02078479
Optimize the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neuropathic Pain
NCT05338554
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active rTMS - Sham
5 stimulation sessions on M1 - washout 8 weeks - 5 sham stimulation sessions (placebo-control, same site, inactive stimulation)
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) - active
rTMS session active on the primary motor cortex
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) - inactive
rTMS session inactive on the primary motor cortex
Sham - Active rTMS
5 sham stimulation sessions (placebo-control, same site, inactive stimulation) - washout 8 weeks - 5 stimulation sessions on M1
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) - active
rTMS session active on the primary motor cortex
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) - inactive
rTMS session inactive on the primary motor cortex
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) - active
rTMS session active on the primary motor cortex
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) - inactive
rTMS session inactive on the primary motor cortex
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient who has received informed information about the study and who has co-signed, with the investigator, a consent form to participate in the study.
* Patient aged 18 to 85 (male or female),
* Central or peripheral neuropathic pain related to cancer and/or its treatment;
* Chronic pain (present for more than 4 months) whose intensity is greater than or equal to 4/10 on a VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) numerical scale.
* Pain present on a daily or almost daily basis (at least 4 days a week)
* Patient not completely relieved by recommended first- and second-line drug treatments for neuropathic pain
* Stable analgesic treatment (no new treatment or dosage adjustment) for at least one month and will not need to be modified for the duration of the study.
* Patient can be followed throughout the study.
* Indication for rTMS of the motor cortex by a neurologist.
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindication to rTMS or MRI (treatment with seismotherapy during the previous month; history of cranial trauma; intracranial hypertension; intracerebral metal clip; piercing; pacemaker; insulin pump; metal prosthesis; pregnant or breast-feeding woman; claustrophobia).
* Chronic alcoholism
* Abuse of drugs or psychoactive substances
* Neuropathic pain as part of a progressive pathology (e.g. HIV),
* Presence of other pain of greater intensity than the neuropathic pain leading to inclusion
* Acute stroke (\< 3 months)
* Patient with brain tumour lesions
* Patient with infectious or metabolic brain lesions
* Patients with severe or recent cardiac disorders
* Patients with cognitive impairment
* Patient unable to understand informed consent,
* Patients refusing to stop or unable to stop treatments prohibited during the study, such as morphine.
* Patients participating in another research protocol involving a medicinal product within 30 days prior to inclusion.
* Patients deprived of their liberty or under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice, family habilitation).
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roland PEYRON, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU SAINT-ETIENNE
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
PEYRON Roland
Saint-Etienne, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-A01195-42
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
24CH024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.