Effects and Mechanism of Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation on Neuropathic Pain

NCT ID: NCT05168319

Last Updated: 2023-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

94 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-28

Study Completion Date

2023-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Neuropathic pain (NP) is one type of refractory chronic pain condition,medical treatments for NP is limited because of its poorly response. A noninvasive brain-stimulation method called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has garnered interest as an alternative treatment for intractable NP potentially through inducing therapeutic brain plasticity.Indeed, high-frequency (≥ 5 Hz) Repetitive TMS (rTMS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) is suggested to be able to reduce neuropathic pain in randomized controlled studies.Overall, the clinical application of rTMS in chronic pain is still limited by the response rate,the investigation of rTMS protocols is important for improving rTMS analgesia. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) mimics the bursts of neuronal firing which results in robust long-term potentiation. Continuous TBS (cTBS) is designed to decrease excitability, whereby prolonged cTBS (pcTBS, i.e. multiple cTBS being delivered continuously) has recently been demonstrated to increase excitability. More importantly, pcTBS was found to have comparable or even better analgesic effects than standard 10 Hz rTMS. These findings together call for more studies to validate the analgesic efficacy of pcTBS.

In this study, the investigators aim to assess and compare the efficacy of prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (pcTBS) with 10HZ rTMS in NP patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators designed a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study at 1 center. fifty NP patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups. A series of 5 daily pcTBS(1200 pulses/session) or 10-Hz rTMS (1500 pulses/session) of primary motor cortex (M1) or sham stimulation was applied to each patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuropathic Pain Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

fifty NP patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Patients and assessors were blind to group assignment until the study was completed.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

pcTBS

pcTBS was administered to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants received pcTBS protocol consisted of 5 sessions over 5 consecutive workdays

10HZ rTMS

The rTMS protocol included 15 trains of 10-second stimulation given at 10 Hz to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), with the inter-train interval being set to 50 seconds (1500 pulses)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants received 10HZ rTMS protocol consisted of 5 sessions over 5 consecutive workdays

Sham

The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same protocol, with the coil being orientated at 90° to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scal

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants received Sham rTMS stimulations consisted of 5 sessions over 5 consecutive workdays

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Participants received 10HZ rTMS protocol consisted of 5 sessions over 5 consecutive workdays

Intervention Type DEVICE

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Participants received pcTBS protocol consisted of 5 sessions over 5 consecutive workdays

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham stimulation

Participants received Sham rTMS stimulations consisted of 5 sessions over 5 consecutive workdays

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* (1)woman or man over 18 and under 70 years old; (2)pain fulfilling the criteria for probable or definite peripheral neuropathic pain ; (3) pain for at least 3 months, continuous pain (at least four days per week), at least moderate intensity (≥ 4/10 assessed by VAS) ; (4) stable pharmacological treatment for pain at least 2 weeks before inclusion; (5) able to cooperate in completing questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria

* (1) Any clinically significant or unstable ongoing medical or psychiatric disorder including major depression; (2) History of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs); (3) Past treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); (4) Contraindications to rTMS (previous severe head trauma or neurosurgical intervention, past or current epilepsy, active brain tumor, intracranial hypertension, implanted ferromagnetic devices, e.g., cardiac pacemaker, neurostimulator, or cochlear implants); (5) other type of pain more severe than neuropathic pain; (6) Any difficulty to fill out questionnaires (due to language or cognitive problems); (7) impossibility to be followed during the time course of the study;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

min yan, prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-0751

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.