Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Temporomandibular Disorders.
NCT ID: NCT06813040
Last Updated: 2025-02-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-01
2027-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
rTMS Effects in the Neuromodulation and Pain Threshold of Chronic Myofascial Pain Patients
NCT01964729
Effectiveness Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Patients With Chronic Tinnitus
NCT00876720
Objective Diagnosis Method and Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Treatment for Tinnitus
NCT02617953
Therapeutic Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulaton on Tinnitus
NCT02071732
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Treatment for Tinnitus
NCT01886092
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is estimated that TMD affects 5 to 12% of the population and is considered the second most prevalent musculoskeletal disorder, behind only chronic low back pain. Pain, joint noises, and limitation of mandibular movements are the main signs and symptoms of TMD. TMJ noises and limited jaw movements are often associated with intra-articular TMD. On the other hand, pain is a common symptom in different types of TMD, and it can be localized or diffuse and even as otalgia or headache. It is assumed that 30 to 40% of cases of acute painful TMD becomes chronic. Chronic pain impacts professional and social activities, emotional state, and quality of life. The pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic orofacial pain are complex and multifaceted, and not yet fully understood. In addition, the coexistence of psychological factors associated with the vast number of peripheral and central mechanisms (for example, functional and structural neuroplasticity and, more specifically, peripheral and central sensitization) makes the treatment of chronic orofacial pain a challenge extremely complex.
TMD treatment comprises a wide range of therapeutic modalities. Conservative treatments constitute the first therapeutic option, aiming to reduce joint and muscle overload, control local inflammatory factors, and reduce some risk factors, such as waking bruxism and psychological disorders. However, due to the complexity of chronic TMDs, some patients remain refractory to current therapeutic methods. Thus, several efforts have been made to develop therapies to treat neuroplastic changes associated with chronic pain. In this regard, transcranial stimulation methods appear to be a promising treatment. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive, safe, and approved method for clinical use in psychiatric disorders and chronic pain. Recent scientific evidence has demonstrated that high-frequency TMS when applied to the motor cortex (M1), presents short-term effectiveness in reducing chronic pain and improving quality of life. A systematic review conducted by Ferreira demonstrated promising results of TMS in orofacial pain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active rTMS
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over motor cortex.
Active rTMS
Repetitive TMS will be applied at 10Hz on the motor cortex. The protocol consists of 2000 pulses per session and an intensity of 90% of the resting motor threshold. There will be 10 sessions with a minimum interval of 24 hours and a maximum of 72 hours. A figure-8 coil will be used.
Sham rTMS
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over motor cortex.
Sham rTMS
The sham TMS will have the same visual and sound characteristics, but without the passage of the magnetic field to the scalp.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active rTMS
Repetitive TMS will be applied at 10Hz on the motor cortex. The protocol consists of 2000 pulses per session and an intensity of 90% of the resting motor threshold. There will be 10 sessions with a minimum interval of 24 hours and a maximum of 72 hours. A figure-8 coil will be used.
Sham rTMS
The sham TMS will have the same visual and sound characteristics, but without the passage of the magnetic field to the scalp.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pain duration longer than 6 months.
* Intensity of orofacial pain greater than 5 on the visual analogue scale (VAS).
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women
* Individuals with any impediment to MRI: having a pacemaker or implantable defibrillator, cochlear implant, ferromagnetic aneurysm clips, electrodes used for deep brain stimulation, ocular implants, Swan-Ganz catheter, orthopedic prostheses or metallic bodies close to the area of interest.
* Individuals with any contraindication for transcranial magnetic stimulation: have focal or generalized encephalopathies, increased intracranial pressure, and severe heart disease; history of head trauma, epilepsy, and individuals with first-degree relatives diagnosed with idiopathic epilepsy; use of drugs that lower the seizure threshold (tricyclic antidepressants and antipsychotics); chronic use of alcohol or epileptogenic drugs.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Coimbra
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Miguel Castelo-Branco
Full Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Miguel Castel-Branco, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
ICNAS - Institute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health
Catarina Duarte, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ICNAS - Institute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health
Natália Ferreira, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Coimbra
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Coimbra
Coimbra, , Portugal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Okeson JP, de Leeuw R. Differential diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders and other orofacial pain disorders. Dent Clin North Am. 2011 Jan;55(1):105-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.08.007.
Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, List T, Svensson P, Gonzalez Y, Lobbezoo F, Michelotti A, Brooks SL, Ceusters W, Drangsholt M, Ettlin D, Gaul C, Goldberg LJ, Haythornthwaite JA, Hollender L, Jensen R, John MT, De Laat A, de Leeuw R, Maixner W, van der Meulen M, Murray GM, Nixdorf DR, Palla S, Petersson A, Pionchon P, Smith B, Visscher CM, Zakrzewska J, Dworkin SF; International RDC/TMD Consortium Network, International association for Dental Research; Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Groupdagger. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
Lovgren A, Haggman-Henrikson B, Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F, Marklund S, Wanman A. Temporomandibular pain and jaw dysfunction at different ages covering the lifespan--A population based study. Eur J Pain. 2016 Apr;20(4):532-40. doi: 10.1002/ejp.755. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
Rammelsberg P, LeResche L, Dworkin S, Mancl L. Longitudinal outcome of temporomandibular disorders: a 5-year epidemiologic study of muscle disorders defined by research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2003 Winter;17(1):9-20.
Cohen SP, Mao J. Neuropathic pain: mechanisms and their clinical implications. BMJ. 2014 Feb 5;348:f7656. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7656.
Yin Y, He S, Xu J, You W, Li Q, Long J, Luo L, Kemp GJ, Sweeney JA, Li F, Chen S, Gong Q. The neuro-pathophysiology of temporomandibular disorders-related pain: a systematic review of structural and functional MRI studies. J Headache Pain. 2020 Jun 19;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01131-4.
de Souza RF, Lovato da Silva CH, Nasser M, Fedorowicz Z, Al-Muharraqi MA. Interventions for the management of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD007261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007261.pub2.
Greene CS, Manfredini D. Transitioning to chronic temporomandibular disorder pain: A combination of patient vulnerabilities and iatrogenesis. J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Sep;48(9):1077-1088. doi: 10.1111/joor.13180. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
O'Connell NE, Marston L, Spencer S, DeSouza LH, Wand BM. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 16;3(3):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub4.
Ferreira NR, Junqueira YN, Correa NB, Fonseca EO, Brito NBM, Menezes TA, Magini M, Fidalgo TKS, Ferreira DMTP, de Lima RL, Carvalho AC, DosSantos MF. The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic orofacial pain: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 15;14(8):e0221110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221110. eCollection 2019.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ICNAS-FM-10,2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.