Analgesic Effects of rTMS in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
NCT ID: NCT02010281
Last Updated: 2019-06-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
152 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-03-31
2019-05-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The medical device of study: transcranial magnetic stimulator (TMS).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Central Neuropathic Pain
NCT02386969
Analgesic Effect of Accelerated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain
NCT05295498
Analgesic Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Central Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis
NCT02059096
Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Primary Cortex in Patients With Neuropathic Pain and Cancer
NCT07187219
Comparison of the Efficacy of rTMS and tDCS of the Motor Cortex in Patients With Chronic Neuropathic Pain
NCT02030626
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The patients will be randomized to receive one of 3 treatment arms : rTMS of the motor cortex, rTMS of the prefrontal cortex, or placebo (sham stimulation) of the motor or prefrontal cortex. The study will be double blind, eg the patient and the investigator will not know the nature of treatment. the stimulation protocol will consist of an induction phasse of 5 daily sessions then a maintenance phase of several sessions : 3 sessions a week apart, 3 sessions a fortnight apart, and 3 sessions 3 weeks apart. The statistical analysis will be conducted in the intent to treat population and using a modified ITT analysis excluding all the patients with protocol violation (primary outcome). The per protocol population will also be assessed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
rTMS of the motor cortex (Magventure)
experimental : rTMS of the motor cortex : repetitive magnetic stimulation targeting the motor cortex assisted by neuronavigation
rTMS of prefrontal or motor cortex
description:rTMS of the motor or prefrontal cortex (repetitive magnetic stimulation targeting the motor or prefrontal cortex) assisted with neuronavigation
rTMS placebo (magventure)
sham stimulation of the motor or prefrontal cortex with the placebo face of the device
rTMS of prefrontal or motor cortex
description:rTMS of the motor or prefrontal cortex (repetitive magnetic stimulation targeting the motor or prefrontal cortex) assisted with neuronavigation
rTMS prefrontal cortex (magventure)
Experimental : repetitive transcranial stimulation targeting the prefrontal cortex as indicated by neuronavigation
rTMS of prefrontal or motor cortex
description:rTMS of the motor or prefrontal cortex (repetitive magnetic stimulation targeting the motor or prefrontal cortex) assisted with neuronavigation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
rTMS of prefrontal or motor cortex
description:rTMS of the motor or prefrontal cortex (repetitive magnetic stimulation targeting the motor or prefrontal cortex) assisted with neuronavigation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnostic DN4 questionnaire score greater than or equal to 4/10 (Bouhassira et al 2005),
3. chronic pain, the average intensity is greater than or equal to 40/100
4. Daily or almost daily pain (at least 4 days out of 7)
5. This pain is present for more than 6 months
6. Patients over 18 and under 75 years old
7. Patients who signed informed consent,
8. Patients whose pain medication is stable for 15 days before inclusion, and will not need to be changed during the study period,
9. Patients who can be monitored during the study period (30 weeks)
10. Patients insured by a health insurance plan or entitled.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Work Accident or dispute
3. rTMS Cons-indications (ECT treatment during the previous month, epilepsy and / or a history of epilepsy; history of head trauma, neurosurgical lesion, intracranial hypertension, metal clip, pacemaker, pregnant or lactating women)
4. Abuse of drugs or psychoactive substances (DSM IV)
5. Central neuropathic pain,
6. Neuropathic pain within the framework of a progressive disease (HIV, cancer, non-stabilized system disease)
7. Neuropathic pain very limited extent, of neuroma type
8. Current major depression or psychosis according to DSM IV criteria,
9. Intermittent pain,
10. Pain for less than six months,
11. Presence of another pain more severe than the one justifying the inclusion
12. Lack of proper filling of self-assessment of pain from baseline and randomization (at least 4 weekly pain scores 7 days) notebooks
13. Lack of stability of pain scores on two successive evaluations, defined as a change of more than 30% between the two assessments of the average pain on the short questionnaire about pain between the first two visits inclusion
14. Subject unable to understand informed consent, under guardianship,
15. Subject who refuses to stop or can not stop prohibited treatment during the study,
16. Patients participating in another research protocol involving a drug within 30 days before enrollment.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
NADINE ATTAL, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pain evaluation and treatment center, CHU A Paré, 92104 Boulogne Billancourt, France
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pain evaluation and treatement center, CHU Ambroise Paré
Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Attal N, Branders S, Pereira A, Bouhassira D. Prediction of the response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in peripheral neuropathic pain and validation of a new algorithm. Pain. 2025 Jan 1;166(1):34-41. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003297. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
Attal N, Poindessous-Jazat F, De Chauvigny E, Quesada C, Mhalla A, Ayache SS, Fermanian C, Nizard J, Peyron R, Lefaucheur JP, Bouhassira D. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropathic pain: a randomized multicentre sham-controlled trial. Brain. 2021 Dec 16;144(11):3328-3339. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab208.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AOM 120141
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
P120126
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.