Efficacy of Home-delivered Transcranial Direct Electrical Stimulation or Chronic Pain

NCT ID: NCT07211256

Last Updated: 2025-10-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-09

Study Completion Date

2028-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical investigation aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a home-based device providing electrical stimulation of the brain named transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS ) , in patients with chronic pain who have been transiently relieved by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered at hospital (less than one month benefit). The general objective is to show that these patients may best benefit from home based tDCS while rTMS performed in hospital has only limited and transient efficacy. Each participant will be randomized into one of two arms to receive during 3 months either active tDCS or sham tDCS. Neither the investigator nor the patient will be aware of the treatment. The efficacy will be assessed on pain intensity (primary outcome at 3 months) and several secondary outcomes (qualify of life, pain symptoms , global impression of change, pain relief, sleep, anxiety, depression) every month for up to 3 months. Safety will be assessed at each follow up visit for up to 3 months. The participants will be asked to self stimulate themselves with the device 5 days per week for about 20 minutes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, bi-centric study versus placebo stimulation. Patients undergoing previous treatment with rTMS of the motor cortex in routine in our pain center and with at least 30 % pain relief with rTMS (after 10 sessions) but only transient pain relief (less than one month) will stop their treatment for at least one month. They will then be randomised to receive one of the 2 treatments under study (active tDCS of the motor cortex, placebo tDCS of the motor cortex, TENS eco plus). The protocol will involve a 20-minute tDCS session (2 mA) at home, 5 days a week for 12 weeks. The treatment will continue for 12 weeks and the final evaluation will take place at 12 weeks.

TENS ECO PLUS is a portable transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) system (tDCS kit) supplied by the Monath Electronic laboratory, designed for use at home; this system will first be tested in hospital during a test session with explanations to the patient on how to use it. The stimulation intensity is blocked above a certain threshold by the system to avoid any risk of epileptic seizure. Sham or placebo stimulation uses the same medical device without active stimulation.

Given the exploratory nature of the trial and in order to reduce study participant's exposure to a potentially useless treatment, blinded interim analysis will be conducted dring the course of the trial in the first 40 enrolled patients and the study will be stopped early if this analysis suggests large differences between the two treatment groups or conversely shows obvious futility.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuropathic Pain Nociplastic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active tDCS

Active tDCS of the motor cortex

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tDCS of the motor cortex

Intervention Type DEVICE

Home-delivered tDCS device

Sham tDCS

Sham tDCS of the motor cortex

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

tDCS of the motor cortex

Intervention Type DEVICE

Home-delivered tDCS device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tDCS of the motor cortex

Home-delivered tDCS device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Chronic pain for at least 6 months Pain intensity ≥ 4/10 on 0-10 NRS Pain present every day or nearly every day Neuropathic pain (DN4 score ≥ 4/10) or nociplastic pain (Kosek et al Pain 2021) Patients previously treated with rTMS of the motor cortex in routine in our pain center but with only transient efficacy (ie, efficacy for less than one month, defined as pain intensity improved by at least 30 %) Affilitated to social security

Exclusion Criteria

Contraindications to tDCS as stated in the manufacturer brochure (ie, implantable device , severe cognitive disorders, epilepsia, skin problems where will placed the electrodes, arterial or venous thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, metallic intracranial implant, cranioth-omy, incracranial aneuvrysm, cerebral tumor, severel sleep disorders such as narcolepsia) Conciomitant treatment which might increase the risk of epilepsia such as high doses opioids (≥ 140 mg morphine equivalent) or high. doses tricyclic antidepressants (≥ 150 mg per day) Pregnancy or lactation Age below 18 or \> 80 years Pending litigation related to pain Pain more severe than neuropathic or nociplastic pain requiring treatment Severe disease such as cancer Severe psychiatric condition (psychosis) Impossible to be followed for up to 3 months Participation in a recent protocol (less than 3 months) Psychoactive drug abuse
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nadine ATTAL

Coordinator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nadine ATTAL, MD PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, INSERM U 987

Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts de Seine, France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nadine ATTAL, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

0033149095931

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nadine Pr ATTAL, MD PhD

Role: primary

0033149095931

Didier Bouhassira, MD, PhD

Role: backup

0033149094556

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-A02797-38

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.