TMS-EEG as a Tool to Study the Neuromodulatory Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation

NCT ID: NCT05206162

Last Updated: 2022-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-02

Study Completion Date

2017-11-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the effect of continuous (cTBS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) stimulation on motor cortex excitability using TMS-EEG. Based on prior literature, the investigators hypothesized that N100 amplitude would be differently modulated by these two modalities.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Each participant underwent three experimental sessions, at least one week apart in a cross-over design, assessing the effects of a single TBS train over the motor cortex on TMS-evoked potentials measured at the same location and resting-state EEG, immediately before and after the intervention. At each session a different type of TBS was applied (cTBS, iTBS or sham) in a randomized sequence. Subjects were uninformed about the expected effects of each intervention. Sham stimulation was achieved by adding a plastic spacer (25mm thickness) between coil and scalp, preventing effective cortical stimulation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cortical Excitability

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

three experimental sessions at randomized order, at least one week apart, in a cross-over design
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

continuous theta burst stimulation

cTBS over the left motor hotspot, delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold (RMT), according to the Huang et al. protocol, consisting of bursts of stimuli that are presented every 200ms (5Hz), with bursts consisting of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz. A total of 600 pulses are delivered in a continuous train of 40s.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

theta burst stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

TBS over the left motor hotspot, delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold (RMT), according to the Huang et al. protocol, consisting of bursts of stimuli that are presented every 200ms (5Hz), with bursts consisting of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz. A total of 600 pulses are delivered.

intermittent theta burst stimulation

iTBS over the left motor hotspot, delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold (RMT), according to the Huang et al. protocol, consisting of bursts of stimuli that are presented every 200ms (5Hz), with bursts consisting of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz. A total of 600 pulses are delivered in an intermittent train of 190s for iTBS, with repeated cycles of 2s stimulation and 8s pause.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

theta burst stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

TBS over the left motor hotspot, delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold (RMT), according to the Huang et al. protocol, consisting of bursts of stimuli that are presented every 200ms (5Hz), with bursts consisting of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz. A total of 600 pulses are delivered.

sham stimulation

Sham stimulation over the left motor hotspot, delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold (RMT), according to the Huang et al. protocol, consisting of bursts of stimuli that are presented every 200ms (5Hz), with bursts consisting of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz. A total of 600 pulses are delivered in a continuous train of 40s using a plastic spacer (25mm thickness) between coil and scalp, preventing effective cortical stimulation.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

theta burst stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

TBS over the left motor hotspot, delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold (RMT), according to the Huang et al. protocol, consisting of bursts of stimuli that are presented every 200ms (5Hz), with bursts consisting of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz. A total of 600 pulses are delivered.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

theta burst stimulation

TBS over the left motor hotspot, delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold (RMT), according to the Huang et al. protocol, consisting of bursts of stimuli that are presented every 200ms (5Hz), with bursts consisting of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz. A total of 600 pulses are delivered.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-65 years
* Male
* Right handed subjects
* IQ \> 70
* Healthy participants, as determined by history, clinical investigation and investigator's judgment
* No history of central nervous system condition
* No chronic intake of neurotropic drugs
* TMS Safety Screening questionnaire and informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy, short-term birth wish or childbearing age without adequate birth control
* Intracranial metal hardware (excluding dental filling): surgical clips, shrapnell, electrodes under the stimulation area
* Presence of pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), permanent medication pumps, cochlear implants or deep brain stimulation (DBS)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Dr. Kristl Vonck

Prof. Dr. Boon

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Ghent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Carrette S, Vonck K, Klooster D, Raedt R, Carrette E, Delbeke J, Wadman W, Casarotto S, Massimini M, Boon P. Exploration of Theta Burst-Induced Modulation of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Evoked Potentials Over the Motor Cortex. Neuromodulation. 2025 Jan;28(1):123-135. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.04.007. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38842956 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC/2017/0780

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neuronavigated TBS in Depression
NCT03953521 TERMINATED NA
TMS With Real-time E-field and EEG Source Imaging
NCT06645613 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA