Resting State Changes Following Theta Burst Stimulation

NCT ID: NCT05322239

Last Updated: 2024-12-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-17

Study Completion Date

2027-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly being applied to effectively treat mental illness, however efforts to quantify the effects of TMS on the network architecture of the brain have largely been limited in scope and tied to specific neurologic and psychiatric disorders. The objective of the current work is to build and validate a whole-brain, domain-general model of brain connectivity changes following TMS, based on physical models of the current distribution at the cortex. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: This work is relevant to public health because it will provide direct evidence that brain connectivity changes following neuromodulatory TMS vary as a function of the current density at the cortex, which can be used to predict psychiatric symptom change following neuromodulatory TMS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, and smoking cessation. Despite evidence that TMS improves symptoms by modulating brain connectivity, the few published studies that have measured brain connectivity before and after neuromodulatory TMS have been population-, dose-, and pattern-specific, with connectivity effects that are limited in scope to a handful a priori regions of interest. Accordingly, there is a critical need for generalized, comprehensive model that explains how functional brain connectivity changes at the whole-brain level following neuromodulatory TMS. Therefore, the objectives of this grant are to 1) develop a model using whole-brain estimates of the TMS-induced electric (e)-field to predict changes in resting state functional connectivity following neuromodulatory TMS, and 2) validate this model in a large cohort of healthy volunteers receiving multiple doses of either intermittent or continuous theta burst stimulation (iTBS and cTBS, respectively). Our central hypothesis is that changes in functional connectivity will vary systematically with the current density at the cortex, operationally defined using e-field modelling. Investigators have pilot data suggesting that the variability in pre-post rsFC changes following TMS can be predicted using estimates of the current density at the cortex with a medium to large effect size. Our approach will be to measure rsFC in healthy volunteers before and after each of 3 doses (5 sessions/dose; 600 pulses/session) of iTBS or cTBS. Stimulation will be delivered to the left dlPFC, and targeting will be individualized based on fMRI data collected during the Sternberg working memory paradigm. Our primary outcome measure will be the percent of variability in pre-post rsFC accounted for by our model. Our rationale for this approach is that by collecting resting state data pre and post these doses of iTBS and cTBS, investigators will be able to quantify the effect of pattern (i.e. cTBS vs. iTBS) and dose (i.e. number of pulses) on functional connectivity changes. This work is innovative because it uses a novel application of e-field modelling to predict changes in rsFC data following TMS administration. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: This work is relevant to public health because it will provide direct evidence that functional connectivity changes following neuromodulatory TMS vary as a function of the current density at the cortex. The empirical support for this model gained from this current work will set the stage for the use of this model for individualized targeting in subsequent clinical trials. Importantly, because of the domain-general nature of this approach its application is not limited to any specific disorder. Likewise, because our approach is not tied to any specific functional connectivity feature, it can be applied to regions outside those currently under investigation, which could facilitate target discovery in understudied disorders.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Connectivity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Therefore, the proposed approach will be to measure the cumulative effect of TBS on resting state functional connectivity in healthy volunteers before and 24 hours after each of 3 identical doses (5 sessions/dose; 600 pulses/session) of cTBS or iTBS. Stimulation will be delivered to the left dlPFC; targeting will be individualized based on fMRI data collected during the Sternberg Working Memory (WM) paradigm.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

TBS. A Magventure MagPro 100X stimulator with a B65 figure-8 coil will be used for the TBS sessions. On each of the 3 stimulation days, 5 iTBS sessions will be administered at 30 min intervals.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

iTBS parameters. A series of 20, 10 s trains will be presented over the course of the \~3.5 min session. Each train will consist of 2 s of stimulation with an 8 s ITI. During the 2 s of stimulation, 10, 50 Hz bursts will be repeated at intervals of 200 ms (5 Hz).

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation

TBS. A Magventure MagPro 100X stimulator with a B65 figure-8 coil will be used for the TBS sessions. On each of the 3 stimulation days, 5 cTBS sessions will be administered at 30 min intervals.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

cTBS parameters. A single 600 pulse cTBS train will be delivered during each stimulation session. The train will consist of 50 Hz bursts, repeated at intervals of 200 ms (5 Hz) for 40 sec.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

iTBS parameters. A series of 20, 10 s trains will be presented over the course of the \~3.5 min session. Each train will consist of 2 s of stimulation with an 8 s ITI. During the 2 s of stimulation, 10, 50 Hz bursts will be repeated at intervals of 200 ms (5 Hz).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation

cTBS parameters. A single 600 pulse cTBS train will be delivered during each stimulation session. The train will consist of 50 Hz bursts, repeated at intervals of 200 ms (5 Hz) for 40 sec.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Able to give their consent
* Right-handed

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-english speaking
* Any significant medical problems
* Current or past Axis I psychiatric disorder(s),
* Active or history of active suicidal ideation
* Alcohol/drug problems in the past year or lifetime alcohol or drug dependence
* Medications that act on the central nervous system
* History of seizure
* History of epilepsy or other neurological problems
* Increased risk of seizure for any reason
* Pregnancy
* Any medical condition that increases risk for fMRI or TMS
* Any metal in their body which would make having an MRI scan unsafe
* Any sort of medical implants
* Claustrophobia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nicholas Balderston, PhD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicholas Balderston, PhD

Research Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicholas L Balderston

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pennsylvania

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nicholas L Balderston

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 2157463058

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nicholas l Balderston, PhD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Balderston NL, Beer JC, Seok D, Makhoul W, Deng ZD, Girelli T, Teferi M, Smyk N, Jaskir M, Oathes DJ, Sheline YI. Proof of concept study to develop a novel connectivity-based electric-field modelling approach for individualized targeting of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jan;47(2):588-598. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01110-6. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34321597 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

851028

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id