Neuromodulation and Attention Deficits in MDD

NCT ID: NCT07111169

Last Updated: 2025-08-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2028-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Multimodal study (Behavior, TMS, EEG) combining a sham-controlled intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) intervention with an additional-singleton task and EEG to evaluate whether left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation enhances cognitive control and modulates maladaptive attention processes in MDD and whether the effects are influenced by neuronavigated versus manual (Beam F3 method) localization of the stimulation site.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is associated with impaired selective attention and disrupted top-down control, yet the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. The present double-blind, sham-controlled trial will test whether iTBS over the left DLPFC, an FDA-approved rTMS site, can restore top-down distractor suppression in MDD (active-iTBS: n = 30; sham-iTBS: n = 30). Neuronavigated iTBS will be delivered across sessions, and effects will be assessed on the behavioral level (additional singleton paradigm) and the neurophysiological level (using concomitant EEG). Key aim of the project is to compare neuronavigated (active-iTBS) versus manual (Beam F3 method, sham-iTBS group) localization of the stimulation site.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depression Disorder Cognitive Deficits Selective Attention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Participants did not know whether they were receiving iTBS or sham; Intervention Operator knew whether the participants were receiving iTBS or sham; and Outcomes Assessor who evaluated HAMD/HAMA and analyzed the scale data did not know which group each MDD participant was assigned to.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MDD subjects in the active group undergo 10 days of MRI-guided iTBS intervention

Neuronavigation procedure: During the iTBS treatment, the high-resolution T1-weighted scans of each subject will be uploaded to the BrainSight neuronavigation system (version 2.4.11), adjusted, and remodelled into a three-dimensional model. Then, the neuronavigation system is calibrated and validated on the subject. Next, we localized each participant's left-lateral dlPFC stimulation target using Talairach coordinates (-45, 45, 35). The head position is standardized using the nasal tip, sinuses, and bilateral ear screens as baseline markers, and the location of the target on the scalp is identified in each participant's natural space anatomical image. In the end, we observe on the computer screen whether the coil position is placed above the target through the navigation software and artificially control the coil to be tangent to the skull, with the center of the figure-of-eight coil always directly above the target.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) intervention

Intervention Type DEVICE

iTBS protocol: Intervention with an 80-120% resting threshold was used. In the active group, the left dlPFC was selected as the stimulation site and a stimulation protocol with iTBS parameters was given. This was a neuro-modulation protocol of excitatory sequences, with theta burst stimulation at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 Hz, stimulation for 2 s with an interval of 8 s, for a total of 1,800 pulses, with a treatment time of about 20 min/session, two sessions per day, with a15-30 min rest between sessions, and five consecutive days of treatment per week, with a rest of 2 days, and two weeks of treatment.

MDD controls in the sham-iTBS group receive the same intervention but Beam F3 site.

Target Localization and Cap Placement Procedure: The stimulation target was the EEG 10-20 coordinate F3, corresponding to the probabilistic location of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We localized this site using the Beam F3 method and a TMS elastic cap (patent no. 201120150878.5, Wuhan YIRUIDE Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.), and verified it with the F3 electrode on the standard EEG cap. Before the first session, the elastic cap was aligned using anatomical landmarks (nasion, inion, and ears), and the F3 position was marked for consistent coil placement. This standardized approach ensured precise and repeatable targeting across TMS sessions.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) intervention

Intervention Type DEVICE

iTBS protocol: Intervention with an 80-120% resting threshold was used. In the active group, the left dlPFC was selected as the stimulation site and a stimulation protocol with iTBS parameters was given. This was a neuro-modulation protocol of excitatory sequences, with theta burst stimulation at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 Hz, stimulation for 2 s with an interval of 8 s, for a total of 1,800 pulses, with a treatment time of about 20 min/session, two sessions per day, with a15-30 min rest between sessions, and five consecutive days of treatment per week, with a rest of 2 days, and two weeks of treatment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) intervention

iTBS protocol: Intervention with an 80-120% resting threshold was used. In the active group, the left dlPFC was selected as the stimulation site and a stimulation protocol with iTBS parameters was given. This was a neuro-modulation protocol of excitatory sequences, with theta burst stimulation at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 Hz, stimulation for 2 s with an interval of 8 s, for a total of 1,800 pulses, with a treatment time of about 20 min/session, two sessions per day, with a15-30 min rest between sessions, and five consecutive days of treatment per week, with a rest of 2 days, and two weeks of treatment.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-55 years
* Right-handed
* Normal or corrected normal visual acuity
* MDD: meet the proposed DSM-5 MDD criteria, unmedicated or stable medicated within the last one month. Healthy subjects without any past or present psychiatric or neurological disorders.

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of other severe mental disorders, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, neurodevelopmental disorder, etc.
* high suicidal risk
* Unnormal intellectual functioning, auditory impairments,
* Have received neuromodulation, such as Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy (MECT), or any psychotherapy within the past 6 months.
* Only for the active-iTBS group: have a contraindication to MRI scanning (e.g., metal implants, claustrophobia or other conditions that make them inappropriate for MRI scanning).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Benjamin Becker

Beckerlab

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, Chengdu Fourth People's Hospital, Jiujiang Branch (Chengdu Mental Health Center)

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nan Qiu, PhD

Role: primary

86 18380456153

Lan Hu, PhD

Role: backup

86 02887038120

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BAM_lab_MDD_01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.