Mechanism of Analgesic Effect on Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation

NCT ID: NCT05360030

Last Updated: 2023-02-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-14

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It has been shown that prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (pcTBS) , a relatively new repetitive transcranial magnetic simulation (rTMS) protocol, of the primary motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) decreases pain in healthy volunteers, in various experimental models. In addition, rTMS of M1 has also been shown to have analgesic effects in various chronic pain conditions, including neuropathic pain.The mechanisms underlying rTMS-induced analgesia remain unclear. Functional neuroimaging studies have shown that rTMS of M1 and DLPFC induces changes in the activity of cortical and subcortical structures involved in pain processing and modulation. Endogenous opioids and e N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor are known to play a major role in these processes. The investigator hypothesized that the endogenous opioids systems (EOS) and NMDA receptor might be involved in the analgesic action of pcTBS. In the first part,the investigator compares the analgesic effects of motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation before and after naloxone or placebo treatment, the intensity of pain induced by capsaicin were used to evaluate the analgesic effects of pcTBS. If naloxone does not reverse the analgesic effect of pcTBS,The volunteers will be invited to participant the second part of the study, which the investigator compares the analgesic effects of motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation before and after Ketamine treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study comprised 3 parallel arms corresponding to 3 types of stimulation: active stimulation of M1, active stimulation of DLPFC-pcTBS, and sham stimulation (of M1 or DLPFC). Volunteers were randomly assigned to the 3 arms. In the first part, these volunteers participated in 2 experimental sessions 1 weeks apart, in which we compared the effects of naloxone and placebo (saline), administered according to a randomized, double-blind crossover design, on pcTBS-induced analgesia. Each experimental session started with the determination of baseline pain intensity and cortical excitability as well as plasma opioid peptide concentrations. Ten minutes before pcTBS (of M1, DLPFC, or sham), the volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of either placebo (ie, saline) or naloxone, which was continued throughout the rTMS session (2 minutes). The participant was then allowed to rest for 60 minutes. Posttreatment pain intensity, cortical excitability and plasma opioid peptide concentrations will be determined by the same procedure used at baseline.In the second part, ketamine will be delivered the same as the first part.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain rTMS

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

active stimulation of M1

pcTBS was administered to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Naloxone

Intervention Type DRUG

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of naloxone, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of placebo (saline), which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

Ketamine Hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

pcTBS of M1

Intervention Type DEVICE

Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left M1 at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline

active stimulation of DLPFC

pcTBS was administered to the left DLPFC at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Naloxone

Intervention Type DRUG

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of naloxone, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of placebo (saline), which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

Ketamine Hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

pcTBS of DLPFC

Intervention Type DEVICE

Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left DLPFC at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline

SHAM stimulation

The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same protocol, with the coil being orientated at 90° to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scal

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Naloxone

Intervention Type DRUG

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of naloxone, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of placebo (saline), which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

Ketamine Hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

SHAM stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same pcTBS protocol, with the coil being flipped 90◦to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scalp

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Naloxone

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of naloxone, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of placebo (saline), which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

Intervention Type DRUG

Ketamine Hydrochloride

The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session

Intervention Type DRUG

pcTBS of M1

Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left M1 at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline

Intervention Type DEVICE

pcTBS of DLPFC

Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left DLPFC at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline

Intervention Type DEVICE

SHAM stimulation

The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same pcTBS protocol, with the coil being flipped 90◦to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scalp

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1)woman or man over 18 and under 85 years old; 2)Clinical diagnosis of physical and mental health people; 3) able to cooperate in completing questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria

1)Clinical diagnosis of psychiatric disorder including major depression; 2) History of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs); 3) Past treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); 4) Contraindications to rTMS (previous severe head trauma or neurosurgical intervention, past or current epilepsy, active brain tumor, intracranial hypertension, implanted ferromagnetic devices, e.g., cardiac pacemaker, neurostimulator, or cochlear implants); 5) Any difficulty to fill out questionnaires (due to language or cognitive problems);
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

min yan, prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Liu Y, Sun J, Wu C, Ren J, He Y, Sun N, Huang H, Chen Q, Liu D, Huang Y, Xu F, Yu L, Fitzgibbon BM, Cash RFH, Fitzgerald PB, Yan M, Che X. Characterizing the opioidergic mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2024 Sep 1;165(9):2035-2043. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003220. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38537053 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RI2022089

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain and Major Depressive Disorder
NCT04556890 RECRUITING NA