Accelerated High-dose Sequential Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression
NCT ID: NCT05811104
Last Updated: 2023-04-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-05-20
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long-term Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depression
NCT01153139
Comparing the Efficacy of Accelerated vs. Standard fMRI-guided iTBS in Treating Adolescents Depression
NCT06528938
Accelerated Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Ameliorate Major Depressive Disorder by Regulating CAMKII Pathway
NCT05913960
Pilot Study Comparing 10hz vs Theta Burst Stimulation
NCT02800226
Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation for Major Depression: an Intensity-response Study
NCT06392867
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Studies suggest that the efficacy of TBS could be enhanced and expedited by accelerated protocols (more than once daily sessions ranging from 2-10 sessions/day) higher doses of stimulation (\>600 TBS pulses up to 3600 pulses per session) with shorter duration of treatment (4-10days). Recently, an accelerated Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy protocol (10 sessions of iTBS a day for 5 days) with high dose stimulation (90,000 pulses in total) was found to be more effective than sham for severe TRD. This protocol yielded robust results with 69.2% response rates compared to 13% in sham during the 4-week outcome period .
The main goal of this project is to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of accelerated high dose bilateral TBS treatment for TRD in comparison to sham stimulation using a randomized double blind clinical trial design. The second objective is to examine the durability of antidepressant effect of this treatment protocol. Our initial open label study of accelerated high dose bilateral TBS demonstrated efficacy in a small cohort of participants with TRD. This proposed study builds on our initial findings whether the antidepressant efficacy of accelerated high dose bilateral TBS would be significantly greater than an identical schedule of sham stimulation. This pilot study will help to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of treatment protocol, and estimate the sample size for the next pivotal trial. Hypotheses: Accounting this is a pilot study using small sample size without power size calculations, it is not designed for hypothesis testing. However, it is predicted that the accelerated bilateral TBS would be clinically effective and safe in the treatment of patients with TRD compared to sham stimulation. Additionally, it is anticipated that the antidepressant effects of this treatment may be durable.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active stimulation
Bilateral real TBS
Sequential bilateral theta burst stimulation
Three sessions of active or sham bilateral TBS will be delivered daily for 10 days in 2 weeks (no session on weekend) with a total of 30 sessions for each patient. Daily low intensity (90% resting motor threshold) bilateral sequential continousTBS ( cTBI) will be applied first on the right DLPFC (1800 pulses) and then intermittent TBS (iTBS)on the left DLPFC (1800 pulses) with an intersession interval of 60 minutes. We will adopt 1800 pulse per session based on the previous studies. Patients will receive a stimulation of 3600 pulses a session, 10,800 pulses a day and 108,000 pulses in total. After the study, sham group will receive active stimulation following the same protocol
Sham stimulation
Bilateral Sham stimulation
Sequential bilateral theta burst stimulation
Three sessions of active or sham bilateral TBS will be delivered daily for 10 days in 2 weeks (no session on weekend) with a total of 30 sessions for each patient. Daily low intensity (90% resting motor threshold) bilateral sequential continousTBS ( cTBI) will be applied first on the right DLPFC (1800 pulses) and then intermittent TBS (iTBS)on the left DLPFC (1800 pulses) with an intersession interval of 60 minutes. We will adopt 1800 pulse per session based on the previous studies. Patients will receive a stimulation of 3600 pulses a session, 10,800 pulses a day and 108,000 pulses in total. After the study, sham group will receive active stimulation following the same protocol
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sequential bilateral theta burst stimulation
Three sessions of active or sham bilateral TBS will be delivered daily for 10 days in 2 weeks (no session on weekend) with a total of 30 sessions for each patient. Daily low intensity (90% resting motor threshold) bilateral sequential continousTBS ( cTBI) will be applied first on the right DLPFC (1800 pulses) and then intermittent TBS (iTBS)on the left DLPFC (1800 pulses) with an intersession interval of 60 minutes. We will adopt 1800 pulse per session based on the previous studies. Patients will receive a stimulation of 3600 pulses a session, 10,800 pulses a day and 108,000 pulses in total. After the study, sham group will receive active stimulation following the same protocol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adults in the age range of 18 - 65
* Both sex
* HAMD-17 score of ≥20
* TRD - failure to two antidepressant trial Stage II (Thase and Rush classification)
Exclusion Criteria
* Obsessive compulsive disorder,
* Psychosis
* Bipolar disorder,
* substance abuse disorder,
* autistic spectrum disorder,
* active suicidal behavior
* Epilepsy
* Dementia,
* Movement disorders
* severe head injury
* Brain metallic implants, cardiac pacemakers
* Pregnancy .
* Non-response to prior rTMS, Electroconvulsive treatment, Vagal nerve or Deep brain stimulation or a history of psychosurgery.
* Borderline personality disorder,
* Schizotypal, schizoid \& paranoid personality disorder
* Current treatment with anticonvulsants or benzodiazepines
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rajamannar Ramasubbu
Professor (Clinical)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rajamannar Ramasubbu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lisanby SH, Husain MM, Rosenquist PB, Maixner D, Gutierrez R, Krystal A, Gilmer W, Marangell LB, Aaronson S, Daskalakis ZJ, Canterbury R, Richelson E, Sackeim HA, George MS. Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: clinical predictors of outcome in a multisite, randomized controlled clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Jan;34(2):522-34. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.118. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
Thomas L, Kessler D, Campbell J, Morrison J, Peters TJ, Williams C, Lewis G, Wiles N. Prevalence of treatment-resistant depression in primary care: cross-sectional data. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Dec;63(617):e852-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675430.
Levkovitz Y, Isserles M, Padberg F, Lisanby SH, Bystritsky A, Xia G, Tendler A, Daskalakis ZJ, Winston JL, Dannon P, Hafez HM, Reti IM, Morales OG, Schlaepfer TE, Hollander E, Berman JA, Husain MM, Sofer U, Stein A, Adler S, Deutsch L, Deutsch F, Roth Y, George MS, Zangen A. Efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;14(1):64-73. doi: 10.1002/wps.20199.
Blumberger DM, Vila-Rodriguez F, Thorpe KE, Feffer K, Noda Y, Giacobbe P, Knyahnytska Y, Kennedy SH, Lam RW, Daskalakis ZJ, Downar J. Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1683-1692. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30295-2. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
Cole EJ, Phillips AL, Bentzley BS, Stimpson KH, Nejad R, Barmak F, Veerapal C, Khan N, Cherian K, Felber E, Brown R, Choi E, King S, Pankow H, Bishop JH, Azeez A, Coetzee J, Rapier R, Odenwald N, Carreon D, Hawkins J, Chang M, Keller J, Raj K, DeBattista C, Jo B, Espil FM, Schatzberg AF, Sudheimer KD, Williams NR. Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;179(2):132-141. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Voigt JD, Leuchter AF, Carpenter LL. Theta burst stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry. 2021 May 28;11(1):330. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01441-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10021798
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.