Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-20
2027-01-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intensive TMS for Bipolar Depression
NCT05228457
Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Depressed Patients During the Covid-19 Pandemic
NCT04935489
Pilot Study Comparing 10hz vs Theta Burst Stimulation
NCT02800226
Mini Theta Burst TMS in MDD Patients
NCT04014959
Neural Mechanisms of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in the Core Depression Network
NCT05224206
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Another technique for improving treatment efficacy, shown to modulate cortical excitability, may be the application of intermittent theta-burst stimulation in regular intervals, which has been shown to be no different than a longer-in-time application of rTMS. Paired with the evidence that iTBS has produced significant antidepressant responses in severely depressed individuals, and that relapse in depressive states predicts diminished efficacy of treatment as well as increased quantity of TBS pulses to have a beneficial effect, these recent iTBS findings suggest that iTBS may offer a valid treatment alternative to options that have proven otherwise ineffective in treating TRD. Therefore, the investigators aim to administer iTBS to severely-depressed participant in a shorter amount of time, in order to improve their antidepressant outcome.
Significance: This protocol builds on different notions:
1. iTBS is not different in treatment outcome than rTMS while applying the same amount of pulses in shorter amount of time;
2. The degree of treatment resistance is indicative of iTBS quantity needed to obtain an antidepressant treatment
3. Repeated iTBS produces a significant effect in treating refractory depression
4. Decreasing the interval between iTBS applications enhanced positive treatment outcomes.
Therefore, the compression of iTBS pulses with shorter intervals between sessions is hypothesized to have an increased beneficial effect on individuals affected by treatment-resistant depression.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Compressed iTBS schedule
Stimulation 3-pulse 50-Hz bursts at 5-Hz for 2-s trains, with trains every 10 s, for 10 minutes, 10 times a day, for 5 consecutive days.
intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
The present study will utilize TMS dosage of iTBS of 18 000 pulses a day for 5 consecutive days.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
The present study will utilize TMS dosage of iTBS of 18 000 pulses a day for 5 consecutive days.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18 - 70 years of age
* Meets Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for primary diagnosis of MDD
* Patients must be fluent in English
* Participants must have the ability to provide consent
* Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale score ≥20
* Failed 2+ prior treatments (treatment-refractory)
* May be on current anti-depressant medication at the discretion of PI, if not exceeding doses that would make TMS an increased risk
Exclusion Criteria
* MRI contraindication
* Medical condition that interferes with the collection or interpretation of MRI data
* Implanted devices such as: aneurysm clip or cardiac pacemaker
* Diagnosis of stroke, epilepsy, or other neurological disorders interfering with treatment at PI discretion
* Any factor the investigator believe may affect participant safety or compliance (ex: ≥100 miles from clinic)
* Current alcohol or substance use disorder in last 3 months
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yvette Sheline
Director, Center for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress (CNDS)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yvette Sheline, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Interventional Psychiatry, University of California San Diego
La Jolla, California, United States
Center for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
834723
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.