Efficacy of rTMS Treatment After Spinal Cord Injury

NCT ID: NCT06464744

Last Updated: 2024-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-15

Study Completion Date

2029-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is accumulating evidence that neuromodulation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex holds promise as a treatment for rehabilitation of motor function following a spinal cord injury. This study is designed to assess the clinical potential of non-invasive stimulation of the primary motor cortex to improve motor functions.The results will help to evaluate the clinical relevance of motor cortex stimulation for motor functions in patients with spinal cord injury. The outcomes of this study could potentially support the initiation of a larger clinical trial and the development of a new routine treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators will recruit 20 patients with low cervical or thoracic ASIA C or D spinal cord injuries based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients will be randomized into 2 groups. Each group will receive either the theta burst stimulation or the placebo stimulation. rTMS will be delivered using a figure-of-eight coil positioned on the patient's head, targeting the leg area of the primary motor cortex. After the motor threshold (MT) is determined patients will receive a unilateral 90% subthreshold theta burst stimulation for 3 minutes The protocol includes 15 stimulation sessions over a 3-week period. The 12-week follow up consist of a series of electrophysiological and functional tests to assess upper and lower limb function bilaterally. Secondary outcomes include pain using the NRS scale, and self-reported evaluation of autonomic functions before, during, and after the treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries Myelopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Active motor cortex stimulation
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Placebo motor cortex stimulation

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo stimulation

Patients will receive stimulation from a placebo coil that only delivers skin tingling but no active brain stimulation.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo stimulation using a placebo coil

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The placebo coil looks identical to the active coil but it only delivers skin tingling and no active brain stimulation.

Active stimulation

Patients will receive active brain stimulation from a magnetic figure-of-eight-coil.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intermittent Theta burst stimulation will be delivered on the on the primary motor cortex using a figure-of-eight coil, supported by neuronavigation. The stimulation intensity will be set to 90% of the motor threshold

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Intermittent Theta burst stimulation will be delivered on the on the primary motor cortex using a figure-of-eight coil, supported by neuronavigation. The stimulation intensity will be set to 90% of the motor threshold

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placebo stimulation using a placebo coil

The placebo coil looks identical to the active coil but it only delivers skin tingling and no active brain stimulation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age over 18 years and less than 80 years
* Chronic patients with an incomplete cervical and/or thoracic spinal cord injury (traumatic and non-traumatic) affecting upper and/or lower extremities (i.e., C4-T12 and classified as ASIA C or D) (Figure 138).
* Capable and willing to provide informed consent and able to adhere to the treatment schedule
* Patients who can be followed for the whole duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication to rTMS:

* past severe head trauma
* history of epilepsy or ongoing epilepsy
* active cerebral tumor
* intracranial hypertension
* implanted ferromagnetic devices such as cardiac pacemaker and neurostimulator and cochlear implants
* pregnancy or lactation.
* Any clinically significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorder
* Other ongoing research protocol or recent past protocol within two months before the inclusion
* History of treatment with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)
* Subjects protected by law (guardianship or tutelage measure)
* History of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs)
* Pending litigation
* Impossibility to understand the protocol or to fill out the forms
* Chronic use of sedative medication
* Participation in another clinical trial evaluating spinal cord injury
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mark Züchner

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth, MD,PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Oslo University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mark Züchner, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+47 23070000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mark Züchner, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+4723070000

Jean-Luc Boulland, Assoc. Prof.

Role: backup

+4722851081

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

635283

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dosing rTMS for Depression Post-SCI
NCT05553353 RECRUITING NA
rTMS for Neuroenhancement
NCT06214871 RECRUITING NA
Treatment of Depression Post-SCI
NCT04263285 RECRUITING NA