Development of a Web-based Multicenter Registry on the Use of oXiris Membrane for EBPTs in Critically Ill Patients

NCT ID: NCT03807414

Last Updated: 2025-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

270 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-28

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The use of extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT) is becoming increasingly widespread worldwide in everyday clinical practice, particularly in the critical care setting. Nonetheless, most of the clinical trials aimed at exploring the effect of EBPT on patients' long-term outcomes have failed to demonstrate consistent results regarding 28 day- or hospital- mortality rates. The aim of this observational prospective registry is to evaluate if there is a cluster of critically ill patients that mostly benefits from extracorporeal blood purification therapies with oXiris membrane.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT) is becoming increasingly widespread worldwide in everyday clinical practice, particularly in the critical care setting. For most of these treatments, the extracorporeal removal of inflammatory mediators (via enhanced transmembrane clearance and/or selective/un-selective adsorption of bacterial toxins or inflammatory mediators) is already well established in the literature. Unselective cytokine removal is the main rationale for the use of EBPT, and it might explain the effect of these treatments on multiorgan dysfunction in critically ill patients. Indeed, an increment in hemodynamic stability and an improvement in the multiorgan dysfunction scoring system of treated patients are consistently observed in most of the studies available in the literature. Nonetheless, most of the clinical trials aimed at exploring the effect of EBPT on patients' long-term outcomes have failed to demonstrate consistent results regarding 28 day- or hospital- mortality rates.

Interestingly, the post-hoc analysis of large databases suggests that a specific subpopulation of patients, who are likely to benefit more than others from EBPT, could be identified in clinical practice. As an example, press releases from the Euphrates trial suggest that a specific range of baseline endotoxin activity assay might correlate with a positive long-term outcome in patients treated with Toraymixin cartridges. Nowadays, a personalized approach to extracorporeal therapy has been advocated as the only strategy capable of maximizing the clinical effect of EBPT and their impact on patient outcomes (i.e. precision medicine).

The identification of clinical characteristics correlated with positive outcomes during EBPT allows the implementation of specifically designed trials, focused on a well-defined cluster of patients.

The implementation of a large database encompassing the clinical/biochemical characteristics of patients undergoing EBPT is thus widely hoped for to enable the identification of a cluster of patients with specific features who most benefit from these treatments.

Although it is well known that only a clinical trial can formally assess the effect of EBPT on a specific clinical outcome, several drawbacks pose practical limitations to the implementation of a clinical trial in the critical care setting for this purpose. First, most European countries (and particularly Italy) do not allow the enrollment and randomization of non-competent patients (as critically ill patients formally are), due to ethical issues. Second, clinical trials are associated with very high costs. Third, the quality of results and conclusions deriving from post-hoc analysis of randomized clinical trials (often underpowered) may be qualitatively similar to those obtained from a very large database of patients observed during treatments performed according to the routine clinical practice.

As an example, COMPACT and COMPACT 2 trials, failed to demonstrate a significant effect of Coupled plasma-filtration adsorption (CPFA) on the outcome of critically ill septic patients, with the notable exception of specific subpopulations (e.g. those where an adequate volume of plasma was filtered and adsorbed). This conclusion was obtained through two highly-costly multicenter randomized clinical trials, prematurely halted due to ethical issues, using post-hoc analysis of a subgroup of an already limited sample size.

Nowadays, the identification of specific clusters of patients during EBPT is obtained by means of the implementation of a large web-based registry where a network of researchers can upload the clinical data of patients undergoing EBPT in line with the routine clinical practice of each single center. Taking into consideration the feasibility of the research (i.e. mainly related with the lack of critical ethical issues and the easy-to-use interface of web-platforms), these observation-based registries are inexpensive and effective tools able to identify specific clusters of patients within a very large sample size with widely heterogeneous clinical characteristics.

As an example, a web-based registry has been already implemented to describe the clinical effects of polymyxin-B based cartridges for endotoxin removal (EUPHAS 2 registry). Another one has been similarly implemented to describe the clinical effects of un-selective cytokine adsorption obtained with CytoSorb (CytoSorb registry).

Taking into consideration the fact that data on CPFA already exist and web-based registries are already available for Toraymixin and for CytoSorb, the aim of this project is to design and nationally promote a web-based registry specifically designed for oXiris membrane. In particular, an easy-to-use web-based platform will be made available for all centers that spontaneously adhere to this project.

Three main characteristics will distinguish this web-based registry of the clinical use of oXiris membrane when compared with the already available Euphas 2 and CytoSorb registries. First, it will also be available for smartphone and/or tablet applications; this characteristic will guarantee easy-to-use access and data uploading and enhanced compliance from clinical researchers. Second, it will not be confined to a simplistic registration of patients' data; it will instead also provide the clinician with clinical tools that might be helpful for patient management (e.g. automatic calculation of clinical scoring systems, ideal body weight, functions of mechanical ventilation, antibiotic adjustment according to renal function, etc.). All these tools will provide the clinician with real-time feedback; this web-based registry will provide a clear example of translational medicine and translational research, where data from clinical practice will feed a database for clinical research and, contemporaneously, the research tool will improve clinical practice, providing useful instruments for routine practice. Finally, this web-based registry will allow every center to instantaneously evaluate its results, providing a real-time basic statistic for every recorded variable (e.g. age at enrollment, main comorbidities, baseline serum creatinine, mortality rate, rate of multidrug resistant bacteria, etc.). This function may allow each center to continuously monitor outcomes and local practices, and will represent a major improvement when compared to already existing platforms in Italy, such as the Prosafe.

With this rationale, the research questions are:

* Is there a cluster of critically ill patients that mostly benefits from extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT) with oXiris membrane?
* Might some baseline variables be used to identify this subpopulation of "responsive" patients? In particular, may these indicators be employed to guide indications for EBPT with oXiris, in order to personalize treatments and improve patients' long-term outcome?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness Acute Kidney Injury Sepsis Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Critically ill patients

In centres that obtained IRB approval for this prospective study, all critically ill adult patients (\>18yrs) undergoing treatment with oXiris will be prospectively observed.

oXiris

Intervention Type DEVICE

Every center will prescribe EBPT with oXiris in accordance with local practice and local levels of expertise. No variation in treatment prescription and/or treatment solutions will derive from participation in this prospective observational study. Nonetheless, every setting parameter will be recorded in the web-based registry and analyzed a-posteriori to reveal a potential correlation with the patient outcomes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

oXiris

Every center will prescribe EBPT with oXiris in accordance with local practice and local levels of expertise. No variation in treatment prescription and/or treatment solutions will derive from participation in this prospective observational study. Nonetheless, every setting parameter will be recorded in the web-based registry and analyzed a-posteriori to reveal a potential correlation with the patient outcomes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* critically ill patients in the ICU
* treatment with oXiris

Exclusion Criteria

* age \< 18 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Florence

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Careggi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gianluca Villa

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gianluca Villa, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

U. of Florence- Dept of Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Presidio Ospedaliero di Esine

Esine, Brescia, Italy

Site Status

S. Giuseppe Hospital

Empoli, Firenze, Italy

Site Status

IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato Milanese

San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Sacro Cuore di Gesù-Fatebenefratelli

Benevento, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

A.O.U. della Campania "L. Vanvitelli"

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale San Jacopo

Pistoia, , Italy

Site Status

S.Camillo Forlanini Hospital

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Cristo Re Hospital

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cruz DN, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, Foltran F, Brienza N, Donati A, Malcangi V, Petrini F, Volta G, Bobbio Pallavicini FM, Rottoli F, Giunta F, Ronco C. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in abdominal septic shock: the EUPHAS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jun 17;301(23):2445-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.856.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19531784 (View on PubMed)

Klein DJ, Foster D, Schorr CA, Kazempour K, Walker PM, Dellinger RP. The EUPHRATES trial (Evaluating the Use of Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion in a Randomized controlled trial of Adults Treated for Endotoxemia and Septic shock): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jun 11;15:218. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-218.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24916483 (View on PubMed)

Livigni S, Bertolini G, Rossi C, Ferrari F, Giardino M, Pozzato M, Remuzzi G; GiViTI: Gruppo Italiano per la Valutazione degli Interventi in Terapia Intensiva (Italian Group for the Evaluation of Interventions in Intensive Care Medicine) is an independent collaboration network of Italian Intensive Care units. Efficacy of coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) in patients with septic shock: a multicenter randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 8;4(1):e003536. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003536.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24401721 (View on PubMed)

Cutuli SL, Artigas A, Fumagalli R, Monti G, Ranieri VM, Ronco C, Antonelli M; EUPHAS 2 Collaborative Group. Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion in septic patients: analysis of a multicenter registry. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0178-9. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27502196 (View on PubMed)

Friesecke S, Trager K, Schittek GA, Molnar Z, Bach F, Kogelmann K, Bogdanski R, Weyland A, Nierhaus A, Nestler F, Olboeter D, Tomescu D, Jacob D, Haake H, Grigoryev E, Nitsch M, Baumann A, Quintel M, Schott M, Kielstein JT, Meier-Hellmann A, Born F, Schumacher U, Singer M, Kellum J, Brunkhorst FM. International registry on the use of the CytoSorb(R) adsorber in ICU patients : Study protocol and preliminary results. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019 Nov;114(8):699-707. doi: 10.1007/s00063-017-0342-5. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28871441 (View on PubMed)

Santorsola C, Corona A, Cecchi M, Nicolini NC, Zendra E, Capone A, Gatti I, Brivio M, Falsini S, Villa G. Dynamic CRRT Prescription for Complicated Critically Ill Patient: A Case Report. Case Rep Crit Care. 2024 Nov 20;2024:1837150. doi: 10.1155/2024/1837150. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39611098 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEAVC14334

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SIRAKI 02 Posthoc Analysis.
NCT06781294 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA