Preventing Acute Kidney Injury and Improving Outcome in Critically Ill Patients Utilising Risk Prediction Score
NCT ID: NCT03178435
Last Updated: 2019-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
198 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-01
2018-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients
NCT03338127
Acute Kidney Injury in Intensive Care Patients
NCT05970952
Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT04154007
Risk Factors And Outcomes Of Hospital Acquired AKI
NCT06051708
Assessment of AI Prediction Models in Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critical Patients
NCT06857188
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is a well recognized gap between the optimal care and the delivered care regarding prevention and management of AKI.
The focus over the last few years has been on early detection. A panel of urinary biomarkers have proved helpful for early detection of AKI. However the cost and low specificity make no single one of them solely reliable .using a panel of bio-markers increases their specificity.
The concept of electronic alerts has been recently introduced. Some trials have been testing its impact on the outcome of AKI. The benefit of electronic alerts is still uncertain .A meta-analysis is currently underway to synthesize stronger evidence of electronic alerts benefit.
Another evolving area, is the development of risk score to predict AKI and and hence applying timely preventive measures.
KDIGO recommends applying preventive measures to high risk patients. However no study to date has tested risk scores based interventions
Hypothesis:
We will use the recently validated score to predict AKI in ICU patients. We will then apply preventive measures. To patients at risk .To our knowledge this is the first study to apply preventive interventions based on AKI risk score assessment
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Observational
patients will be recruited to this arm to observe prospectively the incidence of AKI among critically ill patients.patients will receive the standard care.No other intervention will be delivered
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventional
Patients in this arm will be subject to AKI risk score. This risk score was recently developed and validated in Mayo clinic the intervention will be Measures to prevent AKI among critically ill patients
Measures to prevent AKI among critically ill patients
1. Meticulous optimization of the fluid balance
2. Avoidance of nephrotoxic medications where possible
3. Optimisation of the hemodynamic status
4. Avoidance of blood transfusion unless marked acute blood loss or symptomatic anemia
5. Optimization of the underlying medical condition
6. Seek expert renal advise when necessary
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Measures to prevent AKI among critically ill patients
1. Meticulous optimization of the fluid balance
2. Avoidance of nephrotoxic medications where possible
3. Optimisation of the hemodynamic status
4. Avoidance of blood transfusion unless marked acute blood loss or symptomatic anemia
5. Optimization of the underlying medical condition
6. Seek expert renal advise when necessary
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with insufficient medical records to obtain previous medical history
3. Patients who lack mental capacity
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kasr El Aini Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tarek Samy Abdelaziz
Senior lecturer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo university hospitals
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KA-13050
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.