Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
620 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2016-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. an "early" strategy where RRT is started immediately when a RIFLE F status is documented
2. a "delayed" strategy where RRT (in patients who also present RIFLE F renal failure) is started only in case of occurrence of one or more of the following events ("Alert Criteria"): oliguria or anuria lasting for more than 72 hours after randomization, serum urea concentration \> 40 mmol /L, serum potassium concentration \> 6 mmol /L, serum potassium concentration \> 5.5 mmol /L that persists despite well-conducted medical treatment with at least sodium bicarbonate and / or glucose-insulin infusion, arterial pH \< 7.15 in the context of pure metabolic acidosis (PaCO2 \<35 mmHg) or in the context of mixed acidosis with PaCO2\> 50 mmHg without possibility of lowering this PaCO2 value, acute overload pulmonary edema generating severe hypoxemia requiring oxygen flow\> 5L/min in spontaneously breathing patients or FiO2\> 50% in mechanically (invasive or noninvasive) ventilated to maintain SpO2\> 95%, despite diuretic therapy.
The primary endpoint is overall survival, measured from the date of randomization to the date of death, regardless of the cause. The minimum duration of each patient's follow-up will be 60 days.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury 2
NCT03396757
Early Versus Late Renal Replacement Therapy After Cardiac Surgery
NCT01961999
Predictive Score for the Success of Discontinuation of Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) in Intensive Care
NCT07317362
Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients With Severe Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy
NCT02897310
Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy in the Critically Ill Patients
NCT03629977
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is the major supportive treatment of AKI. Despite progress in RRT management, mortality remains high and the timing of its initiation remains open to debate when no metabolic disorder (severe hyperkalemia or metabolic acidosis) or major fluid overload threaten short-term prognosis. Such abnormalities mandate RRT and are non-inclusion criteria of our study. Whereas many studies have focused on RRT modalities, no prospective randomized study has evaluated the criteria for initiating RRT in ICU in the absence of the above-mentioned life-threatening disorders. In other words, whether duration of oliguria/anuria and/or value of serum urea/creatinine are an adequate indication for RRT is unknown. Given the lack of high quality data, it is not surprising that survey of practices showed wide variation in the timing of RRT initiation and that no precise guidelines could be drawn by expert recommendation as to the optimal start of RRT, making a randomised controlled study of timing of RRT both desirable and ethical.
Objective:
The main objective of this study is to compare two strategies of RRT initiation in terms of overall survival in ICU patients (mechanically ventilated and/or receiving catecholamine infusion) with severe AKI defined as RIFLE F classification. These patients will be randomly allocated to one of the following strategies:
1. an "early" strategy where RRT is started immediately when a RIFLE F status is documented
2. a "delayed" strategy where RRT (in patients who also present RIFLE F renal failure) is started only in case of occurrence of one or more of the following events ("Alert Criteria"): oliguria or anuria lasting for more than 72 hours after randomization, serum urea concentration \> 40 mmol /L, serum potassium concentration \> 6 mmol /L, serum potassium concentration \> 5.5 mmol /L that persists despite well-conducted medical treatment with at least sodium bicarbonate and / or glucose-insulin infusion, arterial pH \< 7.15 in the context of pure metabolic acidosis (PaCO2 \<35 mmHg) or in the context of mixed acidosis with PaCO2\> 50 mmHg without possibility of lowering this PaCO2 value, acute overload pulmonary edema generating severe hypoxemia requiring oxygen flow\> 5L/min in spontaneously breathing patients or FiO2\> 50% in mechanically (invasive or noninvasive) ventilated to maintain SpO2\> 95%, despite diuretic therapy.
Design:
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial comparing two RRT initiation strategies in terms of overall survival.
Primary endpoint:
Overall survival, measured from the date of randomization to the date of death, regardless of the cause. The minimum duration of each patient's follow-up will be 60 days.
Secondary endpoints:
Survival rate at day 28, percentage of patients requiring who did not require RRT in the "delayed" strategy, time until cessation of RRT therapy, rate of adverse events potentially related to the AKI or to RRT (e.g; RRT catheter-related complications, hemorrhage due to anticoagulation required for RRT etc…), rate of nosocomial infections, number of ventilator-free days of RRT-free days and of vasopressors free days, length of stay in ICU and hospital, rate of limitations of treatment for futility, total cost of consumables (including RRT catheters and lines among others) related to RRT between day 1 and day 28.
Number of subjects required:
We hypothesized that the "delayed" strategy would prove beneficial to the patients and would translate into increased survival. The study is designed to prove superiority (and not noninferiority) of this strategy over the "early" one.
The 60 days survival rate with the "early" strategy is estimated to be 45%. It is necessary to include 620 patients (310 per arm) to obtain a power of 90% to detect a survival improvement of 14% at day 60 with the "delayed" strategy (log-rank two tailed test, global significance level of 5%), with two blind interim analyses by independent observers at 90 and 180 deaths (group sequential approach of O'Brien-Fleming), and a estimated dropout rate of 10%.
Duration of study:
Inclusion: 18 months Minimum participation of each patient: 60 days Analysis and report: 10 months
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Early RRT strategy
the "early" strategy : RRT is started immediately when a RIFLE F status is documented
Early RRT strategy
the "early" strategy : RRT is started immediately when a RIFLE F status is documented
Delayed RRT strategy
The "delayed" strategy : RRT (in patients who also present RIFLE F renal failure) is started only in case of occurrence of one or more of the "Alert Criteria"
Delayed RRT strategy
The "delayed" strategy : RRT (in patients who also present RIFLE F renal failure) is started only in case of occurrence of one or more of the "Alert Criteria": see summary
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Early RRT strategy
the "early" strategy : RRT is started immediately when a RIFLE F status is documented
Delayed RRT strategy
The "delayed" strategy : RRT (in patients who also present RIFLE F renal failure) is started only in case of occurrence of one or more of the "Alert Criteria": see summary
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age ≥ 18 years
3. Acute kidney injury compatible with the diagnosis of acute tubular necrosis defined by a clinical ischemic or toxic insult context
4. Have an AKI classified as RIFLE F, that is to say, with at least one of the following three criteria:
* creatinine\> 354 mmol / l or \> 3 times the baseline creatinine
* anuria for more than 12 hours
* oliguria defined as urine output \< 0.3 ml / kg / h or \< 500ml/d for more than 24 hours
5. Mechanical ventilation and/or catecholamines infusion (noradrenaline or/and adrenaline)
One or more of the following criteria:
* Chronic renal failure (defined as creatinine clearance \< 30 ml / min)
* Patients already enrolled in the study
* Acute renal failure due to:
* urinary tract obstruction
* renal vessels obstruction
* tumor lysis syndrome
* thrombotic microangiopathy
* acute glomerulonephritis
* Intoxication with a dialyzable product
* Child-Pugh class C liver cirrhosis
* Renal transplant
* Cardiac arrest without awakening at time of potential inclusion
* Moribund state
* Decision to limit treatment
* RRT already started for the current episode of AKI
* Presenting (at the time of potential inclusion) a strong indication for immediate RRT
* oligoanuria for more than 3 days
* serum urea concentration \> 40 mmol / l serum potassium concentration \> 6 mmol /L, serum potassium concentration \> 5.5 mmol /L that persists despite well-conducted medical treatment with at least sodium bicarbonate and / or glucose-insulin infusion, arterial pH \< 7.15 in the context of pure metabolic acidosis (PaCO2 \<35 mmHg) or in the context of mixed acidosis with PaCO2\> 50 mmHg without possibility of lowering this PaCO2 value, acute overload pulmonary edema generating severe hypoxemia requiring oxygen flow\> 5L/min in spontaneously breathing patients or FiO2\> 50% in mechanically (invasive or noninvasive) ventilated to maintain SpO2\> 95%, despite diuretic therapy.
* Under cardiopulmonary bypass
* Included in another clinical trial on RRT modalities.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Didier DREYFUSS, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Louis Mourier
Colombes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Roux D, Benichou N, Hajage D, Martin-Lefevre L, de Prost N, Lerolle N, Titeca-Beauport D, Boulet E, Mayaux J, Megarbane B, Mahjoub K, Carpentier D, Nseir S, Tubach F, Ricard JD, Dreyfuss D, Gaudry S; AKIKI Study group. Impact of renal replacement therapy strategy on beta-lactam plasma concentrations: the BETAKIKI study-an ancillary study of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Feb 25;13(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01105-0.
Fayad AI, Buamscha DG, Ciapponi A. Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 23;11(11):CD010612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010612.pub3.
Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, Martin-Lefevre L, Verney C, Pons B, Boulet E, Boyer A, Chevrel G, Lerolle N, Carpentier D, de Prost N, Lautrette A, Bretagnol A, Mayaux J, Nseir S, Megarbane B, Thirion M, Forel JM, Maizel J, Yonis H, Markowicz P, Thiery G, Tubach F, Ricard JD, Dreyfuss D. Timing of Renal Support and Outcome of Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Post Hoc Analysis of the AKIKI Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul 1;198(1):58-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1255OC.
Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, Martin-Lefevre L, Pons B, Boulet E, Boyer A, Chevrel G, Lerolle N, Carpentier D, de Prost N, Lautrette A, Bretagnol A, Mayaux J, Nseir S, Megarbane B, Thirion M, Forel JM, Maizel J, Yonis H, Markowicz P, Thiery G, Tubach F, Ricard JD, Dreyfuss D; AKIKI Study Group. Initiation Strategies for Renal-Replacement Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):122-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603017. Epub 2016 May 15.
Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, Martin-Lefevre L, Tubach F, Pons B, Boulet E, Boyer A, Lerolle N, Chevrel G, Carpentier D, Lautrette A, Bretagnol A, Mayaux J, Thirion M, Markowicz P, Thomas G, Dellamonica J, Richecoeur J, Darmon M, de Prost N, Yonis H, Megarbane B, Loubieres Y, Blayau C, Maizel J, Zuber B, Nseir S, Bige N, Hoffmann I, Ricard JD, Dreyfuss D. Comparison of two strategies for initiating renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (AKIKI). Trials. 2015 Apr 17;16:170. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0718-x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-A00765-40
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
AOM12456 - K120102
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.