Standard Versus Accelerated Initiation of Dialysis in Acute Kidney Injury
NCT ID: NCT01557361
Last Updated: 2014-09-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-05-31
2013-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Feasible, in terms of adherence to the protocol (primary outcome), recruitment rates, and achievement of follow-up; and
2. Safe, from the perspective of potential adverse events associated with earlier initiation of RRT
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Standard vs. Accelerated Initiation of RRT in Acute Kidney Injury (STARRT-AKI: Principal Trial)
NCT02568722
Promoting Kidney Recovery After Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Dialysis
NCT04948476
Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury
NCT01932190
The Artificial Kidney Initiation in Kidney Injury 2
NCT03396757
Enhanced Kidney Follow-up for AKI Survivors in Care Transitions
NCT04505891
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objectives of this trial are to determine whether, in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), randomization to accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT), compared with standard initiation, is:
1. Feasible, in terms of adherence to the protocol (primary outcome), recruitment rates, and achievement of follow-up; and
2. Safe, from the perspective of potential adverse events associated with the earlier or later initiation of RRT
This pilot trial is intended to guide and inform the design of a phase III multicentre randomized trial of accelerated versus standard initiation of RRT in critically ill patients that will evaluate the impact of the intervention on 90-day all-cause mortality and recovery of kidney function.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard RRT initiation
RRT is initiated \>12 hours after eligibility determination. Once a decision is made to start RRT, a dialysis catheter will be placed and RRT initiated as soon as possible.
Standard RRT initiation
Patients will be carefully followed over a period of 7 days to identify potential indications for RRT. The trial team will ask that the clinical team consider RRT initiation if there are:
I. Criteria for persistent AKI (serum creatinine has not declined by more than 50% from value recorded at time of eligibility) AND
II. At least one of the following indications for RRT initiation:
1. Serum potassium ≥6.0 mmol/L, or
2. Serum bicarbonate ≤ 10 mmol/L, or
3. Evidence of severe respiratory failure, based on a PaO2/FiO2 \<200 and bilateral infiltrates on the chest x-ray, or
4. By 72 hours after randomization, creatinine has not declined by more than 50% from that recorded at the time of randomization
Accelerated RRT initiation
A dialysis catheter will be placed and RRT initiated as soon as possible and within 12 hours of eligibility.
Accelerated RRT initiation
A dialysis catheter will be placed and RRT initiated as soon as possible and within 12 hours of eligibility. This 12 hour window includes the time needed to obtain consent.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Accelerated RRT initiation
A dialysis catheter will be placed and RRT initiated as soon as possible and within 12 hours of eligibility. This 12 hour window includes the time needed to obtain consent.
Standard RRT initiation
Patients will be carefully followed over a period of 7 days to identify potential indications for RRT. The trial team will ask that the clinical team consider RRT initiation if there are:
I. Criteria for persistent AKI (serum creatinine has not declined by more than 50% from value recorded at time of eligibility) AND
II. At least one of the following indications for RRT initiation:
1. Serum potassium ≥6.0 mmol/L, or
2. Serum bicarbonate ≤ 10 mmol/L, or
3. Evidence of severe respiratory failure, based on a PaO2/FiO2 \<200 and bilateral infiltrates on the chest x-ray, or
4. By 72 hours after randomization, creatinine has not declined by more than 50% from that recorded at the time of randomization
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Admission to an intensive care unit
3. Evidence of kidney dysfunction (serum creatinine ≥ 100 µmol/L (women) or
≥ 130 µmol/L (men))
4. Evidence of severe AKI defined by at least 2 of the following 3 criteria:
i-A 2-fold increase in serum creatinine during hospitalization or from a known pre-hospitalization baseline ii-Oliguria as defined by total urine output \< 6 mL/kg over the preceding 12 hours iii-Whole blood Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) ≥ 400ng/mL
5. Likelihood that an absolute indication for RRT will not arise in the subsequent 24 hours based on the most recent bloodwork for the following parameters: i- Serum potassium ≤ 5.5 mmol/L and ii- Serum bicarbonate ≥ 15 mmol/L
6. Central venous pressure ≥ 8 mmHg
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of a drug overdose that necessitates initiation of RRT
3. Any RRT within the previous 2 months
4. Presence or clinical suspicion of renal obstruction, rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, or acute interstitial nephritis
5. Advanced chronic kidney disease, defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, based on pre-hospitalization blood work
6. Kidney transplant within the past 365 days
7. At the time of screening, doubling of serum creatinine has been present for \> 48 hours
8. Clinician(s) caring for patient believe(s) that immediate dialysis is absolutely mandated
9. Clinician(s) caring for patient believe(s) that deferral of dialysis initiation is mandated
10. Patient or substitute decision maker can not provide consent within 12 hours of study eligibility
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Alere San Diego
INDUSTRY
Unity Health Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ron Wald, MDCM MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Unity Health Toronto
Sean M Bagshaw, MD MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alberta
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
St. Joseph's Healthcare
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital
London, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital
London, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Centre hopitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wing S, Neto AS, Bellomo R, Clark EG, Gallagher M, Liangos O, Prasad B, Silver SA, Tolwani A, Bagshaw S, Wald R. CKD Progression after Acute Kidney Injury: A Secondary Analysis of the Standard versus Accelerated Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury Trial. Kidney360. 2025 Apr 1;6(4):636-644. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000663. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
Fayad AI, Buamscha DG, Ciapponi A. Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 23;11(11):CD010612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010612.pub3.
Smith OM, Wald R, Adhikari NK, Pope K, Weir MA, Bagshaw SM; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Standard versus accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (STARRT-AKI): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Oct 5;14:320. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-320.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIHR MOP 111116
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.