Patients Undergoing Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration: Effects of Increased Blood Flow

NCT ID: NCT05796661

Last Updated: 2024-06-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-09

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute Kidney Injure (AKI) is a syndrome with high incidence and prevalence in Intensive Care Units (ICU). It is estimated that 50% of the in the sector present AKI at some point and 10 to 15% require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Although studies do not show the superiority of continuous methods, the most severely ill patients are directed to this type of RRT. A disadvantage of continuous therapies is the need for anticoagulation. Critically ill patients have a pro-clotting state (inflammation) and several risk factors for bleeding (coagulopathies, postoperative, large vessel puncture).

On the one hand, ineffective anticoagulation compromises the efficiency of the procedure, shortens the life of the extracorporeal system, consumes resources and increases blood loss due to unexpected and early filter clotting. There is no consensus on what would be the optimal blood flow (Qb) in continuous dialysis, especially when regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is used. Theoretically, a higher flow rate would prevent stasis in the system and decrease the risk of filter clotting. Studies show conflicting results. Increasing Qb from 150 to 250 mL/min showed that circuit life and the chance of coagulation were similar. On the other hand, blood flow is important for maintaining the filtration fraction (FF), the ratio of ultrafiltrate flow to plasma flow. Ideally, the FF should be kept below 25% to avoid hemoconcentration and coagulation of the filter. Therefore, the higher the convection rate, the higher the blood flow should be to keep the FF in the optimal range. Since the anticoagulation capacity of citrate is dependent on its concentration, around 4 mmol/L of blood, by increasing the blood flow, the citrate infusion is proportionally increased. Theoretically, the higher citrate load offered should be metabolized and, in theory, could cause its overload with the occurrence of metabolic alkalosis and hypernatremia. This situation occurs when its maximum metabolizing capacity is not reached and there is an excess of citrate infusion relative to the buffering requirement. Thus, we intend to evaluate filter useful life, metabolic control, electrolyte profile and acid-base balance in ICU patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), regional citrate anticoagulation during blood flow augmentation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a clinical syndrome with a high incidence and prevalence in Intensive care units (ICU). It is estimated that 50% of ICU patients have AKI at some point.

About 10-15% of these individuals require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Although studies have not conclusively shown the superiority of continuous methods, the most severe patients are usually referred for this type of therapy.

The main indications for continuous therapies are hemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, severe respiratory insufficiency, risk situations for brain edema, hypercatabolism, need for strict volume control, acute liver disease and major sodium disturbances. One of the main disadvantages of continuous therapies is the necessity of anticoagulation. Critically ill patients have a pro-clotting state (inflammation) and several risk factors for bleeding (coagulopathies, postoperative, large vessel puncture). On the one hand, the lack or ineffective anticoagulation compromises the efficiency of the procedure, shortens the life of the extracorporeal system, consumes resources and increases blood loss due to unexpected and early filter coagulation. On the other hand, excessive use of anticoagulants, especially heparin, is associated with bleeding and increased transfusions.

In this scenario, regional anticoagulation with citrate (RCA) has become the method of choice in the different modalities of continuous dialysis. When compared to heparin, the use of regional citrate anticoagulation is associated with less bleeding and transfusion need and longer life of the extracorporeal system. It also seems to decrease endothelial activation, neutrophil degranulation and activation of the complement system.

The anticoagulate property of citrate is based on its binding to calcium (Ca). Citrate quenches Ca in the extracorporeal system, an essential cofactor in several steps of coagulation. Optimal anticoagulation is achieved when ionic Ca concentration in the extracorporeal circuit is maintained between 0.25 and 0.35 mmol/L. This is usually achieved with a citrate level in the circuit around 4mmol/L of blood. Depending on the modality chosen and other factors, up to 60% of the citrate-Ca complex is eliminated during passage through the filter (molecular weigh of 298 Daltons and partition coefficient of 1.0). The rest is metabolized in the Krebs cycle mainly in the liver, kidneys and skeletal muscles. Each mol of trisodium citrate causes 3 moles of bicarbonate thus correctly, partially or completely, the metabolic acidosis resulting from renal failure. Ca and sodium (Na) are released into the systemic circulation. Trisodium citrate also increases the strong ion difference due to the high sodium concentration in the solution, thus increasing the buffering capacity. In parallel it is necessary the Ca replacement to maintain normal calcemia. The citrate also quenches magnesium, which can lead to a disturbance of this electrolyte.

There is no consensus on what the optimal blood flow (Qb) would be in continuous dialysis, especially when using regional citrate anticoagulation. Theoretically, a higher blood flow would prevent stasis in the system and thus decrease the risk of filter coagulation. Studies show conflicting results. For example, one study evaluated increasing Qb from 150 to 250 mL/min and showed that circuit useful life and the chance of coagulation of the extracorporeal system were similar between the two groups. On the other hand, blood flow is important for maintaining the filtration fraction (FF), the ratio of ultra-filtrated flow to plasma flow (blood flow minus hematocrit). Ideally, the FF should be kept below 25% to avoid hemoconcentration and coagulation of the filter capillary fibers. So the higher the convection rate (ultrafiltration), the higher the blood flow should be to keep the FF in the optimal range.

Since the anticoagulation capacity of citrate is dependent on its concentration, around 4 mmol/L of blood, by increasing blood flow, citrate infusion is proportionally increased. Theoretically, the higher citrate load offered should be metabolized and, in theory, could lead to citrate overload with the occurrence of metabolic alkalosis and hypernatremia. This situation occurs when the maximum capacity of citrate metabolization is not reached and there is an excess of citrate infusion relative to the buffering requirement. The total Ca/systemic ionic Ca ration remains normal, below 2.5. The oversupply of citrate can be easily corrected by decreasing the bicarbonate concentration of the dialysate, increasing the dialysate dose or decreasing the citrate infusion.

Therefore, we intend to evaluate filter useful life, metabolic control, electrolyte profile and acid-base balance in ICU patients with AKI undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), regional anticoagulation with citrate during increased blood flow.

Hypothesis: Increasing blood flow during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration prevents stasis in the system and thus reduces the risk of filter coagulation. Blood flow is important for maintaining the filtration fraction (FF), the ratio of ultrafiltrate flow to plasma flow (blood flow minus hematocrit). Ideally, the FF should be kept below 25% to avoid hemoconcentration and coagulation of the filter capillary fibers. So the higher convection rate (ultrafiltration), the higher the blood flow should be to keep the FF in the optimal range. Therefore, it is expected that higher blood flow (250 mL/min) will reduce the FF and concomitantly prolong the life of the filter.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Kidney Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This is a randomized, crossover, single-center study, with inclusion of patients over a period of 11 months, between January 9, 2023 and November 30, 2023. We aim to include 27 patients. Randomized by raffle, which will be carried out manually in blocks divided into 3 envelopes numbered from 01 to 03, and within them will contain 9 papers, also numbered from 1 to 27 with the definition of control group and experimental group. Following the order from 01 to 03, the envelopes will have: envelope 1: 9 samples (5 for control group and 4 for experimental group); envelope 2: 9 samples (4 for control group and 5 for experimental group); envelope 3: 9 samples (5 for control group and 4 for experimental group). Groups: Qb150 (control group) (blood flow 150 mL/min), Qb250 (experimental group) (blood flow 250 mL/min). Time for each treatment: 72 hours. Crossover: after 72 hours. Treatment pause (wash-out): 4 (minimum) to 6 (maximum) hours.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Qb150

This group will be exposed to continuous venovenous therapy with a blood flow of 150ml/min; already standardized by the institution; for a maximum time of 72 hours or interrupted sooner if the system clots or the filter loses patency.

Both groups will have a "wash out" of 6 hours before crossing the arms of the work.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Effects of increased blood flow during regional anticoagulation with 4% trisodium citrate in patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients will be exposed to continuous venovenous renal therapy with distinct blood flows in 2 periods, to be defined by draw. The control group will have a flow of 150ml/min and the intervention group 250ml/min. Therapy is intended for a period of 72 hours (maximum defined by the manufacturer); with a 6-hour "washout" and, after that, the arm is changed to be exposed to the other blood flow.

Qb 250

This group will be exposed to continuous venovenous therapy with a blood flow of 250ml/min; experimental group to evaluate increased blood flow and filter durability; for a maximum time of 72 hours or interrupted sooner if the system clots or the filter loses patency.

Both groups will have a "wash out" of 6 hours before crossing the arms of the work.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Effects of increased blood flow during regional anticoagulation with 4% trisodium citrate in patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients will be exposed to continuous venovenous renal therapy with distinct blood flows in 2 periods, to be defined by draw. The control group will have a flow of 150ml/min and the intervention group 250ml/min. Therapy is intended for a period of 72 hours (maximum defined by the manufacturer); with a 6-hour "washout" and, after that, the arm is changed to be exposed to the other blood flow.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Effects of increased blood flow during regional anticoagulation with 4% trisodium citrate in patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration

Patients will be exposed to continuous venovenous renal therapy with distinct blood flows in 2 periods, to be defined by draw. The control group will have a flow of 150ml/min and the intervention group 250ml/min. Therapy is intended for a period of 72 hours (maximum defined by the manufacturer); with a 6-hour "washout" and, after that, the arm is changed to be exposed to the other blood flow.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age greater than 18 years.
* Weight ≥ 50 Kg.
* Agreeing to participate in the study (TCLE duly elucidated and signed by the patient or family member/guardian).
* Admitted to the hospital ICU.
* Acute Kidney Injury in need of RRT and indication (according to the evaluation of the assistant nephrologist) of continuous therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years.
* Weight \< 50 Kg.
* Refusal to participate in the study (absence of informed consent).
* Patient with chronic kidney disease on dialysis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lucas T Avila Neto

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Israelite Albert Einstein

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kellum JA, Romagnani P, Ashuntantang G, Ronco C, Zarbock A, Anders HJ. Acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jul 15;7(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00284-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34267223 (View on PubMed)

Fuhrman DY, Kellum JA. Acute Kidney Injury in the Intensive Care Unit: Advances in the Identification, Classification, and Treatment of a Multifactorial Syndrome. Crit Care Clin. 2021 Apr;37(2):xiii-xv. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Feb 13. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33752867 (View on PubMed)

Bellomo R, Baldwin I, Ronco C, Kellum JA. ICU-Based Renal Replacement Therapy. Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):406-418. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004831. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33555775 (View on PubMed)

Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-84. doi: 10.1159/000339789. Epub 2012 Aug 7. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22890468 (View on PubMed)

Khadzhynov D, Schelter C, Lieker I, Mika A, Staeck O, Neumayer HH, Peters H, Slowinski T. Incidence and outcome of metabolic disarrangements consistent with citrate accumulation in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation. J Crit Care. 2014 Apr;29(2):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.10.015. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24360392 (View on PubMed)

Gattas DJ, Rajbhandari D, Bradford C, Buhr H, Lo S, Bellomo R. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Regional Citrate Versus Regional Heparin Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Adults. Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1622-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25853591 (View on PubMed)

Stucker F, Ponte B, Tataw J, Martin PY, Wozniak H, Pugin J, Saudan P. Efficacy and safety of citrate-based anticoagulation compared to heparin in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2015 Mar 18;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0822-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25881975 (View on PubMed)

Meersch M, Kullmar M, Wempe C, Kindgen-Milles D, Kluge S, Slowinski T, Marx G, Gerss J, Zarbock A; SepNet Critical Care Trials Group. Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e024411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024411.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30670518 (View on PubMed)

Zarbock A, Kullmar M, Kindgen-Milles D, Wempe C, Gerss J, Brandenburger T, Dimski T, Tyczynski B, Jahn M, Mulling N, Mehrlander M, Rosenberger P, Marx G, Simon TP, Jaschinski U, Deetjen P, Putensen C, Schewe JC, Kluge S, Jarczak D, Slowinski T, Bodenstein M, Meybohm P, Wirtz S, Moerer O, Kortgen A, Simon P, Bagshaw SM, Kellum JA, Meersch M; RICH Investigators and the Sepnet Trial Group. Effect of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation vs Systemic Heparin Anticoagulation During Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy on Dialysis Filter Life Span and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Oct 27;324(16):1629-1639. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.18618.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33095849 (View on PubMed)

Kramer L, Bauer E, Joukhadar C, Strobl W, Gendo A, Madl C, Gangl A. Citrate pharmacokinetics and metabolism in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2003 Oct;31(10):2450-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000084871.76568.E6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14530750 (View on PubMed)

Bauer E, Derfler K, Joukhadar C, Druml W. Citrate kinetics in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis therapy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Nov;46(5):903-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.041.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16253731 (View on PubMed)

Yu W, Zhuang F, Ma S, Fan Q, Zhu M, Ding F. Optimized Calcium Supplementation Approach for Regional Citrate Anticoagulation. Nephron. 2019;141(2):119-127. doi: 10.1159/000494693. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30448847 (View on PubMed)

Schneider AG, Journois D, Rimmele T. Complications of regional citrate anticoagulation: accumulation or overload? Crit Care. 2017 Nov 19;21(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1880-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29151020 (View on PubMed)

AYRES, M., AYRES Jr, M., AYRES, D. L., SANTOS, A. A. S. Bioestat 5.3 aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biológicas e médicas. Belém: IDSM, 2007.364p.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRRT-QbTrial

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Preventing Acute Kidney Injury
NCT04376619 WITHDRAWN NA