The Efficacity of Hemodiafiltration Versus Hemofiltration for Renal Insufficiency During Intensive Care

NCT ID: NCT01403220

Last Updated: 2025-11-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

163 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-30

Study Completion Date

2015-03-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacity of hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration for decreasing plasma urea at 12h among intensive care patients. Secondary objectives include comparing urea clearance, filter duration, and %down-time, between the two techniques.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Failure, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 (hemodiafiltration first)

This group of patients will alternate consecutive dialysis sequences between hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration, but starting with hemodiafiltration.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hemodiafiltration first

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will alternate consecutive dialysis sequences between hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration, but starting with hemodiafiltration.

Group 2 (hemofiltration first)

This group of patients will alternate consecutive dialysis sequences between hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration, but starting with hemofiltration.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hemofiltration first

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will alternate consecutive dialysis sequences between hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration, but starting with hemofiltration.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hemodiafiltration first

Patients will alternate consecutive dialysis sequences between hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration, but starting with hemodiafiltration.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hemofiltration first

Patients will alternate consecutive dialysis sequences between hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration, but starting with hemofiltration.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* According to RIFLE score, patient is stage 'F'
* The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
* The patient meets at least one of the following criteria:
* metabolic acidosis (pH \< 7.2), excluding keto-acidosis
* plasma urea \> 25 mmol/l
* hyper-hydration is not controlled by diuretics

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic, terminal renal insufficiency with dialysis
* The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
* Suspect hyperkaliemia (Kaliemia \> 6.5 mmol/l with electrocardiographic effects)
* Intoxications treated via dialysis
* Pregnant, lactating, parturient women
* Medical indication for localized citrate anticoagulation
* dialysis of less than 12 h
* patient or representative refuses to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pascal Jeannes, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Nîmes, Gard, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Roger C, Muller L, Wallis SC, Louart B, Saissi G, Lipman J, Lefrant JY, Roberts JA. Population pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients on renal replacement therapy: comparison of equal doses in continuous venovenous haemofiltration and continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Feb;71(2):464-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv349. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26538503 (View on PubMed)

Roger C, Wallis SC, Muller L, Saissi G, Lipman J, Bruggemann RJ, Lefrant JY, Roberts JA. Caspofungin Population Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration or Haemodiafiltration. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Sep;56(9):1057-1068. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0495-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28035589 (View on PubMed)

Roger C, Wallis SC, Muller L, Saissi G, Lipman J, Lefrant JY, Roberts JA. Influence of Renal Replacement Modalities on Amikacin Population Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jul 22;60(8):4901-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00828-16. Print 2016 Aug.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27270279 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LOCAL/2011/PJ-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

2011-A01550-41

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ultrasound to Evaluate Acute Kidney Injury
NCT06241417 NOT_YET_RECRUITING