Lower Knee Joint Loading by Real-time Biofeedback Stair Walking Rehabilitation for Patients With MCKOA

NCT ID: NCT03734380

Last Updated: 2020-02-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will establish a machine-learning algorithm to predict KAM using IMU sensors during stair ascent and descent; and then conduct a three-arm randomized controlled trial to compare the biomechanical and clinical difference between patients receiving a course of conventional laboratory-based stair retraining, sensor-based stair retraining, and walking exercise control (i.e., walking exercise without gait retraining). The investigators hypothesise that the wearable IMUs will accurately predict KAM during stair negotiation using machine-learning algorithm, with at least 80% measurement agreement with conventional calculation of KAM. The investigators also hypothesise that patients randomized to the laboratory-based and sensor-based stair retraining conditions would evidence similar (i.e., weak and non-significant differences) reduction in KAM (primary outcome) and an improvement of symptoms (secondary outcomes), but that these subjects would evidence larger reductions in KAM than subjects assigned to the walking exercise control condition.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conventionally, gait retraining is necessarily implemented in a laboratory environment because evaluation of biomechanical markers, such as KAM, requires sophisticated motion capturing system and force plates. With advancement of wearable sensor technology, it is possible to measure gait biomechanics and provide real time biofeedback for gait retraining using inertial measurement unit (IMU), which is a lightweight and portable wireless device. In an ongoing government funded project, the investigators have developed IMU embedded footwear that measures KAM during level ground walking. The investigators have compared Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and Random Forest in the prediction of KAM from IMU recordings. The investigators found that Random Forest could provide much higher KAM prediction accuracy than LASSO regression. The agreement between conventional laboratory-based and sensor-based measurement of KAM was approximately 90%. Based on investigators' previous research work, it is meaningful to extend the newly developed technology for KAM measurement during stair ascent and descent without the use of laboratory equipment. With the wearable sensors connected to the smartphones, gait retraining outside laboratory environment will become feasible but the effects of gait retraining using wearable sensors have not been directly verified.

Given these considerations, this project has two primary aims. The investigators will: (1) first establish a machine-learning algorithm to predict KAM using IMU sensors during stair ascent and descent; and then (2) conduct a three-arm randomized controlled trial to compare the biomechanical and clinical difference between patients receiving a course of conventional laboratory-based stair retraining, sensor-based stair retraining, and walking exercise control (i.e., walking exercise without gait retraining).

Primary hypothesis

Hypothesis 1: The wearable IMUs will accurately predict KAM during stair negotiation using machine-learning algorithm, with at least 80% measurement agreement with conventional calculation of KAM.

Hypothesis 2: Patients randomized to the laboratory-based and sensor-based stair retraining conditions would evidence similar (i.e., weak and non-significant differences) reduction in KAM (primary outcome) and an improvement of symptoms (secondary outcomes), but that these subjects would evidence larger reductions in KAM than subjects assigned to the walking exercise control condition.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laboratory-based gait retraining (LGR)

Subjects will attend 6 weekly sessions of stair ascent and descent exercise over six consecutive weeks. In each session, they walk at a self-selected speed on the instrumented staircase. The training time will be progressively increased from 15 to 30 minutes over the six sessions. The auditory feedback will be gradually removed in the last three sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laboratory-based gait retraining (LGR)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects in the LGR group will be encouraged to modify the gait pattern (e.g. adjusting foot progression angle, performing medial knee thrust, and/or lateral trunk lean) to lower their KAM to 80% of respective average baseline KAM obtained during normal unmodified gait. Real-time auditory feedback will be delivered using stereo speakers from both sides of the staircase. A middle C (261.6 Hz) tone and a high-pitched C (4186.0 Hz) of equal intensity will be generated at a footfall below and above the targeted 80% value, respectively. They will be advised to maintain their new gait pattern during their daily living after training.

Sensor-based gait retraining (SGR)

Subjects will receive training similar to LGR, except the KAM measurement is based solely on inputs from IMUs embedded in the shoes. The training schedule, duration, and intensity will be identical to those of the LGR group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sensor-based gait retraining (SGR)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects in the SGR group will receive training similar to LGR, except the KAM measurement is based solely on inputs from IMUs embedded in the shoes. In addition, the auditory feedback will be delivered through a pair of earphones connected to a smartphone, which has been pre-installed with an app for KAM measurement. They will be advised to maintain their new gait pattern during their daily living after training.

Walking exercise control (Ctrl)

Subjects will attend 6 weekly sessions of stair ascent and descent exercise over six consecutive weeks. In each session, they will walk on the same instrumented staircase at a self-selected pace without any guidance on gait modification. The training period and training time per session will be identical to the other two groups.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Walking exercise control (Ctrl)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects in the Ctrl group will walk on the same instrumented staircase at a self-selected pace without any guidance on gait modification. The training period and training time per session will be identical to the other two groups. They will not be given any instructions for out-of-lab activities.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laboratory-based gait retraining (LGR)

Subjects in the LGR group will be encouraged to modify the gait pattern (e.g. adjusting foot progression angle, performing medial knee thrust, and/or lateral trunk lean) to lower their KAM to 80% of respective average baseline KAM obtained during normal unmodified gait. Real-time auditory feedback will be delivered using stereo speakers from both sides of the staircase. A middle C (261.6 Hz) tone and a high-pitched C (4186.0 Hz) of equal intensity will be generated at a footfall below and above the targeted 80% value, respectively. They will be advised to maintain their new gait pattern during their daily living after training.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sensor-based gait retraining (SGR)

Subjects in the SGR group will receive training similar to LGR, except the KAM measurement is based solely on inputs from IMUs embedded in the shoes. In addition, the auditory feedback will be delivered through a pair of earphones connected to a smartphone, which has been pre-installed with an app for KAM measurement. They will be advised to maintain their new gait pattern during their daily living after training.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Walking exercise control (Ctrl)

Subjects in the Ctrl group will walk on the same instrumented staircase at a self-selected pace without any guidance on gait modification. The training period and training time per session will be identical to the other two groups. They will not be given any instructions for out-of-lab activities.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 45-80 years of age;
2. patients with early medial compartment knee OA (Kellgren \& Lawrence grade = 1 or 2);
3. self-reported knee pain at least once per week for the proceeding eight weeks;
4. patients should be able to walk unaided for at least 60 minutes.

Exclusion Criteria

1. have a body mass index \>35;
2. have a known learning disability;
3. use a shoe insert or knee brace;
4. have received corticosteroid injection within the previous eight weeks;
5. have absolute contraindications for vigorous physical activities according to the American College of Sports Medicine;
6. in order to avoid floor effect of training, all subjects will undergo an initial screening and only those with KAM greater than 0.3 Nm/kg during level ground walking will be invited into the retraining study.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

City University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bern University of Applied Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Roy Tsz-hei CHEUNG

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roy TH CHEUNG, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Hong Kong, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Roy TH CHEUNG, PhD

Role: CONTACT

2766 6739

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Roy TH CHEUNG, PhD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cheung RTH, Ho KKW, Au IPH, An WW, Zhang JHW, Chan ZYS, Deluzio K, Rainbow MJ. Immediate and short-term effects of gait retraining on the knee joint moments and symptoms in patients with early tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Nov;26(11):1479-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30081075 (View on PubMed)

Cheung RT, Ngai SP, Ho KK. Chinese adaptation and validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2016 Oct;36(10):1449-54. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3539-7. Epub 2016 Jul 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27449346 (View on PubMed)

Fong ICD, Li WSC, Tai WKJ, Tsang TWR, Zhang JH, Chen TLW, Baur H, Eichelberger P, Cheung RTH. Effect of foot progression angle adjustment on the knee adduction moment and knee joint contact force in runners with and without knee osteoarthritis. Gait Posture. 2018 Mar;61:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.029. Epub 2017 Dec 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29304509 (View on PubMed)

Wei M, Chow TWS, Chan RHM. Heterogeneous feature subset selection using mutual information-based feature transformation. Neurocomputing. 2015;168:706-718. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.05.053.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Yuqi Li, Jelfs B, Chan RHM. Entropy of surface EMG reflects object weight in grasp-and-lift task. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:2530-2533. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037372.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29060414 (View on PubMed)

Zhang JH, Chan ZYS, Au IPH, An WW, Cheung RTH. Can the Newly Learnt Gait Pattern after Running Retraining be Translated to Untrained Conditions?: 1547 Board #8 May 31 1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:373. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000536311.33285.d2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HSEARS20181031005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gait Rehabilitation to Treat FastOA
NCT05848622 RECRUITING NA