Physiologic Volume and Atrophy of Brain and Spinal Cord Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

NCT ID: NCT03706118

Last Updated: 2020-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-15

Study Completion Date

2021-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spinal cord (SC) involvement is prevalent in multiple sclerosis (MS) and contributes importantly to disease progression. To be able reliably evaluate spinal cord volume and its changes in MS patients we need to understand variability of these parameters in sex and age matched healthy controls (HC). To date, no generally available data about these parameters in HC are available.

The objective of this study is to investigate age and sex matched HC by MRI to get the basic set of the data representing both cross sectional values and its longitudinal changes.

The present study will also investigate different strategies how to normalize the absolute spinal cord and brain volume data, what is a relationship between spinal cord volume and brain volume and what is the best protocol to be used in a routine clinical practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease that affects central nervous system. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the main paraclinical examination used to monitor disease activity and response to treatment. However, there is only limited correlation between the clinical symptoms and findings seen on the conventional MRI - a phenomena called clinical-radiological paradox. Measuring whole and regional brain atrophy provides additional information to MRI and seems to correlate better with clinical course and prognosis. In the last two decades, brain atrophy in MS has been exten sively studied, cut-offs for brain volume loss over time has been established and it is likely that it will become an important outcome measure in both clinical studies and routine practice.

Compared to brain atrophy, spinal cord (SC) atrophy and its relation to MS-related disability has been given less attention. This is partly due to technical challenges such as inhomogeneous magnetic field in this region, small physical dimensions of SC and artefacts caused by motion of the SC within the spinal canal together with the flow of cerebrospinal fluid and periodic motion due to respiratory and cardiac cycles. Moreover, focal spinal cord MS lesions may cause both swelling and shrinking of SC that influence its absolute volume, resulting in problems with interpretation of absolute SC volume in MS. Despite all these challenges, it is possible to identify SC lesions and reliably measure SC volume, but there is no "gold standard" (standardized) software for SC volume measurement and no agreement on the SC level (segments) that is most suitable for SC volume loss measurement.

During 2016 we have developed an in-house semiautomatic pipeline for measurement of cervical spinal cord volume that is a part of Scanview program. The segmentation is performed on T2-weighted images. In the first step, a marker is manually placed in a center of an intervertebral disc C3-4 (sagittal plane). Subsequently a cord straightening (manual rotation of the cord to achieve a perpendicular orientation of spinal cord to dorsal part of C3 vertebral body), that enable to reduce partial volume due to the cord orientation. After this centering and straightening,transformation matrix is saved and all subsequent steps are fully automatized. These steps include: 1. Sub-pixel division, 2. Reversing the contrast of T2-weighted images and smoothing by applying a set of median, Gaussian and edge-enhancing filters and 4. Cubic spline interpolation to find a curve that represents a border of a spinal cord with highest probability. Finally, a sum of mean areas of 21 1-mm slices is calculated (1 center slice fixed at center of a intervertebral disc C3-4 and 2 x 10 slices in cranial and caudal direction. Using this new software we have assessed 1,036 MS patients during 2016 and 2017. The intra- and inter-rater variability of SC volume assessment was done by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a two-way mixed absolute agreement and single-measures design. The analysis confirmed very good consistency (\> 98%) of the method. The preliminary results showed a significant correlation between spinal cord volume and different clinical phenotypes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cognitive Change Atrophy Brain Atrophy; Spinal Cord Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Prospective, longitudinal, monocentric, interventional study
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MRI and Neuropsychologic testing

102 healthy controls will be examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain, spinal and thoracic cord at month 0, 12, 24 and 36.

102 healthy controls will be examined by neuropsychological and walking testing designed for patients with multiple sclerosis at month 0, 12, 24 and 36.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Magnetic resonance imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

At month 0, 12, 24 and 36 participants will be examined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain, cervical and part of thoracic spine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Magnetic resonance imaging

At month 0, 12, 24 and 36 participants will be examined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain, cervical and part of thoracic spine.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Each participant must provide informed consent in accordance with local regulations
2. Age 18-60 years.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Not able to undergo MRI examination
2. Not able to be examined 4 times, i.e. M 0, 12, 24, 36 during the next 3 years
3. Pregnancy at the time of enrollment into the study
4. Other disease or medical condition that can influence the volume of brain or spinal cord
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dana Horakova

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dana Horakova

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dana Horakova, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dpt of Neurology, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dpt of Neurology, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vaneckova M, Piredda GF, Andelova M, Krasensky J, Uher T, Srpova B, Havrdova EK, Vodehnalova K, Horakova D, Hilbert T, Marechal B, Fartaria MJ, Ravano V, Kober T. Periventricular gradient of T1 tissue alterations in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin. 2022;34:103009. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103009. Epub 2022 Apr 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35561554 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KHL 182/2017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CNS Changes Following SCI
NCT03772548 RECRUITING
MS Spinal Mobilisation Study
NCT05090709 COMPLETED NA