Assessment of Collagen Plug for Alveolar Socket Sealing With Simultaneous Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone

NCT ID: NCT03696862

Last Updated: 2018-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-20

Study Completion Date

2019-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Following tooth extraction alveolar ridge will undergo dimensional changes and soft tissue may collapse. These changes may complicate the subsequent restorative procedure especially in the esthetic zone.

It was observed that socket-healing process may be divided into three sequential, and frequently over-lapping phases: inflammatory, proliferative and modeling/remodeling.

Implants placed in fresh extraction sockets alone wasn't found to prevent the resorption of the alveolar bone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Alveolar socket preservation using primary flap closure technique utilizing free gingival graft in conjunction with bone substitutes didn't produce the desired effect on ridge preservation compared with bone substitutes alone. A clinical trial showed that achieving primary closure didn't present additional beneficial effect on preserving ridge width, however, the mucosa was significantly thicker and more coronally positioned.

Also soft tissue graft has its limitations on covering graft material and socket preservation due to the higher morbidity given that the soft tissue graft has to be harvested from a donor site of the patient.

Another options for socket seal are coronal advancement of buccal flap or rotating grafts from tissue adjacent to cover the defect but they have limitations such as altering the mucogingival line and creating a shallow vestibule.

Lekovic et al. investigated the use of a non-resorbable polytetrafluroethylene membrane but it was found also to have its limitations as 30% of the membranes became exposed and as a result loss of bone height and width occurred.

Also studies have found that using bone substitutes together with collagen membrane with primary closure of the socket has shown clear effects on preserving alveolar ridge height as well as ridge width, however, its limitation are flap dehiscence and subsequent membrane exposure and the increased cost.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Badly Decayed Upper Anterior Teeth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

collagen plug

collagen plug used to seal the socket after atraumatic extraction of the badly deacayed teeth with immediate implant placement and bone graft

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

free gingival graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Use of free gingival graft to seal the socket after flapless atraumatic tooth extraction is performed, implant placement and filling the socket with bone graft.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

free gingival graft

Use of free gingival graft to seal the socket after flapless atraumatic tooth extraction is performed, implant placement and filling the socket with bone graft.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone (incisors/premolars) requiring extractions.
* Both sexes.
* No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
* No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement.

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncontrolled periapical infections
* Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
* Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
* Psychiatric problems
* Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site
* Immunodeficiency pathology, bruxism, stress situation (socially or professionally), emotional instability, and unrealistic aesthetic demands.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

sara elsandouby

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sara MR Elsandouby, bachelor's

Role: CONTACT

01281106660

Mohamed A Abdelrasoul, PhD

Role: CONTACT

01009612708

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CairoUimplant master porgram

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.