Comparison of Peri-implant Tissues Using Socket Shield Technique Versus Xenograft

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-22

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to clinically and radiographically evaluate the dimensional changes of soft and hard peri-implant tissues around single immediate post-extraction implants in the esthetic zone.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Effect of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft with Socket Shield Technique

NCT06659081

Socket Shield Technique Implant Placement Immediate Implant Placement

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Flapless Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield Technique Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Anterior Maxilla

NCT07303374

Immediate Dental Implant Placement Connective Tissue Graft Socket Shield Technique

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Comparison of Peri Implant Soft Tissue Esthetics With Immediate Temporization With and Without Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft

NCT03770975

Immediate Temporization and Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Delayed Implants

UNKNOWN PHASE3

Elamrousy Novel Approach of Socket Shield Technique

NCT06263842

Implant Complication

COMPLETED NA

Hard Tissue Augmentation With or Without Connective Tissue Graft in Immediate Esthetic Implants

NCT07333534

Dental Implant

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

to compare the efficacy of the socket shield technique in counteracting the dimensional changes of the soft and hard peri-implant tissues to filliing the buccal gap with xenograft.

* Population (P): Patients with single non-restorable tooth in the esthetic zone.
* Intervention (I): Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique.
* Comparator (C): Immediate implant placement and filling the buccal gap with xenograft.
* Primary Outcome (O): Pink Esthetic Score (PES) (Fürhauser et al., 2005).
* Time frame: 9 months (Chu et al., 2015).
* Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Socket Shield

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

experimental

immediate implant with socket shield technique

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

socket shield technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

immediate implant placement with buccal part of the root is retained

control

immediate implant placement with filling the buccal gap with xenograft

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

xenograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

immediate implant placement with filling the buccal gap with xenograft

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

socket shield technique

immediate implant placement with buccal part of the root is retained

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

xenograft

immediate implant placement with filling the buccal gap with xenograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient's age was 18 years or older.
2. Non-restorable tooth in the upper inter-bicuspid area.
3. Adequate bone volume for the placement of immediate implant.
4. Following tooth extraction, there was an intact socket bony wall (type I extraction socket).
5. Primary stability of the implant was achieved at the time of the implant placement.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who reported tobacco use in the past 5 years.
2. Patients who had severe periodontal destruction at the site of implant placement.
3. The presence of any signs of acute infection in the surgical site or the adjacent two natural teeth.
4. Patients who had history of any systemic disease that precludes the placement of implants.
5. Any disease that might affect bone metabolism as osteoporosis.
6. Patients taking medications that might affect bone turn over as bisphosphonates.
7. Physically or mentally handicapped patients.
8. Pregnant females.
9. Teeth with vertical root fractures on the buccal aspect
10. Teeth with any other pathologies affecting the buccal part of the root, for example, external or internal resorptions.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes