Effect of Different Sperm Processing Methods in ICSI Outcome.

NCT ID: NCT03668106

Last Updated: 2022-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-01

Study Completion Date

2022-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A total 180 semen samples from couples diagnosed with unexplained infertility were SDF index tested , then total 120 semen samples of patients' husbands with abnormal SDF index were randomly divided and then processed by swim up, sperm gradient centrifugation and Zeta methods. SDF and ICSI outcomes are monitored after semen processing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A total 180 semen samples from couples diagnosed with unexplained infertility were SDF index tested , then total 120 semen samples of patients' husbands with abnormal SDF index were randomly divided and then processed by swim up (G1/ n=40), sperm gradient centrifugation (G2/ n=40) and Zeta (G3/ n=40) methods. SDF test was assessed by Halosperm kit, whereas sperm morphology was assessed by spermac stain according to strict criteria. Fertilization, division, blastulation, implantation and pregnancy rates will be tabulated and statistically tested.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sperm DNA Fragmentation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

swim up technique
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
zeta technique

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

swim up method

Measure volume using a sterile 2 mL pipet.Transfer specimen from a plastic cup to a sterile 15 mL- conical centrifuge tube. Gently mix the specimen with equal volume of Sperm Washing Media. Centrifuge the tubes at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes.Carefully aspirate the supernatant without disturbing the pellet and resuspend the pellet in 50mcm of fresh washing medium, then place layer of 0.5 ml of washing medium gently on the surface. Incubate the tubes at a 45° angle for 1 hour for swim-up in vertical rack in a 37°C incubator. After the incubation period, aspirate the entire supernatant from the round bottom tube. Aliquots of the detached sperm were analyzed by halosperm assay for DNA fragmentation another aliquots of same supernatant were used for ICSI then fertilization, division, blastulation, pregnancy and implantation rates were tabulated and statistically tested.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

sperm processing method

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

different sperm processing method for selcting most proper sperm for ICSI

sperm gradient centrifugation

PureSperm gradients 40 % and 80 % were used for the experiment. All procedures were conducted under sterile conditions. Using a sterile pipette, 2.0 mL of the "lower layer" (80% PureSperm gradient) was transferred into a conical centrifuge tube.

Using a new sterile pipette, 2.0 mL of the "upper layer" (40% PureSperm gradient) was gently dispensed on top of the lower layer. A liquefied semen sample was then placed on top of the upper layer and the tube was centrifuged for 20 minutes at 300g. The upper and lower layers were carefully aspirated without disturbing the pellet. Using a transfer pipette, 2-3 mL of Ham's F10 +10% HAS was added to the pellet and the resuspended pellet was centrifuged for 7 minutes at 300g. The supernatant was then removed and the pellet was suspended in a volume of 0.5 mL of Ham's F10 + FCS 10%. Aliquots of the detached sperm were dealt with like previous arm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

sperm processing method

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

different sperm processing method for selcting most proper sperm for ICSI

zeta method

sperm samples were diluted 5 million in 1 ml. To induce a positive charge, the tube was placed inside a latex glove up to the cap and grasping the cap, the tube was rotated two or three turns and rapidly pulled out. Each tube was kept at room temperature for 1 minute to allow adherence of the charged sperm to the wall of the centrifuge tube.

Tubes were hold by the cap to avoid grounding of the tube. After 1 minute the tubes were centrifuged at 200g for 5 minutes. Then, the medium and pellet were discarded in order to discard non adhering sperm and other cells. The surface of tube was washed by 0.2ml of Ham's F10+ FCS 10% in order to neutralize the charge on the wall of the tube and detach the adhering sperm.

The collected medium at the bottom of each tube was repipetted and used to rinse the wall of the same tube several times to increase the number of recovered sperm . Aliquots of the detached sperm were dealt with like previous arm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

sperm processing method

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

different sperm processing method for selcting most proper sperm for ICSI

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

sperm processing method

different sperm processing method for selcting most proper sperm for ICSI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* unexplained infertile couples for 2 years
* age from 20 years old to 37 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* endometriosis cases
* uterine factors
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

37 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hawaa Fertility Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Benha University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Saad

Ass. prof. OB & GYN

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ahmed Saad

Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Hawaa-4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fresh Vs Frozen Surgical Sperm in IVF
NCT03361982 TERMINATED NA