MINDD 3: Prediabetes and Delay Discounting

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-12

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The proposed research will translate research on delay discounting to the prevention of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in persons with prediabetes. In this study, the investigators will verify target engagement (DD) by examining if EFT improves DD under conditions shown to increase discounting of the future. Prediabetics will be randomized to receive EFT/ERT in a factorial design when experiencing simulated poverty/neutral conditions, respectively. The effects will be measured on DD. The investigators predict that poverty conditions will increase discounting of the future for ERT subjects, but those receiving EFT will show levels of DD similar to levels observed for participants in the wealth condition.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

A Remotely Delivered Episodic Future Thinking Intervention to Improve Management of Type 2 Diabetes

NCT03732209

Type 2 Diabetes

COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2

Imagine to Remember: Improving Medication Adherence in Pre- and Type 2 Diabetes

NCT04157673

Medication Adherence

COMPLETED NA

Mindful Stress Reduction in Diabetes Self-management Education for Veterans

NCT02928952

Diabetes Mellitus

COMPLETED NA

Reducing Clinical Inertia in Diabetes Care

NCT00272402

Diabetes Mellitus Hypertension Hyperlipidemia

COMPLETED NA

A Mindfulness-based Intervention for Adolescents With Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes

NCT07270900

Type 2 Diabetes Prediabetes

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The prevention of Type 2 diabetes in an obese person with prediabetes requires developing a healthier lifestyle. The rational approach for someone with prediabetes would be to eat healthier, be more active, lose weight, and manage their comorbidities. However, preliminary research suggests that individuals with Type 2 diabetes discount the future and engage in behaviors that maximize current pleasure and short-term gain; thus, daily choices needed to improve future health are rare in this population. Delay discounting (DD) describes the choice of smaller immediate versus larger delayed rewards. This behavioral process is related to a wide variety of health choices, ranging from preventive health to behavioral and medical regimen adherence, including regimens used for Type 2 diabetes. The investigators believe that DD provides a target for one type of self-regulation that can improve a wide variety of health behaviors and medical adherence.

Research from our laboratories has shown that episodic future thinking (EFT), a form of prospection which reduces the bias towards immediate gratification, activates brain regions involved in planning and prospection such that future rewards have increased value and the extent of delay discounting is reduced. Cueing individuals to think about future events during inter-temporal decision-making reduces the rate of DD, eating in and outside of the laboratory, and smoking behavior. The overarching goal of this research is to use an experimental medicine approach to translate basic research on DD and EFT into clinical interventions to prevent the transition from prediabetes to a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

PreDiabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Participants will be assigned to complete an episodic future or recent thinking task and asked to describe positive events for different time periods.

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) & Neutral Narrative

Participants will complete an episodic thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods.The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event (e.g., vacations, weddings, parties, and so forth). EFT participants will list positive future events they are looking forward to and list events that could happen at different general future time points (e.g., 1 month, 2-6 months, 7-12 months). Participants will also be asked to think about a neutral narrative that describes a situation in which changes to their income are neutral or minimal

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Episodic Future Thinking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be instructed to use their episodic future cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.

Neutral Narrative

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will read a narrative in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have been transferred between departmental jobs, with little change in salary/commute.

Episodic Recent Thinking (ERT) & Neutral Narrative

Participants will complete an episodic recent thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods. The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event. ERT participants will list positive recent events they enjoyed and list events that happened recently (e.g. 1 - 7 days ago). Participants will also be asked to think about a neutral narrative that describes a situation in which changes to their income are neutral or minimal (e.g. department job transfer).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Episodic Recent Thinking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be instructed to use their episodic recent cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.

Neutral Narrative

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will read a narrative in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have been transferred between departmental jobs, with little change in salary/commute.

Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) & Scarcity Narrative

Participants will complete an episodic thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods.The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event (e.g., vacations, weddings, parties, and so forth). EFT participants will list positive future events they are looking forward to and list events that could happen at different general future time points (e.g., 1 month, 2-6 months, 7-12 months). Participants will also be asked to think about a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset by describing a situation in which changes to their income are negative (e.g. loss of job).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Episodic Future Thinking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be instructed to use their episodic future cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.

Scarcity Narrative

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will read a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset, in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have lost their job and have no current secondary income.

Episodic Recent Thinking (ERT) & Scarcity Narrative

Participants will complete an episodic recent thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods. The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event. ERT participants will list positive recent events they enjoyed and list events that happened recently (e.g. 1 - 7 days ago). Participants will also be asked to think about a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset by describing a situation in which changes to their income are negative (e.g. loss of job).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Episodic Recent Thinking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be instructed to use their episodic recent cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.

Scarcity Narrative

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will read a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset, in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have lost their job and have no current secondary income.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Episodic Future Thinking

Participants will be instructed to use their episodic future cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Episodic Recent Thinking

Participants will be instructed to use their episodic recent cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Scarcity Narrative

Participants will read a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset, in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have lost their job and have no current secondary income.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Neutral Narrative

Participants will read a narrative in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have been transferred between departmental jobs, with little change in salary/commute.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EFT ERT Scarcity Neutral

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Prediabetes: Participants must have a diagnosis of prediabetes within the last 2 years or meet criteria for prediabetes. The American Diabetes Association guidelines defines prediabetes as Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) 100-125 mg/dl, 2h glucose 140-199 mg/dl after Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) approximately 5.7-6.4%.
* Comorbidities: Participants must have a history of comorbid diagnosis such as hypertension and/or hyperlipidemia to participate in the behavioral portion of this study. Hypertension is defined as blood pressure greater than 140/90 on two separate occasions at least one week apart, or medical management for hypertension (i.e. medications including Lisinopril and Diovan). Dyslipidemia is defined by LDL greater than 130 mg/dl, or non-fasting non HDL cholesterol ≥160mg/dL or medical management for dyslipidemia (medications including Niacin, Lovastatin).

Exclusion Criteria

* Type 2 Diabetes: Individuals will be excluded if they have Type 2 Diabetes.
* Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant or lactating will be excluded from participation.
* Conditions that affect adherence: Participants should not have a condition that would limit participation which include medical conditions that would affect individuals' ability to use the computer for prolonged period of time; leave the individual unable to ambulate; or current diagnoses of an eating disorder (anorexia, bulimia,), unmanaged psychiatric disorder (depression, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia), or an intellectual impairment that would impact study adherence.
* Abnormal glucose related to medications: Participants should not be taking medications that would limit participation and cause abnormal glucose levels (e.g. atypical antipsychotic medications or glucocorticoids) including diabetic drugs such as Metformin.
* Unwilling or unable to eat study food: Participants who are unwilling or not able to eat the study food (a PowerBar) will not be able to take part in this study.

Prior participation in similar studies: Individuals who have recently participated in a laboratory study using similar methods may also be excluded.

* Do not meet discounting criteria: Individuals who do not meet discounting criteria (e.g. nonsystematic discounting) on a delay discounting task may be excluded.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No